Abstract
Purpose
As the EQ-5D was developed in western countries with only five dimensions, it might be insensitive to non-western populations including Thai. This study examined the impact of adding two candidate dimensions, “interpersonal relationships (IR)” and “activities related to bending knees (AK),” to the EQ-5D questionnaire, and evaluated their psychometric properties in a Thai population sample.
Methods
Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 600 Thai. Ceiling effect for the EQ-5D and the EQ-5D-5L+AK+IR were compared. Spearman’s rho correlation was used to determine whether the two new dimensions were redundant with the existing EQ-5D dimensions. Correlations between the two dimensions and similar dimensions of the SF-36v2 were also assessed. Hierarchical multiple regression was performed to evaluate the incremental value of the EQ-5D-5L+AK+IR over the EQ-5D in predicting VAS scores.
Results
The two new dimensions were not redundant with the existing five dimensions of the EQ-5D. The highest correlation (0.371) was found between MO and AK. The overall ceiling effect decreased by 5% (50.5–45.5%) when using the EQ-5D-5L+AK+IR. Moderate correlations were found between the candidate dimensions and similar dimensions of the SF-36v2. Multiple regression indicated that adding AK (adjusted r2 0.329 vs. 0.306) but not IR (adjusted r2 0.307 vs. 0.306) significantly increased ability to predict VAS scores.
Conclusions
Our preliminary results suggested that AK holds promise for making the EQ-5D more relevant to Thai while it is premature to conclude on the impact of IR. Nevertheless, more work is required to carefully assess the value of the new dimensions as well as the trade-off for the modification.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
18 October 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03004-y
References
Brooks, R. (1996). EuroQol: The current state of play. Health Policy, 37(1), 53–72.
Kind, P. (1996). The EuroQoL instrument: An index of health-related quality of life. In B. Spilker (Ed.), Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (2 ed., pp. 191–201). Philadephia: Lippincott-Raven.
Shah, K., Mulhern, B., Longworth, L., & Janssen, B. (2016). Important aspects of health not captured by eq-5d: Views of the UK general public. London, UK. Retrieved September 21, 2018, from https://euroqol.org/wpcontent/uploads/working_paper_series/EuroQol_Working_Paper_Series_Manuscript_16001_-_Koonal_K_Shah.pdf.
Cheung, Y. B., & Thumboo, J. (2006). Developing health-related quality-of-life instruments for use in Asia: The issues. Pharmacoeconomics, 24(7), 643–650.
Yang, Y., Rowen, D., Brazier, J., Tsuchiya, A., Young, T., & Longworth, L. (2015). An exploratory study to test the impact on three “bolt-on” items to the EQ-5D. Value Health, 18(1), 52–60.
Luo, N., Wang, X., Ang, M., Finkelstein, E. A., Aung, T., Wong, T. Y., et al. (2015). A vision “Bolt-On” item could increase the discriminatory power of the EQ-5D index score. Value Health, 18(8), 1037–1042.
Perneger, T. V., & Courvoisier, D. S. (2011). Exploration of health dimensions to be included in multi-attribute health-utility assessment. Internal Journal for Quality in Health Care, 23(1), 52–59.
Hoeymans, N., van Lindert, H., & Westert, G. P. (2005). The health status of the Dutch population as assessed by the EQ-6D. Quality of Life Research, 14(3), 655–663.
Yang, Y., Brazier, J., & Tsuchiya, A. (2014). Effect of adding a sleep dimension to the EQ-5D descriptive system: A “bolt-on” experiment. Medical Decision Making, 34(1), 42–53.
Kleinman, A., Eisenberg, L., & Good, B. (1978). Culture, illness, and care: Clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural research. Annals of Internal Medicine, 88(2), 251–258.
Sakthong, P. (2008). Measurement of clinical-effect: Utility. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 91(Suppl 2), S43–S52.
Thavorncharoensap, M. (2014). Measurement of utility. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 97(Suppl 5), S43–S49.
Xie, F., Li, S. C., Fong, K. Y., Lo, N. N., Yeo, S. J., Yang, K. Y., et al. (2006). What health domains and items are important to patients with knee osteoarthritis? A focus group study in a multiethnic urban Asian population. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 14(3), 224–230.
Benfayed, R., Hamilton, D., Moran, M., Simpson, A., & Macdonald, D. (2017). Interpretation of kneeling. Orthopedic & Muscular System, 06, 240.
Hampton, N. Z., & Qin-Hilliard, D. B. (2004). Dimensions of quality of life for Chinese adults with spinal cord injury: A qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(4), 203–212.
Schwartz, S. H. (1990). Individualism-collectivism: Critique and proposed refinements. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21(2), 139–157.
Zhang, W., & Ta, V. M. (2009). Social connections, immigration-related factors, and self-rated physical and mental health among Asian Americans. Social Science & Medicine, 68(12), 2104–2112.
Die, A. H., & Seelbach, W. C. (1988). Problems, sources of assistance, and knowledge of services among elderly Vietnamese Immigrants1. The Gerontologist, 28(4), 448–452.
Kim, H. K., & McKenry, P. C. (1998). Social networks and support: A comparison of African Americans, Asian Americans, Caucasians, and Hispanics. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 29(2), 313–334.
Kramer, E. J., Kwong, K., Lee, E., & Chung, H. (2002). Cultural factors influencing the mental health of Asian Americans. Western Journal of Medicine, 176(4), 227–231.
Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Stein, J. A., Jiraphongsa, C., Khumtong, S., Lee, S. J., & Li, L. (2010). Benefits of family and social relationships for Thai parents living with HIV. Prevention Science, 11(3), 298–307.
Whitehead, S. J., & Ali, S. (2010). Health outcomes in economic evaluation: The QALY and utilities. British medical bulletin, 96, 5–21.
Liem, Y. S., Bosch, J. L., Arends, L. R., Heijenbrok-Kal, M. H., & Hunink, M. G. (2007). Quality of life assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey of patients on renal replacement therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Value Health, 10(5), 390–397.
Ware, J. E. Jr., & Gandek, B. (1998). Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 945–952.
Coons, S. J., Rao, S., Keininger, D. L., & Hays, R. D. (2000). A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. Pharmacoeconomics, 17(1), 13–35.
Anderson, R. T., Aaronson, N. K., & Wilkin, D. (1993). Critical review of the international assessments of health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 2(6), 369–395.
Cohen P (1974). Regression and correlation. Statistic in medicine. Boston: Little Brown and Company.
US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration (2009). Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Retrieved June 6, 2018, from http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf.
Aekplakorn, W. (2016). Thai National Health Examination Survey, NHES V. Nonthaburi: Health Systems Research Institute.
Pattanaphesaj, J., & Thavorncharoensap, M. (2015). Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to EQ-5D-3L in the Thai diabetes patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13, 14.
Swinburn, P., Lloyd, A., Boye, K. S., Edson-Heredia, E., Bowman, L., & Janssen, B. (2013). Development of a disease-specific version of the EQ-5D-5L for use in patients suffering from Psoriasis: Lessons learned from a feasibility study in the UK. Value Health, 16(8), 1156–1162.
Martin-Fernandez, J., Ariza-Cardiel, G., Polentinos-Castro, E., Sanz-Cuesta, T., Sarria-Santamera, A., & Del Cura-Gonzalez, I. (2018). Explaining differences in perceived health-related quality of life: A study within the Spanish population. Gaceta Sanitaria, 32(5), 447–453.
Leidl, R., & Reitmeir, P. (2017). An experience-based value set for the EQ-5D-5L in Germany. Value Health, 20(8), 1150–1156.
Jelsma, J., & Ferguson, G. (2004). The determinants of self-reported health-related quality of life in a culturally and socially diverse South African community. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82(3), 206–212.
Bleichrodt, H., & Johannesson, M. (1997). An experimental test of a theoretical foundation for rating-scale valuations. Medical Decision Making, 17(2), 208–216.
Schwartz, A. (1998). Rating scales in context. Medical Decision Making, 18(2), 236–236.
Robinson, A., Loomes, G., & Jones-Lee, M. (2001). Visual analog scales, standard gambles, and relative risk aversion. Medical Decision Making, 21(1), 17–27.
Whynes, D. K. (2013). Does the correspondence between EQ-5D health state description and VAS score vary by medical condition? Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 155.
Sakthong, P., Sonsa-Ardjit, N., Sukarnjanaset, P., & Munpan, W. (2015). Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in Thai patients with chronic diseases. Quality of Life Research, 24(12), 3015–3022.
Acknowledgements
This publication is a part of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Social, Economic and Administrative Pharmacy, Faculty of Graduate Studies, Mahidol University. This project was also funded through the Royal Golden Jubilee (RGJ) Ph.D. Programme in Thailand (Grant No. PHD/0115/2556) provided by the Thailand Research Fund (TRF) and Mahidol University. The results and opinions in this report have not been endorsed by the above funding agency. We would like to express our gratitude to the EuroQoL group for allowing us to conduct this study. We are grateful to Dr. A. Simon Pickard for his invaluable advice and comments regarding the data analyses of this study. We are thankful to the National Statistical Office (NSO) in Thailand for their help with the sampling method. Special thanks also to all local village leaders and participants from the provinces of Chumporn, Chachoengsao, Bangkok, Chaing-Mai, and Loei in Thailand who facilitated or participated in the data collection process.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interests in this study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kangwanrattanakul, K., Gross, C.R., Sunantiwat, M. et al. Exploration of a cultural-adaptation of the EQ-5D for Thai population: A “bolt-on” experiment. Qual Life Res 28, 1207–1215 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2072-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2072-4