A 7-item version of the fatigue severity scale has better psychometric properties among HIV-infected adults: an application of a Rasch model
- 333 Downloads
To examine the psychometric properties of the 9-item Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) using a Rasch model application.
A convenience sample of HIV-infected adults was recruited, and a subset of the sample was assessed at 6-month intervals for 2 years. Socio-demographic, clinical, and symptom data were collected by self-report questionnaires. CD4 T-cell count and viral load measures were obtained from medical records. The Rasch analysis included 316 participants with 698 valid questionnaires.
FSS item 2 did not advanced monotonically, and items 1 and 2 did not show acceptable goodness-of-fit to the Rasch model. A reduced FSS 7-item version demonstrated acceptable goodness-of-fit and explained 61.2% of the total variance in the scale. In the FSS-7 item version, no uniform Differential Item Functioning was found in relation to time of evaluation or to any of the socio-demographic or clinical variables.
This study demonstrated that the FSS-7 has better psychometric properties than the FSS-9 in this HIV sample and that responses to the different items are comparable over time and unrelated to socio-demographic and clinical variables.
KeywordsFatigue HIV Psychometrics Symptoms Quality of life
Acquired immune deficiency syndrome
Body mass index
Differential item functioning
Daytime sleepiness subscale
Fatigue severity scale
General sleep disturbance scale
Human immunodeficiency virus
Principal component analysis
This research was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH, 5 R01 MH074358). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Mental Health or the National Institutes of Health. Data collection was supported by the General Clinical Research Center in the UCSF CTSA (1 UL RR024131). Dr. Lerdal has received funding from the Research Council of Norway (Grant # 19256), the Norwegian Nurses Organization and the U.S.–Norway Fulbright Foundation. Dr. Aouizerat is supported by an NIH Roadmap K12 (KL2 RR024130). Authors wish to acknowledge the contributions to the study from Traci Coggins, Skip Davis, Ryan Kelly, Yeonsu Song, Kristen Nelson, and Matthew Shullick.
- 2.Marcellin, F., Preau, M., Ravaux, I., Dellamonica, P., Spire, B., & Carrieri, M. P. (2007). Self-reported fatigue and depressive symptoms as main indicators of the quality of life (QOL) of patients living with HIV and Hepatitis C: Implications for clinical management and future research. HIV Clinical Trials, 8, 320–327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Barroso, J., Hammill, B. G., Leserman, J., Salahuddin, N., Harmon, J. L., & Pence, B. W. (2010). Physiological and psychosocial factors that predict HIV-related fatigue. AIDS Behavior.Google Scholar
- 21.Rabkin, J. G., McElhiney, M. C., Rabkin, R., & McGrath, P. J. (2010). Modafinil treatment for fatigue in HIV/AIDS: A randomized placebo-controlled study. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry.Google Scholar
- 26.Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model. Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahawah, New Jersey: Erlbaum Publishers.Google Scholar
- 27.Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago: MESA Press.Google Scholar
- 28.Linacre, J. M. (2006). Winsteps computer program, Version 3.63.0. Chicago: Rasch Measurement.Google Scholar
- 29.Linacre, J. M. (2010). Winstep—Rasch model computer program. Version 184.108.40.206. http://www.winsteps.com, 2010 Retrieved June 2010.
- 30.Spector, P. E. (1992). Summated rating scale construction: An introduction. Beverly Hills and London: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- 31.Linacre, J. M. (2004). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. In E. V. Smith & R. M. Smith (Eds.), Introduction to Rasch measurement: Theory, models and applications (pp. 258–278). Maple Grove: JAM Press Publisher.Google Scholar
- 33.Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
- 34.Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement. Chicago: MESA Press.Google Scholar
- 38.Linacre, J. M. (2005). Rasch-model computer programs. Internet 2005. Retrieved June 5, 2007, available from: URL: http://www.winsteps.com.
- 39.Smith, R. M., & Miao, C. Y. (1994). Assessing unidimensionality for Rasch measurement. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Objective measurement: Theory into practice. Greenwich: Ablex.Google Scholar
- 40.Raiche, G. (2005). Critical eigenvalue sizes in standardized residual prinicipal component analysis. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 19, 1012.Google Scholar
- 46.Lerdal, A. (2009). Energy and fatigue in individuals with multiple sclerosis—a multi-method approach. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag D. Müller.Google Scholar
- 53.Silverberg, M. J., Jacobson, L. P., French, A. L., Witt, M. D., & Gange, S. J. (2009). Age and racial/ethnic differences in the prevalence of reported symptoms in human immunodeficiency virus-infected persons on antiretroviral therapy. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 38, 197–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar