Health-related quality of life of day-case surgery patients: a pre/posttest survey using the EuroQoL-5D
- 151 Downloads
This paper describes and compares the perceived health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of day-case surgery patients before and after their procedures and examines some associated patient-related factors.
A pre/posttest survey design was employed to collect data from Finnish adult day-case surgery patients using participant-completed EuroQoL 5-Dimensional Classification Component Scores (EQ-5D) questionnaires given 2 weeks presurgery (n = 131) and 2 weeks postsurgery (n = 131) in 2004.
No noticeable change after minor surgery was found using the EQ-5D. Using the EQ-5D index, patients perceived their HRQoL as high before and after surgery. Almost one fifth (17%) reported no pain or discomfort before the procedure compared with 40% after it. As measured by the EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQVAS), those patients who reported chronic illness before the operation had a lower perception of their HRQoL compared with those who did not. It was also found that self-care and usual activities were more disturbed after surgery.
Although there were increases and decreases within items of the EQ-5D, overall, there was no improvement on EQ-5D scores. More research is needed to explore the sensitivity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D measure in day-case surgery patients.
KeywordsDay-case surgery patient Health-related quality of life
EuroQoL 5-Dimensional Classification Component Scores
EuroQoL visual analogue scale
health-related quality of life
- SF-12, SF-36
Short-Form Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaires
This study was funded by the South-Western Hospital District of Finland, which is gratefully acknowledged. We wish to thank Norman Rickard, M.Sc., B.Sc. (hons), R.N. for his help with the English language.
- 2.Järvelin, J. (2002). Health care systems in transition: Finland. European Observatory on Health Care Systems 4(1), 1–90.Google Scholar
- 3.Punnonen, H. (2005). Year 2004 at Finnish hospitals [Sairaaloiden vuosi 2004]. Helsinki: Suomen Kuntaliitto.Google Scholar
- 4.STAKES. (2005). Care periods with surgical operations in 2004 and trends of day-case surgery 1997–2004. [Toimenpiteelliset hoitojaksot vuonna 2004 ja päiväkirurgian trendejä vuosina 1997–2004]. Statistics. Retreived January 30, 2006, from http://www.stakes.info/2/9/2,9,1.aspfiles/pdf./Tilastotiedote2005/Tt26_05.pdf
- 5.SMG Marketing Group. (2001). Outpatient surgery doubles. OR Manager, 17, 27.Google Scholar
- 6.WHO. (1994). World Health Organization. Quality of life assessment: An annotated bibliography. WHO/MNH/PSF/94.1. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
- 7.Weale, A. E., Ackrouy, C. E., Mani, G. V., & Winson, I. G. (1998). Day-case or short-stay admission for arthroscopic knee surgery: A randomised controlled trial. Annals of the Royal College Surgeons of England, 80, 146–149.Google Scholar
- 13.Hunt, S. M., McEwen, J., & McKenna, S. (1986). Measuring health status. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
- 14.OECD. (2004). Towards high-performing health systems. OECD Health Project. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD Publications 2. Paris: Publication Services.Google Scholar
- 15.Euro-Qol Group. EQ-5D references. Retrieved September 20 2006 from the Euro-Qol Organisation web-pages http://www.euro-qol.org—Use of the EQ-5D—References.
- 31.Fedorowicz, Z., Lawrence, D., & Gutierrez, P. (2006). Day care versus in-patient surgery for age-related cataract. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005 Issue 4. No.: CD004242. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004242.pub3. Retrieved August 18.
- 32.Leino-Kilpi, H., Johansson, K., Heikkinen, K., Kaljonen, A., Virtanen, H., & Salanterä, S. (2005). Patient education and health-related quality of life. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 20, 311–320.Google Scholar
- 34.Bowling, A. (1997). Measuring health. A review of quality of life measurement scales, (2nd ed.). Bury St Edmunds: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- 35.The EuroQol Group. (1990). EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16, 199–208. (http://www.euroqol.org/).
- 41.Ohinmaa, A., & Sintonen, H. (1995). Quality of life of the Finnish population as measured by the EuroQoL. In X. Badia, M. Herdman, & A. Segura (Eds.), EuroQol (1995). Barcelona plenary meeting 3–6 October. Discussion Papers, Institut Universitari de Salut Püblica de Catalunya, pp. 161–172.Google Scholar
- 42.Ohinmaa, A., & Sintonen, H. (1998). Inconsistencies and modelling of the Finnish EuroQoL (EQ-5D) preference values. In W. Greiner, J.-M. Schulenburg, & J. Piercy (Eds.), (1999). EuroQoL plenary meeting 1–2 October. Discussion Papers, Centre of Health Economics and Health Systems Research, University of Hannover, pp. 57–74.Google Scholar
- 44.Essink-Bot, M. L., Krabbe, P. F., Bonsel, G. J., & Aaronson, N. K. (1997). An empirical comparison of four generic health status measures. The Nottingham Health Profile, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey, the COOP/WONCA charts, and the EuroQol instrument. Medical Care, 35, 522–537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Suhonen, R. (2002). Individualised care from the surgical patient’s point of view. Developing and testing a model. Annales Universitatis Turkuensis D 523. Turku: Painosalama Oy.Google Scholar
- 46.Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (1994). Principles of biomedical ethics (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 47.World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. (2002). Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 52nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October (2000). Nursing Ethics, 9, 105–109.Google Scholar
- 49.Christenson, R. (1996). Analysis of variance, design and regression. Applied statistical methods. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
- 52.Szende, A., & Williams, A. (2004). Measuring self-reported population health: An international perspective based on EQ-5D. Hungary: SpringMed Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
- 55.WHO. (2002). The European Health Report. WHO Regional Publications, European Series 97. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
- 57.BJD Strategic Plan. (2007). The Bone and joint decade, Strategic plan 2006–2010 and beyond. Retrieved April 12, 2007 from http://www.boneandjointdecade.org/default.aspx?contid=1816
- 59.Marra, C. A., Woolcott, J. C., Kopec, J. A., Shojania, K., Offer, R., Brazier, J. E., et al. (2005). A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 1571–1582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar