Feasibility, reliability and validity of the Chinese simplified version of the MOS-HIV health survey among AIDS patients in China
To test the feasibility, reliability and validity of the Chinese simplified version of the MOS-HIV health survey among AIDS patients in China.
A cross-sectional survey of 120 patients receiving highly active antiretroviral treatment was conducted. Feasibility was assessed using the time of administration and the response rate. Reliability was estimated using Cronbach’s α. Validity was analyzed by construct and discriminant validity.
The time of administration was about 12 min, and the response rate was 100%. The MOS-HIV showed a good internal reliability and Cronbach’s α of eight multi-item scales ranged from 0.75 to 0.91. Correlations between scales were all significant. The majority of the correlations between pairs of scales were within the acceptable range (0.4–0.8). The scores of role function, pain, physical health summary scales were significantly higher for patients with time on antiretroviral treatment >1 year compared to those with time ≤1 year. Patients >40 years had significantly higher scores than those of ≤40 years on energy and mental health summary scales.
The Chinese simplified version of MOS-HIV health survey had good feasibility, reliability and validity. It was successfully adapted for AIDS patients in rural areas and could be a valuable tool in evaluating the quality of life of AIDS patients.
KeywordsFeasibility Reliability Validity MOS-HIV AIDS China
Human immunodeficiency virus
Acquired immuno deficiency syndrome
Highly active antiretroviral treatment
Health-related quality of life
Quality of life
Medical Outcomes Study HIV health survey
People living with HIV and AIDS
The authors wish to acknowledge all respondents in this study and Wang-dong Xu and Mo Zhou for their assistance in study preparation and the collection, processing and inputting of data. In addition, special thanks to the staff of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Linquan Country for their advice and help in the coordination and implementation of the study. The research was supported by the Global Fund for AIDS program in Anhui, China (CHN-607-G10-H).
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
- 2.Palella, F. J., Jr., Delaney, K. M., Moorman, A. C., Loveless, M. O., Fuhrer, J., Satten, G. A., et al. (1998). Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. HIV outpatient study investigators. New England Journal of Medicine, 338, 853–860.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Song, Y. C., & Meng, Y. J. (2008). Introduction on quality of life scale for patients with HIV. Modern Preventive Medicine, 16, 3182–3184.Google Scholar
- 5.Chariyalertsak, S., Wansom, T., Kawichai, S., Ruangyuttikarna, C., Kemerer, V. F., & Wu, A. W. (2011). Reliability and validity of Thai versions of the MOS-HIV and SF-12 quality of life questionnaires in people living with HIV/AIDS. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9, 15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Badía, X., Podzamczer, D., López-Lavid, C., & García, M. (1999). Evidence-based medicine and the validation of quality-of-life questionnaires: The Spanish version of the MOS-HIV questionnaire for the evaluation of the quality of life in patients infected by HIV. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologia Clinica, 17(Suppl 2), 103–113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Luo, L., & Li, T. S. (2010). Overview of antiretroviral treatment in China: Advancement and challenges. Chinese Medical Journal, 124, 440–444.Google Scholar
- 15.Yang, F., Liu, Q., Jia, W. D., & Xu, H. F. (2007). Assessment on reliability and validity of simplified Chinese version of MOS-HIV. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 23, 981–982.Google Scholar
- 18.Yu, D., & Liu, M. (2009). Quality of life in AIDS patients receiving HAART. Chinese Journal of AIDS & STD, 15, 331–334.Google Scholar