Structure of the sense of coherence scale in a nationally representative sample: the Finnish Health 2000 survey
To examine the structure of the sense of coherence (SOC) scale in a general population.
This study analysed the responses of 6,217 subjects aged 30 years and over who participated in the Finnish Health 2000 survey (response rate 77.4%). Participants completed an abbreviated 12-item version of the SOC scale. Two alternative structures were tested using confirmatory factor analysis: a one-factor model, with all scale items loaded onto a single latent factor representing the SOC construct, versus a second-order factor model, with scale items loaded onto their corresponding latent factors representing the three SOC components (comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness), which are, in turn, dependent on one single higher-order SOC construct.
The one-factor model was fitted to the data after allowing the errors of comprehensibility item 5 and manageability item 6 to correlate, as was done in previous studies among Finnish adults. The comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker–Lewis index (TLI) and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) for the one-factor model were, respectively, 0.97–0.98, 0.96–0.97 and 0.05–0.09 across both sexes and three age groups. The second-order factor model had correlations between latent factors higher than 1, even after alternative model modifications, casting doubts on this more complex structure.
These data suggest that the components of comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness should be merged when measuring SOC with the 12-item SOC scale in the Finnish general population.
KeywordsSense of coherence Construct validity Confirmatory factor analysis Adults Finland
Eduardo Bernabé was supported by the Programme Alβan, the European Union Programme of High Level Scholarships for Latin America, Scholarship No. E06D1000352PE. Mika Kivimäki and Jussi Vahtera are supported by the Academy of Finland (projects 117604, 124327 and 124332).
- 1.Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. California: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
- 2.Antonovsky, A. (1984). The sense of coherence as a determinant of health. In J. D. Matarazzo, S. M. Weiss, J. A. Herd, N. E. Miller (Ed.), Behavioral health: A handbook of health enhancement and disease prevention (pp. 114–129). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- 9.Klepp, O. M., Mastekaasa, A., Sørensen, T., Sandanger, I., & Kleiner, R. (2007). Structure analysis of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence from an epidemiological mental health survey with a brief nine-item sense of coherence scale. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 16, 11–22. doi: 10.1002/mpr.197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Feldt, T., Lintula, H., Suominen, S., Koskenvuo, M., Vahtera, J., & Kivimäki, M. (2007). Structural validity and temporal stability of the 13-item sense of coherence scale: Prospective evidence from the population-based HeSSup study. Quality of Life Research, 16, 483–493. doi: 10.1007/s11136-006-9130-z.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Larsson, G., & Kallenberg, K. (1999). Dimensional analysis of sense of coherence using structural equation modelling. European Journal of Personality, 13, 51–61. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199901/02)13:1<51::AID-PER321>3.0.CO;2-P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Aromaa, A., & Koskinen, S. (Eds.). (2004). Health and functional capacity in Finland. Baseline results of the Health 2000 health examination survey. Helsinki: National Public Health Institute. http://www.terveys2000.fi/julkaisut/baseline.pdf
- 19.Savolainen, J., Suominen-Taipale, A. L., Hausen, H., Harju, P., Uutela, A., Martelin, T., et al. (2005). Sense of coherence as a determinant of the oral health-related quality of life: A national study in Finnish adults. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 113, 121–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00201.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Savolainen, J., Suominen-Taipale, A. L., Uutela, A. K., Martelin, T. P., Niskanen, M. C., & Knuuttila, M. L. (2005). Sense of coherence as a determinant of toothbrushing frequency and level of oral hygiene. Journal of Periodontology, 76, 1006–1012. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.6.1006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Savolainen, J., Suominen-Taipale, A. L., Uutela, A. U., Aromaa, A., Härkänen, T. & Knuuttila, M. (2008). Sense of coherence associates with oral and general health behaviours. Community Dental Health (in press).Google Scholar
- 22.Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus. Statistical analysis with latent variables. User’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- 23.Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- 26.Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural models (pp. 131–162). Newbury Park: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
- 30.Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2003). Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar