Psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics in adolescence: validity and reliability of a questionnaire across age-groups
- 563 Downloads
Dental malocclusion is a highly prevalent health condition in adolescence. Patients seek treatment primarily for aesthetic reasons. Therapy benefits are regarded, in the first place, to be psychosocial in nature. Therefore, it is mandatory to consider the perspective of the patient in treatment planning and control using a dental-aesthetics-related quality of life measure. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ) developed in adult samples including the subscales Dental Self-Confidence, Social Impact, Psychological Impact and Aesthetic Concern is also applicable in adolescents aged 11 years and above. The psychometric properties were examined across three age-groups (11–12, 13–14, 15–17 year olds) with respect to factorial invariance, internal consistency, temporal stability, discriminant validity and gender- or age-associated scale mean differences and item response bias.
Participants were 1,112 adolescents recruited from 4 institutions: orthodontic and dental practices, schools, and youth clubs. They answered the 23 partially reformulated items of the PIDAQ. Subjective and dentist evaluations of dental occlusion were assessed using the Perception of Occlusion Scale and the Aesthetic Component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need. Both indices were aggregated to one Malocclusion Index (MI-S and MI-D).
The fit indices using confirmatory factor analyses suggested that the factor structure and factor loadings underlying the PIDAQ items were invariant across ages (comparative fit index = 0.91, root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.04). Internal consistency and temporal stability were adequate within the age-groupings (Alpha = 0.71–0.88; intra-class correlations = 0.82–0.96). Adolescents with severe compared to slight malocclusion according to both self-evaluation and dentist evaluation were found to differ in all PIDAQ subscales at a level of p < 0.001 for all ages. PIDAQ scale scores were not related to age and gender. On the item level, no evidence for gender or age bias has been found.
The PIDAQ demonstrates to have good psychometric properties in adolescents, independent of their age. The instrument can be applied in making clinical decisions and in the assessment of psychosocial outcomes of orthodontic therapy.
KeywordsQuality of life Adolescent Dental health Orthodontics Malocclusion
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- 3.Pietilä, T., & Pietilä, I. (1995). Dental appearance and orthodontic services assessed by 15-16-year old adolescents in Eastern Finland. Community Dental Health, 13, 139–144.Google Scholar
- 17.Afroz, S., Rathi, S., Raiput, G., & Rahman, S. A. (2013). Dental esthetics and its impact on psycho-social well-being and dental self-confidence: a campus survey of north Indian university students. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 13(4), 455–460.Google Scholar
- 30.Food and Drug Administration. (2009). Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Silver Spring: Food and Drug Administration.Google Scholar
- 39.DeVet, H. C. W., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., & Bouter, L. M. (2006). When to use agreement versus reliability measures. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 1033–1039.Google Scholar
- 41.Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- 42.Nourisis, M. J. (1985). SPSS advanced statistics guide. New York: McFraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- 43.Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- 53.Cash, T. F., & Strachan, M. D. (2002). Cognitive-behavioral approaches to changing body image. In T. F. Cash & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body image: a handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice (pp. 478–486). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar