Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quality of life and its correlates in octogenarians. Use of the SEIQoL-DW in Wave 5 of the Aberdeen Birth Cohort 1921 Study (ABC1921)

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The direct-weighted Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life, Direct Weighting (SEIQoL-DW) is an individualised measure of QoL that has been little used in very elderly people.

Methods

We administered SEIQoL-DW during Wave 5 of the Aberdeen Birth Cohort 1921 Study (ABC1921) and sought statistical correlations with other variables in the data set. ABC1921 participants had been IQ-tested in 1932 at age 11. Since 1997, data about cognition, mental/physical function, personality, health, and socioeconomic status have been gathered in five waves of investigations.

Results

Ninety-six out of 98 individuals, mean age 82.2, completed the SEIQoL-DW. Health, family, relationships, finances and social pastimes were the commonest cues nominated, but age/gender differences existed. The mean SEIQoL-DW score (74.0) was significantly lower than in an approximately 60% sample from Wave 3, the fall being greater in men. Variables statistically associated with Wave 5 SEIQoL-DW usually reflected current rather than past status [including Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) components and depression], although there were weaker correlations with years of education, housing in childhood, conscientiousness, and IQ in 1998.

Conclusions

SEIQoL-DW proved feasible and acceptable in community-dwelling octogenarians. Recent (i.e. statelike) rather than early or long-standing (i.e. traitlike) influences appeared to have the greater effect on QoL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ABC1921:

Aberdeen Birth Cohort 1921 Study

AVLT:

Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test

BLOCK:

Block Design

CASP-19:

Control, Autonomy, Self-realisation, and Pleasure Questionnaire

DIGIT:

Digit Symbol Substitution

HADS:

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

LOT:

Life Orientation Test

MCS:

Mental Component Summary (of SF-36)

MHAQ:

Multidimensional Health Status Questionnaire

MMSE:

Mini Mental State Examination

NEO:

Neuroticism-Extroversion-Openness Personality Inventory

PCS:

Physical Component Summary (of SF-36)

QoL:

Quality of life

RAVEN:

Raven’s Progressive Matrices

SEIQoL:

Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life

SEIQoL-DW:

Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life, Direct Weighting

SF-36:

Short-Form 36 Health Survey

References

  1. Bowling A., (2005). Measuring health. A review of quality of life measurement scales (3rd ed.). Maidenhead UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Walker, A., & Hagan, C. (Eds.). (2004). Growing older: Quality of life in old age. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Walker, A. (Ed.). (2005). Understanding quality of life in old age. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kempen, G. I. J. M., Jelicic, M., & Ormel, J. (1997). Personality, chronic medical morbidity, and health-related Quality of Life among older persons. Health Psychology, 16, 539–546.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bain, G. H., Lemmon, H., Teunisse, S., Starr, J. M., Fox, H. C., Deary, I. J., & Whalley, L. J. (2003). Quality of life in healthy old age: Relationships with childhood IQ, minor psychological symptoms and optimism. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 38, 632–636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wiggins, R. D., Higgs, P. F. D., Hyde, M., & Blane, D. B. (2004). Quality of life in the third age: Key predictors of the CASP-19 measure. Ageing and Society, 24, 693–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blane, D., Higgs, P., Hyde, M., & Wiggins, R. D. (2004). Life course influences on quality of life in early old age. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 2171–2179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Puts, M. T. E., Shekary, N., Widdershoven, G., Heldens, J., Lips, P., & Deeg, D. J. H. (2007). What does quality of life mean to older frail and non-frail community-dwelling adults in the Netherlands? Quality of Life Research, 16, 263–277.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tannenbaum, C., Ahmed, S., & Mayo, N. (2007). What drives older women’s perceptions of health-related quality of life? Quality of Life Research, 16, 593–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Butler, J., & Ciarrochi, J. (2007). Psychological acceptance and quality of life in the elderly. Quality of Life Research, 16, 607–615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Low, G., & Molzahn, A. E. (2007). Predictors of quality of life in old age: A cross-validation study. Research in Nursing and Health, 30, 141–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Whalley, L. J., Starr, J. M., Athawes, R., Hunter, D., Pattie, A., & Deary, I. J. (2000). Childhood mental ability and dementia. Neurology, 55, 1455–1459.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Deary, I. J., Whalley, L. J., Lemmon, H., Crawford, J. R., & Starr, J. M. (2000). The stability of individual differences in mental ability from childhood to old age: Follow-up of the 1932 Scottish Mental Survey. Intelligence, 28, 49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Starr, J. M., Deary, I. J., Lemmon, H., & Whalley, L. J. (2000). Mental ability age 11 years and health status age 77 years. Age and Ageing, 29, 523–528.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Whalley, L. J., & Deary, I. J. (2001). Longitudinal cohort study of childhood IQ and survival up to age 76. BMJ, 322, 819–822.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Boyle, C. A. (1997). Measuring the quality of later life. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 352, 1871–1879.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Boyle, C. A., McGee, H. M., Hickey, A., Joyce, C. R. B., Browne, J., O’Malley, K., & Hiltbrunner, B. (1993). The schedule for the evaluation of individual quality of life (SEIQoL): Administration manual. Dublin: Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Browne, J. P., O’Boyle, C. A., McGee, H. M., Joyce, C. R. B., McDonald, N. J., O’Malley, K., & Hiltbrunner, B. (1994). Individual quality of life in the healthy elderly. Quality of Life Research, 3, 235–233.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Joyce, C. R. B., Hickey, A., McGee, H. M., & O’Boyle, C. A. (2003). A theory-based method for the evaluation of quality of life: The SEIQoL. Quality of Life Research, 12, 275–280.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hickey, A. M., Bury, G., O’Boyle, C. A., Bradley, F., O’Kelly, F. D., & Shannon, W. (1996). A new short form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): Application in a cohort of individuals with HIV/AIDS. BMJ, 313, 29–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Browne, J. P., O’Boyle, C. A., McGee, H. M., McDonald, N. J., & Joyce, C. R. B. (1997). Development of a direct weighting procedure for quality of life domains. Quality of Life Research, 6, 301–309.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mountain, L. A., Campbell, S. E., Seymour, D. G., Primrose, W. R., & Whyte, M. I. (2004). Assessment of individual quality of life using the SEIQoL-DW in older medical patients. QJM, 97, 519–524.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. de Leval, N. (1999). Quality of life and depression: Symmetry concepts. Quality of Life Research, 8, 283–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2000). Quality of life. Assessment, analysis and interpretation. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lhussier, M., Watson, B., Reed, J., & Clarke, C. L. (2005). The SEIQoL and functional status: How do they relate? Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 19, 403–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (2000). SF-36 Health survey. Manual and interpretation guide, Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.

  27. Ware, J. E., & Kosinski, M. (2001). SF-36 Physical and mental health summary scales: A manual for users of version 1. (2nd ed.). Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Inc, pp. 243, 252, 270.

  29. Deary, I. J., Whiteman, M. C., Starr, J. M., Whalley, L. J., & Fox, H. C. (2004). The impact of childhood intelligence on later life: Following up the Scottish Mental Surveys of 1932 and 1947. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 130–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery and self-esteem): A re-evaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., & Loring, D. W. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment. (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361–370.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Guildford, J. P., Christensen, P. R., Merrifield, P. R., & Wilson, R. C. (1978). Alternate uses: Manual of instructions and interpretation. Orange, CA: Sheridan Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wettergren, L., Bjorkholm, M., & Langius-Eklof, A. (2005). Validation of an extended version of the SEIQoL-DW in a cohort of Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. Quality of Life Research, 14, 2329–2333.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Trauer, T., & Mackinnon, A. (2001). Why are we weighting? The role of importance ratings in quality of life measurement. Quality of Life Research, 10, 579–585.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Russell, L. B., & Hubley, A. M. (2005). Importance ratings and weighting: old concerns and new perspectives. International Journal of Testing, 5, 105–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Russell, L. B., Hubley, A. M., Palepu, A., & Zumbo, B. D. (2006). Does weighting capture what’s important? Revisiting subjective importance weighting with a quality of life measure. Social Indicators Research, 75, 141–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hsieh, C. M. (2003). Counting importance: The case of life satisfaction and relative domain importance. Social Indicators Research, 61, 227–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hsieh, C. M. (2004). To weight or not to weight: The role of domain importance in quality of life measurement. Social Indicators Research, 68, 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gabriel, Z., & Bowling, A. (2004). Quality of life from the perspectives of older people. Ageing and Society, 24, 675–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sprangers, M. A. G., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science & Medicine, 48, 1507–1515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Schwartz, C. E., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (1999). Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research. Social Science & Medicine, 48, 1531–1548.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Murrell, R. C., Kenealy, P. M., Beaumont, J. G., & Lintern, T. C. (1999). Assessing quality of life in persons with severe neurological disability associated with multiple sclerosis: The psychometric evaluation of two quality of life measures. British Journal of Health Psychology, 4, 349–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Smith, H. J., Taylor, R., & Mitchell, A. (2000). A comparison of four quality of life instruments in cardiac patients: SF-36, QLI, QLMI, and SEIQoL. Heart, 84, 390–394.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Lintern, T. C., Beaumont, J. G., Kenealy, P. M., & Murrell, R. C. (2001). Quality of life (QoL) in severely disabled multiple sclerosis patients: Comparison of three QoL measures using multidimensional scaling. Quality of Life Research, 10, 371–378.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Neudert, C., Wasner, M., & Borasio, G. D. (2001). Patients’ assessment of quality of life instruments: A randomised study of SIP, SF-36 and SEIQoL-DW in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 191, 103–109.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Neudert, C., Wasner, M., & Borasio, G. D. (2004). Individual quality of life is not correlated with health-related quality of life or physical function in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 7, 551–557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Moore, M., Hofer, S., McGee, H., Ring, L. (2005). Can the concepts of depression and quality of life be integrated using a time perspective? Health and quality of life outcomes, 3(1), 1 doi:10.1186/147707525-3-1.

  50. Efklides, A., Kalaitzidou, M., & Chankin, G. (2003). Subjective quality of life in old age in Greece. The effect of demographic factors, emotional state, and adaptation to aging. European Psychologist, 8, 178–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2006). Age changes in personality and their origins; comment on Roberts, Walton and Viechtbauer. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 29–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Pedroso de Lima, M., Simoes, A., Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A., Marusic, I., Bratko, D., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Chae, J. H., & Piedmont, R. L. (1999). Age differences in personality across the adult life span: Parallels in five cultures. Developmental Psychology, 35, 466–477.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Wrosch, C., & Scheier, M. F. (2003). Personality and quality of life: The importance of optimism and goal adjustment. Quality of Life Research, 12(Suppl 1), 59–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Siegler, I. C., & Brummett, B. H. (2000). Associations among NEO personality assessments and well-being at midlife: Facet-level analyses. Psychology and Aging, 15, 710–714.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Hagberg, M., Hagberg, B., & Saveman, B. -I. (2002). The significance of personality factors for various dimensions of life quality among older people. Aging & Mental Health, 6, 178–185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Hilleras, P. K., Jorm, A. F., Herlitz, A., & Winblad, B. (2001). Life satisfaction among the very old: A survey on a cognitively intact sample aged 90 years or above. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 52, 71–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Giltay, E. J., Geleijnse, J. M., Zitman, F. G., Hoekstra, T., & Schouten, E. G. (2004). Dispositional optimism and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a prospective cohort of elderly Dutch men and women. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 1126–1135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Staff, R. T., Murray, A. D., Deary, I. J., & Whalley, L. J. (2004). What provides cerebral reserve? Brain, 127, 1191–1199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Hyde, M., Wiggins, R. D., Higgs, P. F. D., & Blane, D. B. (2003). A measure of quality of life in early old age: The theory, development and properties of a needs satisfaction model (CASP-19). Aging & Mental Health, 7, 186–194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Walker, A. (2004). The ESRC growing older research programme, 1999–2004. Ageing and Society, 24, 657–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Higgs, P., Hyde, M., Wiggins, R., & Blane D. (2003). Researching quality of life in early old age: The importance of the sociological dimension. Social Policy & Administration, 37, 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Blane, D., Berney, L., Davey Smith, G., Gunnell, D. J., & Holland, P. (1999). Reconstructing the life course: Health during old age in a follow-up study based on the Boyd Orr cohort. Public Health, 113, 117–124.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Netuveli, G., Wiggins, R. D., Hildon, Z., Montgomery, S. M., & Blane, D. (2005). Functional limitation in long standing illness and quality of life: Evidence from a national survey. BMJ, 331, 1382–1383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Netuveli, G., Wiggins, R. D., Hildon, Z., Montgomery, S. M., & Blane, D. (2006). Quality of life at older ages: Evidence from the english longitudinal study of aging (Wave 1). Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 357–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. McGowan, M., Pussayapibul, N., Wiggins, R. (2005). Quality of life strategy—A partnership approach to evaluation http://www.laria.gov.uk/content/articles/2005_conference_pdf/pdfs/mcgowanpussayapibulwiggins.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2007.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Dr. Saskia Teunisse for providing training and expertise in regard to the SEIQoL-DW. Funding for Wave 5 data collection of the ABC1921 was provided by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Executive Health Department. Research support for earlier Waves of the ABC1921 and of individual researchers was provided by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, the Wellcome Trust and the Alzheimer Research Trust.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Gwyn Seymour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seymour, D.G., Starr, J.M., Fox, H.C. et al. Quality of life and its correlates in octogenarians. Use of the SEIQoL-DW in Wave 5 of the Aberdeen Birth Cohort 1921 Study (ABC1921). Qual Life Res 17, 11–20 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9291-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9291-4

Keywords

Navigation