Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 359–369 | Cite as

Associations between living arrangements and health-related quality of life of urban elderly people: a study from China

  • Xiaojie Sun
  • Henry Lucas
  • Qingyue Meng
  • Yaoguang Zhang
Article

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for elderly men and women in three mutually exclusive living arrangements: living alone, living only with spouse, and non-empty-nesters. It also examined whether such living arrangements and other factors relating to social interaction have an independent influence on HRQOL after controlling for other variables.

Methods

The data were drawn from China’s 4th National Household Health Survey (NHHS) conducted in 2008. The final sample included 9,711 urban elderly people of 60 years and above. The EQ-5D inventory was used to measure health-related quality of life.

Results

The proportions of non-empty-nested men and women both changed following a ‘U’-shaped curve with the increasing age. Controlling for other variables not including social interaction indicators, “living alone” was a significant predictor of reporting problems on Mobility, Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression. After introducing social interaction indicators, urban older adults ‘having close contact with neighbors every week’ had lower odds of problems on all five EQ-5D indicators, those ‘having close contact with friends and relatives’ had lower odds of problems on Mobility, Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression, and those ‘taking part in social activities every week’ had lower odds of problems on all dimensions but Anxiety/Depression. In addition, after introducing social interaction indicators, the odds of reported problems on the three dimensions increased obviously.

Conclusions

This study suggests that the most vulnerable urban older adults are those who live entirely on their own. Frequent social interaction may buffer the negative effect of living alone on HRQOL of older adults. Policies that attempt to build harmonious neighborhoods, extend older adults’ social network and encourage them to take part in social activities should be considered by the policy-makers in the future.

Keywords

China Residence characteristics Health-related quality of life Aged Interpersonal relations 

Abbreviations

HRQOL

Health-related quality of life

NHHS

National Household Health Survey

CHSI

Center for Health Statistics and Information

EQ-5D

European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions

SI

Social interaction

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the China Medical Board (CMB), and the Center for Health Statistics and Information (CHSI) of the Chinese Ministry of Health provided support for the analyses and writing of this article.

Disclosure statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

References

  1. 1.
    Kinsella, K., & Wan, H. (2009). An Aging World: 2008 (International Population Reports, P95/09-1). U.S. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2010). 2009 National Economic and Social Development Statistics Bulletin. Retrieved from http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjgb/ndtjgb/qgndtjgb/t20100225_402622945.htm. Accessed 25 Feb 2010.
  3. 3.
    National population and family planning commission of China. Prediction of the population over 65 from 2001 to 2050. Retrieved from http://www.china.com.cn/aboutchina/zhuanti/zgrk/2008-05/04/content_15056728.htm.
  4. 4.
    Center for Health Statistics and Information, Ministry of Health, China. (2009). An analysis report of National Health Service survey in China, 2008. Beijing: China Union Medical University.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ding, H. X. (2008). The empty-nested households are drawing near you and me. Retrieved from http://www.zgxcfx.com/Article_Show.asp?ArticleID=12746. Accessed 10 Oct 2008.
  6. 6.
    Zhu, X. H., Yu, C. M., Jiang, W. L., et al. (2006). Investigation on the healthy status of the elderly in empty-nest family and community nursing need. Journal of Nursing Science, 21(8), 69–70.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis, M. A., Moritz, D. J., Neuhaus, J. M., et al. (1997). Living arrangements, changes in living arrangements, and survival among community dwelling older adults. American Journal of Public Health, 87(3), 371–377.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Michael, Y., Berkman, L. F., Colditz, G. A., et al. (2001). Living arrangements, social integration, and change in functional health status. American Journal of Epidemiology, 153(2), 123–131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sarwari, A. R., Fredman, L., Langenberg, P., et al. (1998). Prospective study on the relation between living arrangement and change in functional health status of elderly women. American Journal of Epidemiology, 147(4), 370–378.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lund, R., Due, P., Modvig, J., et al. (2002). Cohabitation and marital status as predictors of mortalitydan eight year follow-up study. Social Science and Medicine, 55(4), 673–679.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Waite, L. J., & Hughes, M. E. (1999). At risk on the cusp of old age: Living arrangements and functional status among Black, White and Hispanic adults. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 54B(3), S136–S144.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kharicha, K., Iliffe, S., Harari, D., et al. (2007). Health risk appraisal in older people: Are older people living alone an ‘at-risk’ group? British Journal of General Practice, 57(537), 271–276.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brown, J. W., Liang, J., Krause, N., et al. (2002). Transitions in living arrangements among elders in Japan: Does health make a difference? The journals of gerontology, 57(4), S209–S220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berkman, L. F. (2000). Which influences cognitive function: Living alone or being alone? Lancet, 355(9212), 1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    de-Belvis, A. G., Avolio, M., Spagnolo, A., et al. (2008). Factors associated with health-related quality of life: The role of social relationships among the elderly in an Italian region. Public Health, 122(8), 784–793.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xu, X. (1995). The causes of the empty-nested households and related accommodations. Social Science Research, (5), 96.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xiao, H. S. (1995). The causes and development trend of the empty-nest phenomenon in China. Population Research, 19(5), 13–16.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tang, L. (2002). New “Empty––Nest” family: A noteworthy social demographic phenomenon. Population Research, 26(4), 36–39.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen, M. X., & Yang, L. (2003). On the empty-nest phenomenon in the process of modernization. Changbai Journal, (6), 60–63.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xiong, H. F. (1998). The empty-nested households: The elderly group who should be paid attention to. Population Research, 22(3), 51.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhao, F., & Xu, Y. (2003). The analysis of the elderly’s life patterns and social support system in empty nest family. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science), (3), 63–67.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Feng, T., & Chen, M. (2008). The comprehensive evaluation and analysis on life quality of empty-nest elderly in Xiamen City. South China Population, 23(2), 37–43.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li, L. W., Zhang, J., & Liang, J. (2009). Health among the oldest-old in China: Which living arrangements make a difference? Social Sciences & Medicine, 68(2), 220–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kincannon, C., He, W., & West, L. (2005). Demography of aging in china and the United States and the economic well-being of their older populations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 20(3), 243–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li, J. J., Huang, R. G., & Feng, A. (2007). A study of urban community heterogeneity and neighborhood social capital. Fudan Journal (Social Science), 5(5), 67–73.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang, Y. (2002). A case study on urban community in Shanghai-Community classification, spatial distributionand changing tendencies. Urban Planning Forum, (6), 33–40.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Apter, A. J., Reisine, S. T., Affleck, G., et al. (1999). The influence of demographic and socioeconomic factors on health-related quality of life in asthma. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 103(1), 72–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ketelaars, C. A., Schlösser, M. A., Mostert, R., et al. (1996). Determinants of health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax, 51, 39–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Casellas, F., López, V. J., Casado, A., et al. (2002). Factors affecting health related quality of life of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Quality of Life Research, 11(8), 775–781.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Johansson, P., Dahlstrom, U., & Brostrom, A. (2006). Factors and interventions influencing health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure: A review of the literature. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 5(1), 5–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chen, J. L. (2008). A commentary on the study of China’s “empty nest” families. Tianfu New Idea, (2), 105–109.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sapin, C. B. F., Marie-Laure, N., et al. (2004). Usefulness of EQ-5D in assessing health status in primary care patients with major depressive disorder. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2, 20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Agt, V. H., Essink-Bot, M. L., Krabbe, P., et al. (2005). Test-retest reliability of health state valuations collected with the EuroQol questionnaire. In P. Kind, R. Brooks, & R. Rabin (Eds.), EQ-5D concepts and methods: A developmental history. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zeng, Y. C., Ching, S. S., & Loke, A. Y. (2010). Quality of life measurement in women with cervical cancer: Implications for Chinese cervical cancer survivors. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Norman, R., Cronin, P., Viney, R., et al. (2009). International comparisons in valuing EQ-5D health states: A review and analysis. Value in Health, 12(8), 1194–1200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Craig, B. M., Busschbach, J. J., & Salomon, J. A. (2009). Modeling ranking, time trade-off and visual analogue scale values for EQ-5D health states: A review and comparison of methods. Medical Care, 47(6), 634–641.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhao, F. L., Yue, M., Yang, H., et al. (2010). Validation and comparison of EuroQol and short form 6D in chronic prostatitis patients. Value in Health, 13(5), 649–656.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang, H., Kindig, D. A., & Mullahy, J. (2005). Variation in Chinese population health related quality of life: Results from a EuroQol study in Beijing, China. Quality of Life Research, 14(1), 119–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Luo, N., Chew, L. H., Fong, K. Y., et al. (2003). Validity and reliability of the EQ-5D self-report questionnaire in Chinese-speaking patients with rheumatic diseases in Singapore. Annals Academic Medicine Singapore, 32, 685–690.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gao, F., Ng, G. Y., Cheung, Y. B., et al. (2008). The Singaporean English and Chinese versions of the EQ-5D achieved measurement equivalence in cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 206–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ong, S. C., Lim, S. G., & Li, S. C. (2010). Reliability and validity of a Chinese version’s health-related quality of life questionnaire for hepatitis B patients. Value in Health, 13(2), 324–327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and application. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1995). Multiple significance tests: The Bonferroni method. BMJ, 310, 170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Annan, K. (1999). UN press release SG/SM/6893. New York: United Nation.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sarma, S., Hawley, G., & Basu, K. (2009). Transitions in living arrangements of Canadian seniors: Findings from the NPHS longitudinal data. Social Science and Medicine, 68(6), 1106–1113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bowling, A., Banister, D., Sutton, S., et al. (2002). A multidimensional model of the quality of life in older age. Aging & mental health, 6(4), 355–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Garcia, E. L., Banegas, J. R., Perez-Regadera, A. G., et al. (2005). Social network and health-related quality of life in older adults: A population-based study in Spain. Quality of Life Research, 14(2), 511–520.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sun, L., & Lei, T. (2007). A study on the neighborhood ties of Beijing urban residents in old city zone. Urban Problems, (2), 56–59.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hughes, M. E., & Waite, L. J. (2002). Health in household context: Living arrangements and health in late middle age. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(1), 1–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Murphy, M., Grundy, E., & Kalogirou, S. (2007). The increase in marital status differences in mortality up to the oldest age in seven European countries, 1990–99. Population Studies, 61(3), 287–298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pillemar, K., Moen, P., Wethington, E., et al. (2000). Social integration in the second half of life. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Li, D., Chen, T., & Wu, Z. (2006). Comparison of life and psychological status of the elderly between families with children absent and families with children. Chinese Journal of Gerontology, 26(3), 294–296.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    De Jong Gierveld, J. (2003). Social networks and social well-being of older men and women living alone. In S. Arber, K. Davidson, & J. Ginn (Eds.), Gender and ageing changing roles and relationships. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wenger, G. C. (1984). The supportive network: Coping with old age. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Burnette, D., & Mui, A. C. (1996). Psychological well-being among three successive cohorts of older American women who live alone. Journal of Women & Aging, 8(1), 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hall, M., & Havens, B. (2001). The effects of social isolation and loneliness on the health of older women. Winnipeg: Centres of Excellence for Women’s Health.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Barnes, M., Blom, A., Cox, K., et al. (2006). The social exclusion of older people: Evidence from the first wave of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). London: Social Exclusion Unit, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Grundy, E. (1999). Changing role of the family and community in providing support for the elderly. In R. Cliquet & M. Nizamuddin (Eds.), Population ageing. Challenges for policies and programmes in developed and developing countries. New York: UNFPA.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hahn, B. A. (1993). Marital status and women’s health, the effect of economic and marital acquisitions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 495–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaojie Sun
    • 1
    • 2
  • Henry Lucas
    • 3
  • Qingyue Meng
    • 2
  • Yaoguang Zhang
    • 4
  1. 1.The Postdoctoral Station of Applied Economics of Shandong UniversityJinanChina
  2. 2.Center for Health Management and PolicyShandong UniversityJinanChina
  3. 3.Institute of Development StudiesUniversity of SussexBrightonUK
  4. 4.Center for Health Statistics and Information, Ministry of HealthBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations