Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 23, Issue 10, pp 2889–2898 | Cite as

Health status profiles in community-dwelling elderly using self-reported health indicators: a latent class analysis

  • Charis W. L. Ng
  • Nan Luo
  • Bee Hoon Heng
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Latent class analysis (LCA), a statistical method for identifying latent classes within a population using multiple indicators, has been used to study the heterogeneity of health among the elderly. We aim to identify health status profiles of older adults using LCA and examine the socio-demographic characteristics associated with each profile.

Methods

A community health survey of residents ≥60 years was conducted in Marine Parade, Singapore. We performed LCA on seven health indicators (number of chronic conditions, activities of daily living (ADL) dependency, pain, depression, cognition, social isolation, and frequency of socialising) to identify distinct classes of health status profiles. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to examine the socio-demographic characteristics associated with each profile.

Results

Of the 2,444 elderly interviewed, we identified two health status profiles: “Health at risk” (n = 465, 19.0 %), and “Relatively healthy” (n = 1,979, 81.0 %). The “Health at risk” profile was characterised by high probabilities of 3+ chronic conditions (λ = 0.63), at least one basic/instrumental ADL dependency (λ = 0.56), moderate/extreme pain (λ = 0.55), cognitive impairment (λ = 0.29), depressive symptoms (λ = 0.29), social isolation (λ = 0.27), and infrequent socialisation (λ = 0.61). Individuals who were older (65–74, 75–84, and 85+ years), females, of non-Chinese ethnicity (Indian, Malay, and Others), had primary and lower education, and were unemployed/not employed were more likely to be “Health at risk”.

Conclusion

Using LCA, we identified two distinct health status profiles which accounted for the heterogeneity of the elderly population. Selected socio-demographic characteristics were associated with different profiles and provide implications for the structuring of future public health interventions targeting the older population.

Keywords

Health status Elderly Latent class analysis Asia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was part of the Marine Parade Elderly Needs Survey Project, which was commissioned by the Agency for Integrated Care, Singapore.

References

  1. 1.
    Chan, A., Malhotra, C., Malhotra, R., & Ostbye, T. (2011). Living arrangements, social networks and depressive symptoms among older men and women in Singapore. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 26, 630–639.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    MCYS. (2006). Committee on ageing issues: Report on the ageing population. Singapore: MCYS. app.msf.gov.sg/Portals/0/Summary/research/CAI_report.pdf.
  3. 3.
    Orrell, M., & Hancock, G. A. (Eds.). (2004). CANE: The Camberwell assessment of need for the elderly. London: Gaskell.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    WHO. (2003). WHO definition of Health. Geneva: WHO (25 February 2013). http://www.who.int/about/definition/en/print.html.
  5. 5.
    Fried, L. P., Ferrucci, L., Darer, J., Williamson, J. D., & Anderson, G. (2004). Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: Implications for improved targeting and care. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 59(3), 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Inouye, S. K., Studenski, S., Tinetti, M. E., & Kuchel, G. A. (2007). Geriatric syndromes: Clinical, research and policy implications of a core geriatric concept. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 55(5), 780–791.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tomaka, J., Thompson, S., & Palacios, R. (2006). The relation of social isolation, loneliness, and social support to disease outcomes among the elderly. Journal of Aging and Health, 18(3), 359–384.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Topinkova, E. (2008). Aging, disability and frailty. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, 52(Suppl 1), 6–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lafortune, L., Beland, F., Bergman, H., & Ankri, J. (2009). Health status transitions in community-living elderly with complex care needs: A latent class approach. BMC Geriatrics, 9(6), 1–14.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mackenbach, J. P. (2006). Health inequalities: Europe in profile. http://www.who.int/social_determinants/resources/european_inequalities.pdf.
  11. 11.
    Wickrama, K. A. S., Mancini, J. A., Kwag, K., & Kwon, J. (2013). Heterogeneity in multidimensional health trajectories of late old years and socioeconomic stratification: A latent trajectory class analysis. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(2), 290–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Humphreys, E. (2008). Health inequalities and ageing in the community. Limerick, Ireland: University of Limerick & Mid-western Regional Hospital Limerick. http://www.hsyrc.com/Images/Updates/January2009/Ageing_FinalRpt.pdf.
  13. 13.
    Crimmins, E. M., Kim, J. K., & Seeman, T. E. (2009). Poverty and biological risk: The earlier “aging” of the poor. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 64A(2), 286–292.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ferraro, K. F., & Shippee, T. P. (2009). Aging and cumulative inequality: How does inequality get under the skin? The Gerontologist, 49(3), 333–343.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    George, P. P., Heng, B. H., Molina, J. A. D., Wong, L. Y., Ng, C. W. L., & Cheah, J. T. S. (2012). Self-reported chronic diseases and health status and health service utilisation—Results from a community health survey in Singapore. International Journal for Equity in Health, 11, 44.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wee, L. E., Yeo, W. X., Yang, G. R., Hannan, N., Lim, K., Chua, C., et al. (2012). Individual and area level socioeconomic status and its association with cognitive function and cognitive impairment (low MMSE) among community-dwelling elderly in Singapore. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra, 2, 529–542.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yong, V., Saito, Y., & Chan, A. (2011). Gender differences in health and health expectancies of older adults in Singapore: An examination of diseases, impairments, and functional disabilities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 26, 189–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu, L. F., Tian, W. H., & Yao, H. P. (2012). Utilisation of health care services by elderly people with National Health Insurance in Taiwan: The heterogeneous health profile approach. Health Policy, 108, 246–255. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.08.022.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schuz, B., Wurm, S., Warner, L. M., & Tesch-Romer, C. (2009). Health and subjective well-being in later adulthood: Different health states—Different needs? Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 1(1), 23–45.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    The Pennsylvania State University. (2012). Latent transition analysis (LTA). Pennsylvania, USA: The Pennsylvania State University (25 February 2013). http://methodology.psu.edu/ra/lta.
  21. 21.
    Muthen, B., & Muthen, L. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 24(6), 882–891.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ministry of Community Development Youth and Sports. (2005). National Survey of Senior Citizens 2005. Singapore: Ministry of Community Development Youth and Sports.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ministry of Health. (2007). National Health Surveillance Survey 2007. Singapore: Ministry of Health.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ng, T. P., Niti, M., Chiam, P. C., & Kua, E. H. (2006). Prevalence and correlates of functional disability in multiethnic elderly Singaporeans. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 54, 21–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rabin, R., Oemar, M., Oppe, M., & EuroQol Group Executive Office on behalf of the EuroQOL Group. (2011). EQ-5D-3L user guide: Basic information on how to use EQ-5D-3L instrument (Version 4.0). EuroQol Group. http://www.euroqol.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Documenten/PDF/Folders_Flyers/UserGuide_EQ-5D-3L.pdf.
  26. 26.
    Hodkinson, H. M. (1972). Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. Age and Ageing, 1(4), 233–238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chin, J. J. (2002). Screening for cognitive impairment in primary care: The role of objective cognitive tests. The Singapore Family Physician, 28(4), 62–68.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jitapunkul, S., Pillay, I., & Ebrahim, S. (1991). The abbreviated mental test: Its use and validity. Age and Ageing, 20, 332–336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lim, P. P. J., Ng, L. L., Chiam, P. C., Ong, P. S., Ngui, F. T. S., & Sahadevan, S. (2000). Validation and comparison of three brief depression scales in an elderly Chinese population. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, 824–830.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nyunt, M. S. Z., Fones, C., Niti, M., & Ng, T. P. (2009). Criterion-based validity and reliability of the Geriatric Depression Screening Scale (GDS-15) in a large validation sample of community-living Asian older adults. Aging and Mental Health, 13(3), 376–382.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Thilagaratnam, S., Ding, Y. Y., Au Eong, K. G., Chiam, P. C., Chow, Y. L., Khoo, G., et al. (2010). Health Promotion Board-Ministry of Health clinical practice guidelines: Functional screening for older adults in the community. Singapore Medical Journal, 51(6), 518–522.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Singapore Department of Statistics. (2011). Key household characteristics and household income trends. Singapore: Singapore Department of Statistics.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chang, W. C., Lu, F. P., Lan, T. Y., & Wu, S. C. (2012). Multidimensional health-transition patterns among a middle-aged and older population. Geriatrics Gerontology International,. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2012.00937.x.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lanza, S. T., Collins, L. M., Lemmon, D. R., & Schafer, J. L. (2007). PROC LCA: A SAS procedure for latent class analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 671–694.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chan, A., & Jatrana, S. (2007). Gender differences in health among older Singaporeans. International Sociology, 22(4), 463–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fong, C. W., Bhalla, V., Heng, D., Chua, A. V., Chan, M. L., & Chew, S. K. (2007). Educational inequalities associated with health-related behaviours in the adult population of Singapore. Singapore Medical Journal, 48(12), 1091–1099.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wister, A. V. (1996). The effects of socioeconomic status on exercise and smoking: Age-related differences. Journal of Aging and Health, 8(4), 467–488.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schwingel, A., Niti, M. M., Tang, C., & Ng, T. P. (2009). Continued work employment and volunteerism and mental well-being of older adults: Singapore longitudinal ageing studies. Age and Ageing, 38, 531–537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hagenaars, J. A., & McCutcheon, A. L. (Eds.). (2002). Applied latent class analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lafortune, L., Beland, F., Bergman, H., & Ankri, J. (2009). Health state profiles and service utilisation in community-living elderly. Medical Care, 47(3), 286–294.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Health Services & Outcomes ResearchNational Healthcare GroupSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Saw Swee Hock School of Public HealthNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations