Modeling life satisfaction in spinal cord injury: the role of psychological resources
The aims of the study were (1) to examine the associations between the psychological resources general self-efficacy (GSE) and purpose in life (PIL), appraisals, coping and life satisfaction, and (2) to examine whether the effects of the psychological resources on life satisfaction are mediated by appraisals and coping, as proposed by the spinal cord injury adjustment model (SCIAM).
Cross-sectional multicenter study conducted with persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) living in the community in Switzerland (N = 516). Pearson’s correlations were calculated for aim 1, and structural equation modeling was conducted to address aim 2.
GSE (r = .48) and PIL (r = .58) were positively related to life satisfaction. The initial model corresponding to the SCIAM yielded a poor model fit. The final model had a good model fit [χ 2 = 66.0, df = 21, p < .01, RMSEA = .065 (90 % confidence interval .048–.082), CFI = .97] explaining 57 % of variance of life satisfaction. PIL had a direct large effect on life satisfaction (β = .54). The influence of GSE on life satisfaction was mediated by loss appraisals. Avoidance, active and humor coping had small effects on life satisfaction.
Psychological resources have a substantial effect on life satisfaction in persons with SCI. Our results correspond with the SCIAM and its conceptualization of adjustment as a multifactorial process, but did not fully support the hypothesized mediation. PIL was strongly related to higher life satisfaction and may be a suitable intervention target to support persons with SCI.
KeywordsSpinal cord injuries Psychological adjustment (= adaptation, psychological) Self-efficacy Purpose in life Quality of life Structural models
This study has been financed in the framework of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI, www.swisci.ch), supported by the Swiss Paraplegic Association. The members of the SwiSCI Steering Committee are: Olivier Dériaz (Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion); Michael Baumberger and Hans Peter Gmünder (Swiss Paraplegic Center, Nottwil); Armin Curt and Martin Schubert (University Clinic Balgrist, Zürich); Kerstin Hug and Margret Hund-Georgiadis (REHAB Basel, Basel); Hans Georg Koch and Urs Styger (Swiss Paraplegic Association, Nottwil); Hardy Landolt (representative for persons with SCI, Glarus); Rita Schaumann-Von Stosch (SUVA, Luzern); Mirjam Brach and Gerold Stucki (Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil); and Martin Brinkhof and Christine Thyrian (SwiSCI Study Center at Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil). We are indebted to study participants and to the personnel of the SwiSCI study center.
- 1.Kirshblum, S., Campagnolo, D. I., & DeLisa, J. A. (2002). Spinal Cord Medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
- 4.van Leeuwen, C. M., Post, M. W., Hoekstra, T., van der Woude, L. H., de Groot, S., Snoek, G. J., et al. (2011). Trajectories in the course of life satisfaction after spinal cord injury: Identification and predictors. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(2), 207–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.de Roon-Cassini, T. A., de St Aubin, E., Valvano, A., Hastings, J., & Horn, P. (2009). Psychological well-being after spinal cord injury: Perception of loss and meaning making. Rehabilitation Psychology, 54(3), 306–314.Google Scholar
- 14.Middleton, J., & Craig, A. (2008). Psychological challenges in treating persons with spinal cord injury. In A. Craig & Y. Tran (Eds.), Psychological aspects associated with spinal cord injury rehabilitation: New directions and best evidence (pp. 3–53). New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc. Google Scholar
- 15.Frankl, V. E. (1959). Man’s search for meaning. NewYork: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
- 16.Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON.Google Scholar
- 17.van Leeuwen, C. M., Post, M. W., Westers, P., van der Woude, L. H., de Groot, S., Sluis, T., et al. (2012). Relationships between activities, participation, personal factors, mental health, and life satisfaction in persons with spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(1), 82–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Peter, C., Müller, R., Post, M. W., van Leeuwen, C. M., Werner, C. S., & Geyh, S. (2014). Psychological resources, appraisals and coping and their relationship to participation in spinal cord injury: A path analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.Google Scholar
- 24.Spungen, M. I., Libin, A., Ljungberg, I., & Groah, S. (2009). Self-efficacy mediating the occurrence of secondary conditions after spinal cord injury. SCI Psychosocial Process, 22(1), 16–22.Google Scholar
- 27.Ferguson, E., Matthews, G., & Cox, T. (1999). The appraisal of life events (ALE) scale: Reliability and validity. British Journal of Health Psychology, 4(Part 2), 97–116.Google Scholar
- 28.Gourounti, K., Anagnostopoulos, F., & Vaslamatzis, G. (2010). Primary appraisal of infertility: Evaluation of the psychometric properties of a Greek version of the appraisal of life events scale (ALE) in a sample of infertile women undergoing fertility treatment. Women and Health, 50(7), 688–704.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.WHOQOL Group (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL Group. Psychological Medicine, 28(3), 551–558.Google Scholar
- 32.Geyh, S., Fellinghauer, B. A. G., Kirchberger, I., & Post, M. W. M. (2010). Cross-cultural validity of four quality of life scales in persons with spinal cord injury. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8(94), 1–16.Google Scholar
- 33.R Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
- 34.Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.Google Scholar
- 35.Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge Academic.Google Scholar
- 38.Sica, C., Magni, C., Ghisi, M., Altoè, G., Sighinolfi, C., Chiri, L. R., et al. (2008). Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced-Nuova Versione Italiana (COPE-NVI): uno strumento per la misura degli stili di coping. Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale, 14(1), 27–53.Google Scholar
- 39.Revelle, W. (2012). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric and personality research. http://personality-project.org/r/psych.manual.pdf.
- 44.Pornprasertmanit, S., Miller, P., & Schoemann, A. (2013). R package simsem: SIMulated structural equation modeling (version 0.5-3). http://cran.r-project.org/package=simsem.
- 50.Thompson, N. J., Coker, J., Krause, J. S., & Henry, E. (2003). Purpose in life as a mediator of adjustment after spinal cord injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 48, 100–108.Google Scholar
- 51.Hampton, N. Z., & Marshall, A. (2000). Culture, gender, self-efficacy, and life satisfaction: A comparison between Americans and Chinese people with spinal cord injuries. Journal of Rehabilitation, 66(3), 21–28.Google Scholar
- 53.Livneh, H., & Martz, E. (2012). Adjustment to chronic illness and disability: Theoretical perspectives, empirical findings, and unresolved issues. In P. Kennedy (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Rehabilitation Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 55.Leventhal, H., Meyer, D., & Nerenz, D. (1980). The common sense model of illness danger. In S. Rachman (Ed.), Medical psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 7–30). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- 56.Maes, S., Leventhal, H., & De Ridder, D. T. D. (1996). Coping with chronic diseases. In M. Zeidner & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications (pp. 221–251). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
- 62.Ruiz, F. J. (2010). A review of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) empirical evidence: Correlational, experimental psychopathology, component and outcome studies. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 10(1), 125–162.Google Scholar
- 63.Ruiz, F. J. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy versus traditional cognitive behavioral therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of current empirical evidence. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 12(3), 333–357.Google Scholar
- 64.Sharp, K. (2012). A review of acceptance and commitment therapy with anxiety disorders. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 12(3), 359–372.Google Scholar
- 65.Zahl, M. L., Compton, D. M., Kim, K., & Rosenbluth, J. P. (2008). SCI/D forum to increase active living: The effect of a self-efficacy and self-affirmation based SCI/D forum on active living in adults with spinal cord injury/disease. SCI Psychosocial Process, 21(2), 5–13.Google Scholar
- 66.Rose, A., Piatt, J. A., Zahl, M., & Kim, K. (2008). The effect of a self-efficacy based forum on life satisfaction for individuals with spinal cord injury or disease. Annual in Therapeutic Recreation, 16, 49–56.Google Scholar