Quality of Life Research

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 427–439 | Cite as

Lymphedema Quality of Life Inventory (LyQLI)-Development and investigation of validity and reliability

  • Pia Klernäs
  • Aina Johnsson
  • Vibeke Horstmann
  • Linda J. Kristjanson
  • Karin Johansson



The purpose of this study was to reduce the 188-item Swedish Lymphedema Quality of Life Inventory (SLQOLI) to an abbreviated, clinically useful version (phase 1) and to test it for reliability and validity (phase 2).


In phase 1 correlation analysis, factor analysis, content validity assessment and expert panels were used to reduce the number of items in SLQOLI to 45 items, which was named, Lymphedema Quality of Life Inventory (LyQLI). In phase 2, LyQLI was sent to 200 patients with lymphedema. 126 patients completed the questionnaire twice to determine stability of the instrument over time. SF-36 was sent to the patients once, correlations between the three domains in LyQLI and the two sum scores Physical Health (PCS) and Mental Health (MCS) in SF-36 were used to assess concurrent validity.


The 188-item SLQOLI was reduced to 45-item LyQLI. Four domains were reduced to three: physical, psychosocial and practical. Reliability estimates using ICC for the physical and psychosocial domains were 0.88 (p < 0.01) and 0.87 (p < 0.01), for the practical domain 0.87 (p < 0.01). Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the three domains were 0.88, 0.92 and 0.88, respectively. The physical domain correlated highly significantly with PCS, psychosocial highly significantly with MCS and practical equally highly significantly to both PCS and MCS. Using skewness coefficients, small floor effects in the items were found.


The shorter LyQLI demonstrated good reliability and validity with potential use to assess quality of life in clinic settings and in further cross-sectional studies of patients with lymphedema.


Health-related quality of life Lymphedema Disease-specific instrument Reliability Validity 



This study was supported by research grants from the Cancer Foundation in Sweden. The authors would also like to thank all the patients for their participation.


  1. 1.
    Damstra, R. J., & Mortimer, P. S. (2008). Diagnosis and therapy in children with Lymphedema. Phlebology, 23(6), 276–286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lawenda, B. D., Mondry, T. E., & Johnstone, A. S. (2009). Lymphedema: A primer on the identification and management of a chronic condition in oncologic treatment. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 59, 8–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Szuba, A., & Rockson, S. G. (1998). Lymphedema: Classification, diagnosis and therapy. Vascular medicine, 3, 145–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bogan, L. K., Powell, J. M., & Dudgeon, B. J. (2007). Experiences of living with non-cancer-related lymphedema: Implications for clinical practice. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 213–224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lane, K., Worsley, D., & McKenzie, D. (2005). Exercise and the lymphatic system: Implications for breast-cancer survivors. Sports medicine, 35, 461–471.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brorson, H., Ohlin, K., Olsson, G., et al. (2006). Quality of life following liposuction and conservative treatment of arm lymphedema. Lymphology, 39, 8–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mikami, T., Hosono, M., Yabuki, Y., Yamamoto, Y., Yasumura, K., Sawada, H., et al. (2011). Classification of lymphoscintigraphy and relevance to surgical indication for lymphaticovenous anastomosis in upper limb lymphedema. Lymphology, 44(4), 155–167.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Murdaca, G., Cagnati, P., Gulli, R., Spanò, F., Puppo, F., Campisi, C., et al. (2012). Current views on diagnostic approach and treatment of lymphedema. American Journal of Medicine, 125(2), 134–140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morgan, P. A., Franks, P. J., & Moffatt, C. J. (2005). Health-related quality of life with lymphoedema: A review of the literature. International Wound Journal, 2, 47–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sakorafas, G. H., Peros, G., Cataliotti, L., & Vlastos, G. (2006). Lymphedema following axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer. Surgical Oncology, 15, 153–165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johansson, K., Holmström, H., Nilsson, I., Ingvar, C., Albertsson, M., & Ekdahl, C. (2003). Breast cancer patients´ experiences of lymphoedema. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 17, 35–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    No authors listed. (1993). Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Quality of Life Research, 2(2), 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2000). Quality of Life: Assessment, analysis and interpretation (2nd ed.). West Sussex: Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berzon, R., Hays, R. D., & Shumaker, S. A. (1993). International use, application and performance of health-related quality of life instruments. Quality of Life Research, 2, 367–368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Schipper, H., Clinch, J., McMurray, A., & Lewitt, M. (1984). Measuring quality of life of cancer patients: the functional living index-cancer, development and validation. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2, 472–483.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brazier, J. E., Harper, R., Jones, N. M., O’Cathain, A., Thomas, K. J., Usherwood, T., et al. (1992). Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. British Medical Journal, 305(6846), 160–164.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sullivan, M., Karlsson, J., Taff, C., & Ware, J. E. (2002). SF-36 hälsoenkät: Svensk manual ochTolkningsguide, 2:a upplagan (Swedish Manual and Interpretation Guide (2nd ed.). Gothenburg: Sahlgrenska University Hospital.Google Scholar
  19. 19. Accessed 17 April 2013.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Keeley, V. (2008). Quality of life assessment in chronic oedema. British journal of community nursing, 13(10), 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pyszel, A., Malyszczak, K., Pyszel, K., Andrzejak, R., & Szuba, A. (2006). Disability, psychological distress and quality of life in breast cancer survivors with arm lymphedema. Lymphology, 39, 185–192.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wilson, R. W., Hutson, L. M., & Vanstry, D. (2005). Comparison of 2 quality-of-life questionnaires in women treated for breast cancer: The RAND 36-item health survey and the functional living index-cancer. Physical Therapy, 85, 851–860.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jäger, G., Doller, W., & Roth, R. (2006). Quality-of-Life and body image impairments in patients with lymphedema. Lymphology, 39, 193–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chachaj, A., Małyszczak, K., Pyszel, K., Lukas, J., Tarkowski, R., Pudełko, M., et al. (2010). Physical and psychological impairments of women with upper limb lymphedema following breast cancer treatment. Psycho-oncology, 19(3), 299–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sitzia, J., & Sobrido, L. (1997). Measurement of health-related quality of life of patients receiving conservative treatment for limb lymphoedema using the Nottingham Health Profile. Quality of Life Research, 6, 373–384.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Franks, P. J., Moffatt, C. J., Doherty, D. C., Williams, A. F., Jeffs, E., & Mortimer, P. S. (2006). Assessment of health-related quality of life in patients with lymphedema of the lower limb. Wound Repair Regen, 14, 110–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Launois, R., Mègnigbêto, A. C., Pocquet, K., Alliot, F., Campisi, C., Witte, M. H., et al. (2002). A specific quality of life scale in upper limb lymphedema: the ULL-27 questionnaire. Lymphology, 35, 181–187.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Devoogdt, N., Van Kampen, M., Geraerts, I., Coremans, T., & Christiaens, M. R. (2011). Lymphoedema Functioning, Disability and Health questionnaire (Lymph-ICF): reliability and validity. Physical therapy, 91(6), 944–957.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Augustin, M., Bross, F., Földi, E., Vanscheidt, W., & Zschocke, I. (2005). Development, validation and clinical use of the FLQA-I, a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire for patients with lymphedema. Vasa, feb, 34(1), 31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Keeley, V., Crooks, S., Locke, J., Veigas, D., Riches, K., & Hilliam, R. (2010). A quality of life measure for limb lymphoedema (LYMQOL). Journal of Lymphoedema, 5(1), 26–37.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Klernäs, P., Kristjanson, L. J., & Johansson, K. (2010). Assessment of quality of life in lymphedema patients: Validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the Lymphoedema quality of life inventory (LQOLI). Lymphology, 43, 135–145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (1998). Health measurement scales a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford medical publications.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cheville, A. L., McGarvey, C. L., Petrek, J. A., Russo, S. A., Thiadens, S. R., & Taylor, M. E. (2003). The grading of lymphedema in oncology clinical trials. Seminars in Radiation Oncology, 13(3), 214–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Svensson, E. (2012). Different ranking approaches defining association and agreement measures of paired ordinal doi: 10.1002/sim.5382. Accessed 24 April 2013.
  36. 36.
    Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research (1st ed.). London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Terwee, C. B., Bot, S., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal Of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Draper, S.W. (2002). The Hawthorne, Pygmalion, Placebo and other effects of expectation: some notes. URL: Accessed 25 June 2013.
  39. 39.
    Domholdt, E. (2005). Rehabilitation research (3d ed., p. 358). St. Louis, MI: Elsevier Saunders.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pia Klernäs
    • 1
  • Aina Johnsson
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Vibeke Horstmann
    • 5
  • Linda J. Kristjanson
    • 6
  • Karin Johansson
    • 1
    • 7
  1. 1.Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Health ScienceLund UniversityLundSweden
  2. 2.Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society Division of Social WorkKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Department of OncologyKarolinska University Hospital, SödersjukhusetStockholmSweden
  4. 4.Department of Social WorkKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
  5. 5.Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of MedicineLund UniversityLundSweden
  6. 6.Swinburne University of TechnologyMelbourneAustralia
  7. 7.Department of OncologySkåne University HospitalLundSweden

Personalised recommendations