Utility of the twelve-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II) for discriminating depression “caseness” and severity in Spanish primary care patients
- 253 Downloads
The 12-item WHO-DAS II was developed to assess the activity limitations and participation restrictions experienced by individuals irrespective of medical diagnosis. In this paper we examine the known-groups’ validity of the instrument by evaluating its ability to discriminate between patients with/without major depression, patients with depression with/without medical comorbidity, and patients with depression with different depression severity.
The participants were 3,615 PC patients from 17 regions of Spain, with a first-time diagnosis of major depressive episode according to the general practitioner. The 12-item WHO-DAS II, the PHQ-9, and a chronic medical conditions checklist were administered during the consultation.
The statistical analyses indicated that the 12-item WHO-DAS II was able to discriminate between patients with/without depression and between those with different depression severity. The ROC analysis revealed that with a cutoff score ≥50, the instrument correctly classified 70.4% of the sample (area under the ROC curve = .76; sensitivity = 71.4%; specificity = 67.6%).
Overall, our results support the discriminant validity of the 12-item WHO-DAS II for major depression, being quite recommendable its use in epidemiological research.
Keywords12-item WHO-DAS II Primary health care Depression Disability
H. Lundbeck A/S funded this study.
- 1.Mathers, C. D., & Loncar, D. (2005). Updated projections of global mortality and burden of disease, 2002–2030: data sources, methods and results. Geneva: World Health Organization (Evidence and Information for Policy Working Paper).Google Scholar
- 6.Ansseau, M., Fischler, B., Dierick, M., Albert, A., Leyman, S., & Mignon, A. (2007). Socioeconomic correlates of generalized anxiety disorder and major depression in primary care: the GADIS II study (generalized anxiety and depression impact survey II). Depression and Anxiety, 26, 1–8.Google Scholar
- 7.Serrano-Blanco, A., Palao, D.J., Luciano, J.V., Pinto-Meza, A., Luján, L., Fernández, A., Roura, P., Bertsch, J., Mercader, M., Haro, J.M. (2009). Prevalence of mental disorders in primary care: Results from the diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders in primary care study (DASMAP). Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. May 19. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
- 12.World Health Organization. (2000). Disability assessment schedule II (WHO-DAS II). Geneva: WHO. http://www.who.int/icidh/whodas/whodasversions/12int.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2008.
- 13.World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO. http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/. Accessed 9 May 2008.
- 16.Luciano, J.V., Ayuso-Mateos, J.L., Fernández A., Serrano-Blanco, A., Roca, M., Haro, J.M. (2009). Psychometric properties of the twelve item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II) in Spanish primary care patients with a first major depressive episode. Journal of Affective Disorders. May 21. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
- 17.Vázquez-Barquero, J. L., Vázquez Bourgón, E., Herrera Saiz, J., Uriarte, M., Morales, F., Gaite, L., et al. (2000). Spanish version of the new World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS-II): Initial phase of development and pilot study. Cantabria disability work group. Actas Españolas de Psiquiatria, 28, 77–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Association, American. Psychiatric. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
- 23.Luciano, J.V., Bertsch, J., Salvador-Carulla, S., Fernandez, A., Pinto-Meza, A., Haro, J.M., Palao, D.J., Serrano-Blanco, A. Factor structure, internal consistency and construct validity of the Sheehan disability scale in a spanish primary care sample. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (In press).Google Scholar