Self-management behavior among patients with diabetic retinopathy in the community: a structural equation model
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is an important, chronic complication of diabetes, requiring competent self-management that depends on adherence to behavioral regimens. This study attempted to identify factors influencing self-management behaviors and develop a model illustrating the interdependence of several factors associated with DR patients.
In June–December 2012, 368 patients with DR completed questionnaires assessing self-management behavior, diabetes knowledge, health beliefs, social support, and treatment adherence. Structural equation modeling was used to test predicted pathways linking self-management behavior to diabetes knowledge, health beliefs, social support, and treatment adherence.
The results indicated that health beliefs, treatment adherence, and duration of diabetes each had a direct impact on diabetes self-management (p < 0.05). Diabetes knowledge only indirectly influenced diabetes self-management, through health beliefs. Social support had a direct impact on diabetes self-management (β = 0.35, p < 0.01), and an indirect influence on diabetes self-management, through treatment adherence (β = 0.77, p < 0.01).
Health beliefs, treatment adherence, and social support directly affect diabetes self-management, and diabetes knowledge indirectly affects diabetes self-management. This suggests that enhancing DR patients’ health beliefs, treatment adherence, and social support would facilitate their diabetes self-management. Meanwhile, improved health education can strengthen diabetes knowledge, which in turn, can positively affect diabetes self-management.
KeywordsDiabetic retinopathy Health beliefs Self-management Social support Structural equation modeling
We would like to thank all study participants, and the doctors and nurses from the Jianhua community clinics in Qiqihar city for their considerable assistance.
This study was funded by the Ministry of Education of Heilongjiang province (Grant Number 12541377).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 18.Brownlee-Duffeck, M., Peterson, L., Simonds, J. F., Goldstein, D., Kilo, C., & Hoette, S. (1987). The role of health beliefs in the regimen adherence and metabolic control of adolescents and adults with diabetes mellitus. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(2), 139–144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Guan, N. C., Huai, S. L., Hway, A. A. Y., & Ong, H. K. (2015). Factorial validity and reliability of the malaysian simplified chinese version of multidimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS-SCV) among a group of university students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 27(2), 225–231.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Wang, R. H., & Lin, C. C. (1998). Self-care behaviors and related factors in outpatients newly diagnosed with non-Insulin dependent. The Journal of Nursing (in Chinese), 4(5), 60–74.Google Scholar
- 27.Rosland, A. M., Kieffer, E., Israel, B., Cofield, M., Palmisano, G., Sinco, B., et al. (2008). When is social support important? The association of family support and professional support with specific diabetes self-management behaviors. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23(12), 1992–1999.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar