The concurrent validity and responsiveness of the health utilities index (HUI 3) among patients with advanced HIV/AIDS
- 124 Downloads
To assess the concurrent validity and responsiveness of the Health Utility Index 3 (HUI3) in patients with advanced HIV/AIDS, and to determine the responsiveness of this measure, the MOS-HIV and EQ-5D to HIV-related clinical events.
Data from the OPTIMA (OPTions In Management with Antiretrovirals) trial was analyzed. Two aspects of the validity of the HUI3 were considered: concurrent validity was evaluated using Spearman correlations with MOS-HIV component and summary scores. Responsiveness to AIDS-defining events (ADE) and all adverse events (our external change criterion) was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves.
The study enrolled 368 patients (mean follow-up: 3.66 years); 82% had at least one severe adverse event and 27% had at least one ADE. The HUI3 scale and items showed good concurrent validity, with 85% of the expected relationships with the MOS-HIV subscales verified. The HUI3 was responsive to both adverse events (AUROC [95%CI]: 0.68 [0.57, 0.80]) and ADEs (0.62 [0.51, 0.74]). The EQ-5D was responsive to ADEs (0.66 [0.56, 0.76]), but not responsive to adverse events (0.56 [0.46, 0.68]).
The HUI3 is a valid and responsive measure of the change in HRQoL associated with clinical events in an advanced HIV/AIDS population.
KeywordsHealth utilities index MOS-HIV EQ-5D HIV/AIDS
Human immunodeficiency virus
Acquired immune deficiency syndrome
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
Mental health score
Physical health score
The OPTIMA study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Canada), Cooperative Studies Program of the US Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration (USA), and the Office of Research and Development, Cooperative Studies Program, United Kingdom Medical Research Council. BN was supported by doctoral research awards from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the Research in Addictions and Mental Health Policy & Services CIHR strategic training initiative.
- 7.Kyriakides, T. C., Babiker, A., Singer, J., Cameron, W., Schechter, M. T., Holodniy, M., et al. (2003). An open-label randomized clinical trial of novel therapeutic strategies for HIV-infected patients in whom antiretroviral therapy has failed: Rationale and design of the OPTIMA trial. Controlled Clinical Trials, 24, 481–500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Wu, A. W., Jacobson, D. L., Frick, K. D., Clark, R., Revicki, D. A., Freedberg, K. A., et al. (2002). Validity and responsiveness of the EuroQol as a measure of health-related quality of life in people enrolled in an AIDS clinical trial. Quality of Life Research, 11, 273–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Anis, A. H., Nosyk, B., Sun, H., Guh, D. P., Bansback, N., Li, X., & Optima Team (2009). Quality of life of patients with advanced HIV/AIDS: Measuring the impact of both AIDS defining events and non-AIDS serious adverse events. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (in press).Google Scholar
- 16.Paton, N. I., Chapman, C. A., Chan, S. P., Tan, K. M., Leo, Y. S., Aboulhad, J., et al. (2002). Validation of the medical outcomes study HIV health survey as a measure of quality of life in HIV-infected patients in Singapore. International Journal of STDs and AIDS, 13, 456–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2006). Quality of life. The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes (2nd ed.). West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
- 27.Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0. https://webapps.ctep.nci.nih.gov/webobjs/ctc/webhelp/welcome_to_ctcae.htm. Accessed Jan 2009.
- 28.Sackett, D. L., Haynes, R. B., Tugwell, P. (1985). The interpretation of diagnostic data. In Clinical epidemiology: A basic science for clinical medicine (pp. 59–138). Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
- 34.Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2008). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press Inc.Google Scholar
- 37.Aiken, L. R. (1977). Note on sensitivity: A neglected psychometric concept. Perceptual and motor skills, 45, 1330.Google Scholar