Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 1109–1116 | Cite as

Development and preliminary validation of the food intolerance Quality of Life Questionnaire (FIQLQ): Adult Form

  • Audrey DunnGalvin
  • Julie Barnett
  • Fiona M. Begen
  • Kathleen Ryan
  • Jane S. Lucas
Article

Abstract

Background

Approximately 20% of children and adults avoid certain foods because of perceived food intolerance. Valid and reliable health-related quality of life instruments are needed to measure changes following clinical, therapeutic or policy interventions. However, there are no disease-specific quality of life instruments for adults with food intolerances.

Objective

To develop the Food Intolerance Quality of Life Questionnaire FIQLQ. Then to conduct psychometric validation including reliability and construct validity.

Methods

We adapted the existing Food Allergy Quality of Life questionnaire (FAQLQ) for interviews with 14 adults with food intolerance. For preliminary psychometric validation, 229 adults with food intolerances completed the online electronic version of FIQLQ.

Results

The resultant FIQLQ had 18 items which loaded onto 3 subscales—Emotional Impact, Social and Dietary Restrictions, Reactions and Avoidance. Each subscale had excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α 0.81–0.94). Content, convergent and construct validity was supported by significant correlations of FIQLQ subscale scores with hypothesised variables including age, numbers of symptoms and level of stress experienced due to intolerance.

Conclusion

The FIQLQ has good reliability, construct validity and internal consistency. It is short and easy to use, providing a good tool for evaluating quality of life in the clinical research setting and to inform health and regulatory policies.

Keywords

Food intolerance Food venues Validation Consumer Patient Health-related quality of life Measurement Regulation Outcomes 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by the UK Food Standards Agency under project code FS305013. The research based at University of Southampton was further supported by The Asthma, Allergy and Inflammation Research Charity (AAIR).

Author contributions

JB and JL conceived the study and were involved in design and co-ordination of study. ADG drafted the paper and carried out data analysis. KR and FB collected data and assisted in data analysis. All authors helped in the final editing of paper and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

No competing interests for any of the authors, according to BioMed Central criteria.

Ethical approval

The Research Ethics Committee of the School of Applied Psychology, UCC, provided approval for the study. Data were stored in compliance with data protection laws.

Consent for participation and publication

Consent for participation and publication form was provided and signed by all participants in all phases of the study prior to participation. Available on request.

Availability of data and material

Data are stored in compliance with data protection laws in School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, College Rd., Cork City, Ireland, and Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, North East Somerset BA2 7AY, United Kingdom.

References

  1. 1.
    Montalto, M., Santoro, L., & D’Onofrio, F. (2008). Adverse reactions to food: Allergies and intolerances. Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 26(2), 96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hayder, H., Mueller, U., & Bartholomaeus, A. (2011) Review of intolerance reactions to food and food additives. International Food Risk Analysis Journal, 1, 23–32.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Venter, C., Pereira, B., Voigt, K., Grundy, J., Clayton, C. B., Higgins, B., Arshad, S. H., & Dean, T. (2008) Original article: Prevalence and cumulative incidence of food hypersensitivity in the first 3 years of life. Allergy, 63, 354–359.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01570.x.
  4. 4.
    Cummings, A. J., Knibb, R. C., King, R. M., & Lucas, J. S. (2010). The psychosocial impact of food allergy and food hypersensitivity in children, adolescents and their families: A review. Allergy, 65(8), 933–945.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roma, E., Roubani, A., Kolia, E., Panayiotou, J., Zellos, A., & Syriopoulou, V. P. (2010) Dietary compliance and life style of children with coeliac disease. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 23, 176–182.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Skjerning, H., Mahony, R., Husby, S., & DunnGalvin, A. (2014). Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with celiac disease: Patient-driven data from focus group interviews. Quality of Life Research, 23(6), 1883–1887.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ross, A., et al. (2013). Assessing quality outcome measures in children with coeliac disease: Experience from two UK centres. Nutrients, 5(11), 4605–4613.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Whitaker, J. K., West, J., Holmes, G. K., & Logan, R. F. (2009). Patient perceptions of the burden of coeliac disease and its treatment in the UK. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 29, 1131–1136.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Altobelli, E., Paduana, E., Gentile, T., Caloisi, C., Marziliano, C., Necozione, S., et al. (2013). Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with celiac disease: Survey of a population from central Italy. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 204.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    DunnGalvin, A., Hourihane, J. O. (2016) Health-related quality of life in food allergy :Impact, correlates, and predictors. Bundesgesundheitsbl.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-016-2368-x.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    DunnGalvin, A., de BlokFlokstra, B. M., Burks, A. W., Dubois, A. E., & Hourihane, J. O. (2009). Longitudinal validity and responsiveness of the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire—Parent Form in children following positive and negative food challenges. Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 40, 476–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Flokstra-de Blok, B. M., DunnGalvin, A., Vlieg-Boerstra, B. J., Oude Elberink, J. N., Duiverman, E. J., Hourihane, J. O., & Dubois, A. E. (2008). Development and validation of the self-administered Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire for adolescents. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 122(1), 139–144, 144.e1–2.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Flokstra-de Blok, B. M., van der Meulen, G. N., DunnGalvin, A., Vlieg-Boerstra, B. J., Oude Elberink, J. N., Duiverman, E. J., Hourihane, J. O., & Dubois, A. E. (2009). Development and validation of the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire—Adult Form. Allergy, 64(8), 1209–1217.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van der Velde, J. L., Flokstra-de Blok, B. M., de Groot, H., Oude-Elberink, J. N., Kerkhof, M., Duiverman, E. J., & Dubois, A. E. (2012). Food allergy-related quality of life after double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges in adults, adolescents, and children. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 130(5), 1136–1143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    DunnGalvin, A., Chang, W. C., Laubach, S., Steele, P. H., Dubois, A. E., Burks, A. W., & Hourihane, J. O. (2009) Profiling families enrolled in food allergy immunotherapy studies. Pediatrics, 124(3):e503–e509.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cummings, A. J., Knibb, R. C., Erlewyn-Lajeunesse, M., King, R. M., Roberts, G., & Lucas, J. S. (2010) Management of nut allergy influences quality of life and anxiety in children and their mothers. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 21(4 Pt 1):586–594.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Flokstra-de Blok, B. M. J. (2014) Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaires (FAQLQ). In A. C. Michalos (Eds.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 2319–2322). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van der Velde, J. L., Flokstra-de Blok, B. M., Vlieg-Boerstra, B. J., Oude Elberink, J. N., DunnGalvin, A., Hourihane, J. O., Duiverman, E. J., & Dubois, A. E. (2010). Development, validity and reliability of the food allergy independent measure (FAIM). Allergy, 65(5), 630–635.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Urbina, S. (2014) Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Wiley. ISBN: 978-1-118-68048-3.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Streiner D. L., Norman G. R. (2014) Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wegener, D. T. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis. New York: Oxford University Press Inc. ISBN10 0199734178.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007) Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Testing and Assessment: Guide to Good Practices. Skills Assessment and Analysis Program in the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Office of Policy and Research (OPR) Copyright 2015.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Iles, R. A., Davidson, M., Taylor, N. F., & O’Halloran, P. (2009). Systematic review of the ability of recovery expectations to predict outcomes in non-chronic non-specific low back pain. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 19, 25–40.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-008-9161-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Constantino, M. J., Arnkoff, D. B., Glass, C. R., Ametrano, R. M., Smith, J. Z. (2011). Expectations. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67, 184–192.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20754.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mondloch, M. V., Cole, D. C., & Frank, J. W. (2001). Does how you do depend on how you think you’ll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients’ recovery expectations and health outcomes. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 165, 174–179.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Barnett, J., Muncer, K., Leftwich, J., Shepherd, R., Raats, M. M., Gowland, M. H., et al. (2011). Using ‘may contain’ labelling to inform food choice: A qualitative study of nut allergic consumers. BMC Public Health, 11, 734.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2009). Guidance for industry patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Rockville: Food and Drug Administration (FDA)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Applied PsychologyUniversity College CorkCorkIreland
  2. 2.Department of Paediatrics and Child HealthCork University HospitalCorkIreland
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of BathBathUK
  4. 4.Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations