Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 21, Issue 10, pp 1705–1711 | Cite as

Sex differences in the change in health-related quality of life associated with low back pain

  • Rei Ono
  • Takahiro Higashi
  • Osamu Takahashi
  • Yasuharu Tokuda
  • Takuro Shimbo
  • Hiroyoshi Endo
  • Shigeaki Hinohara
  • Tsuguya Fukui
  • Shunichi Fukuhara
Article

Abstract

Purpose

To examine the sex differences in the impact of low back pain (LBP) on health-related quality of life among community-dwelling persons from a nationwide sample.

Methods

Our analysis enrolled 2,358 participants from among 3,477 randomly selected subjects in Japan. The cumulative days each individual experienced LBP were prospectively measured over 1 month. The Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) in the Short Form 8-item Health Survey were evaluated before and after the study period. Sex differences in the impact of the cumulative number of LBP days on PCS and MCS scores were evaluated using linear regression analysis.

Results

Among the 2,170 participants with complete data, the prevalence of LBP in women (32%) was higher than that in men (25%) during the study period. One-day increases in LBP days were associated with greater decreases in PCS scores among men than among women (−0.72 vs. −0.29, sex difference P < 0.001). In contrast, no relationship was noted between the number of LBP days and the change in MCS score for either sex after adjustment.

Conclusions

Although a greater incidence of LBP was noted in women, health-related quality of life was more seriously affected in men with the same number of days with LBP in the month.

Keywords

Low back pain Sex differences SF-8 PCS MCS 

Abbreviations

LBP

Low back pain

HRQOL

Health-related quality of life

HDS

Health Diary Study

SF-8

Medical Outcome Study Short Form 8-item Health Survey

PCS

Physical health component summary

MCS

Mental health component summary

LOWESS

Locally weighted scatter plot smoothing

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Health Diary Study was supported by a research grant from the St. Luke’s Life Science Institute.

References

  1. 1.
    Sprangers, M. A., de Regt, E. B., Andries, F., van Agt, H. M., Bijl, R. V., de Boer, J. B., et al. (2000). Which chronic conditions are associated with better or poorer quality of life? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53(9), 895–907.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alonso, J., Ferrer, M., Gandek, B., Ware, J. E., Jr., Aaronson, N. K., Mosconi, P., et al. (2004). Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: results from the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Quality of Life Research, 13(2), 283–298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hart, L. G., Deyo, R. A., & Cherkin, D. C. (1995). Physician office visits for low back pain. Spine, 20(1), 11–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Walker, B. F., Muller, R., & Grant, W. D. (2003). Low back pain in Australian adults: The economic burden. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 15(2), 79–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maniadakis, N., & Gray, A. (2000). The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain, 84(1), 95–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fanuele, J. C., Birkmeyer, N. J., Abdu, W. A., Tosteson, T. D., & Weinstein, J. N. (2000). The impact of spinal problems on the health status of patients: Have we underestimated the effect? Spine, 25(12), 1509–1514.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Veerapen, K., Wigley, R. D., & Valkenburg, H. (2007). Musculoskeletal pain in Malaysia: A COPCORD survey. Journal of Rheumatology, 34(1), 207–213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chenot, J. F., Becker, A., Leonhardt, C., Keller, S., Donner-Banzhoff, N., Hildebrandt, J., et al. (2008). Sex differences in presentation, course, and management of low back pain in primary care. Clinical Journal of Pain, 24(7), 578–584.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Linton, S. J., Hellsing, A. L., & Halldén, K. (1998). A population-based study of spinal pain among 35–45-year-old individuals. Prevalence, sick leave, and health care use. Spine, 23(13), 1457–1463.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Müllersdorf, M., & Söderback, I. (2000). The actual state of the effects, treatment and incidence of disabling pain in a gender perspective—A Swedish study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22(18), 840–854.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wise, E. A., Price, D. D., Myers, C. D., Heft, M. W., & Robinson, M. E. (2002). Gender role expectations of pain: relationship to experimental pain perception. Pain, 96(3), 335–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Riley, J. L., 3rd, Robinson, M. E., Wise, E. A., Myers, C. D., & Fillingim, R. B. (1998). Sex differences in the perception of noxious experimental stimuli: A meta-analysis. Pain, 74(2–3), 181–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Affleck, G., Tennen, H., Keefe, F. J., Lefebvre, J. C., Kashikar-Zuck, S., Wright, K., et al. (1999). Everyday life with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis: Independent effects of disease and gender on daily pain, mood, and coping. Pain, 83(3), 601–609.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keefe, F. J., Affleck, G., France, C. R., Emery, C. F., Waters, S., Caldwell, D. S., et al. (2004). Gender differences in pain, coping, and mood in individuals having osteoarthritic knee pain: A within-day analysis. Pain, 110(3), 571–577.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Salaffi, F., De Angelis, R., Stancati, A., Grassi, W., & MArche Pain Prevalence INvestigation Group (MAPPING) study. (2005). Health-related quality of life in multiple musculoskeletal conditions: a cross-sectional population based epidemiological study. II. The MAPPING study. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 23(6), 829–839.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bingefors, K., & Isacson, D. (2004). Epidemiology, co-morbidity, and impact on health-related quality of life of self-reported headache and musculoskeletal pain–a gender perspective. European Journal of Pain, 8(5), 435–450.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fukui, T., Rhaman, M., Takahashi, O., Saito, M., Shinbo, T., Endo, H., et al. (2005). The ecology of medical care in Japan. JMAJ, 48, 163–167.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fukuhara, S., & Suzukamo, Y. (2004). SF-8 Japanese version manual. Kyoto: NPO Health Medicine Evaluation Research Organization.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., Dewey, J. E., & Gandek, B. (2001). How to score and interpret single-item health status measures: A manual for users of the SF-8 health survey. Lincoln, (RI): QualityMetric Incorporated.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Diggle, P. J., Heagerty, P., Liang, K. Y., & Zeger, S. L. (2002). Exploring longitudinal data. In P. J. Diggle, P. Heagerty, K. Y. Liang, & S. Zeger (Eds.), Analysis of longitudinal data, 2nd edn (pp. 33–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pereira, C. C., Palta, M., Mullahy, J., & Fryback, D. G. (2011). Race and preference-based health-related quality of life measures in the United States. Quality of Life Research, 20(6), 969–978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rampersaud, Y. R., Ravi, B., Lewis, S. J., Stas, V., Barron, R., Davey, R., et al. (2008). Assessment of health-related quality of life after surgical treatment of focal symptomatic spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. The Spine Journal, 8(2), 296–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bachmeier, C. J., March, L. M., Cross, M. J., Lapsley, H. M., Tribe, K. L., Courtenay, B. G., et al. (2001). A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 9(2), 137–146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Edwards, R., Augustson, E. M., & Fillingim, R. (2000). Sex-specific effects of pain-related anxiety on adjustment to chronic pain. Clinical Journal of Pain, 16(1), 46–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Robinson, M. E., Dannecker, E. A., George, S. Z., Otis, J., Atchison, J. W., & Fillingim, R. B. (2005). Sex differences in the associations among psychological factors and pain report: A novel psychophysical study of patients with chronic low back pain. J Pain, 6(7), 463–470.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Skevington, S. M. (1998). Investigating the relationship between pain and discomfort and quality of life, using the WHOQOL. Pain, 76(3), 395–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Heymans, M. W., van Buuren, S., Knol, D. L., Anema, J. R., van Mechelen, W., & de Vet, H. C. (2010). The prognosis of chronic low back pain is determined by changes in pain and disability in the initial period. The Spine Journal, 10(10), 847–856.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rei Ono
    • 1
    • 2
  • Takahiro Higashi
    • 3
  • Osamu Takahashi
    • 4
  • Yasuharu Tokuda
    • 5
  • Takuro Shimbo
    • 6
  • Hiroyoshi Endo
    • 7
  • Shigeaki Hinohara
    • 8
  • Tsuguya Fukui
    • 8
  • Shunichi Fukuhara
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Community Health SciencesKobe University Graduate School of Health SciencesKobe, HyogoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology and Health Care Research, Graduate School of Medicine and Public HealthKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Public Health/Health PolicyUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Department of Internal MedicineSt. Luke’s International HospitalTokyoJapan
  5. 5.Institute of Clinical Medicine, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human SciencesUniversity of TsukubaIbarakiJapan
  6. 6.Research InstituteInternational Medical Center of JapanTokyoJapan
  7. 7.Department of International Affairs and Tropical MedicineTokyo Women’s Medical University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
  8. 8.St. Luke’s Life Science InstituteSt. Luke’s International HospitalTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations