Quality of Life Research

, Volume 16, Issue 10, pp 1635–1645 | Cite as

Spontaneous reports of most distressing concerns in patients with inoperable lung cancer: at present, in retrospect and in comparison with EORTC-QLQ-C30+LC13

  • Eva Broberger
  • Carol Tishelman
  • Louise von Essen
  • Eva Doukkali
  • Mirjam A. G. Sprangers


Patients with lung cancer experience considerable distress. Therefore, accurate methods for assessing distress and quality of life over time may play a key role for managing and evaluating palliative care. Alternatives to commonly used standardized questionnaires are individual measures. This study prospectively and retrospectively explored the concerns that 46 patients with inoperable lung cancer spontaneously reported as causing most distress close to diagnosis and 6 months later. Changes in content individually generated through a structured inductive freelisting were compared with EORTC-QLQ-C30+LC13 ratings. The results showed that patients perceived a wide variety of concerns as most distressing and that their concerns changed over time. Between 56 and 62% of these concerns were assessed by items included in the EORTC-QLQ-C30+LC13 questionnaires. Furthermore, patients’ reports of most distress from fatigue, pain and dyspnea were not always reflected in intensity ratings of comparable EORTC-QLQ-C30+LC13 items. These results indicate that items included in standardized measures are not always adequate to assess patients’ concerns, priorities and changes over time. In addition to standardized questionnaires, individualized measures may be useful in the clinical palliative setting for providing detailed information about the individual’s problems and prioritizations.


Change Distress Freelisting Lung cancer 



Health Care System


Lung cancer


Quality of life



The authors thank the following sources for financial support: The Swedish Cancer Society, The Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, The Swedish Foundation for Health Care Sciences and Allergy Research, The Research Board for Health Caring Sciences at Karolinska Institutet, and the Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society at Karolinska Institutet. We also thank Coop Sweden for their support. We would like to express our sincere thanks to Kristina Bertilsson and the other research team colleagues Helena Leveälahti, Ann Rudman and Joakim Öhlén for helpful input and discussions about categorization.


  1. 1.
    Beckles, M. A., Spiro, S. G., Colice, G. L., & Rudd, R. M. (2003). Initial evaluation of the patient with lung cancer: symptoms, signs, laboratory tests, and paraneoplastic syndromes. Chest, 123(1 Suppl), 97S–104S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Corner, J., Hopkinson, J., Fitzsimmons, D., Barclay, S., & Muers, M. (2005). Is late diagnosis of lung cancer inevitable? Interview study of patients’ recollections of symptoms before diagnosis. Thorax, 60(4), 314–319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koyi, H., Hillerdal, G., & Branden, E. (2002). Patient’s and doctors’ delays in the diagnosis of chest tumors. Lung Cancer, 35(1), 53–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tishelman, C., Degner, L. F., Rudman, A., Bertilsson, K., Bond, R., Broberger, E., Doukkali, E., & Levealahti, H. (2005). Symptoms in patients with lung carcinoma: Distinguishing distress from intensity. Cancer, 104(9), 2013–2021.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tishelman, C., Petersson, L.-M., Degner, L., & Sprangers, M. (in press). Symptom prevalence, intensity and association with distress in patients with inoperable lung cancer in relation to time of death. Journal of Clinical Oncology.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Distress Management [www.nccn.org].Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Broberger, E., Tishelman, C., & von Essen, L. (2005). Discrepancies and similarities in how patients with lung cancer and their professional and family caregivers assess symptom occurrence and symptom distress. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 29(6), 572–583.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tishelman, C., Degner, L. F., & Mueller, B. (2000). Measuring symptom distress in patients with lung cancer. A pilot study of experienced intensity and importance of symptoms. Cancer Nursing, 23(2), 82–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McCorkle, R., & Young, K. (1978). Development of a symptom distress scale. Cancer Nursing, 1(5), 373–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., de Haes, J. C. et al. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R. A., Carter, W. B., & Gilson, B. S. (1981). The sickness impact profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure. Medical Care, 19(8), 787–805.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sprangers, M. A., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. Social Science & Medicine, 48(11), 1507–1515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ahmed, S., Mayo, N. E., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Hanley, J. A., & Cohen, S. R. (2005). Using the Patient Generated Index to evaluate response shift post-stroke. Qual Life Research, 14(10), 2247–2257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Boyle, C., McGee, H., & Browne, J. (2000). Measuring response shift using the schedule for evaluation of individual quality of life. In Schwartz, C. E., &Sprangers, M. A. (Eds.), Adaptation to changing health: Response shift in quality of life research (pp. 123–136). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bernard, H. R. (2006). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). Lanham: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Christian, P., Bentley, M. E., Pradhan, R., & West, K. P., Jr. (1998). An ethnographic study of night blindness “ratauni” among women in the Terai of Nepal. Social Science & Medicine, 46(7), 879–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Strauss, R. P., Sengupta, S., Kegeles, S., McLellan, E., Metzger, D., Eyre, S., Khanani, F., Emrick, C. B., & MacQueen, K. M. (2001). Willingness to volunteer in future preventive HIV vaccine trials: issues and perspectives from three, U.S. communities. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 26(1), 63–71.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bergman, B., Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Kaasa, S., & Sullivan, M. (1994). The EORTC QLQ-LC13: a modular supplement to the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) for use in lung cancer clinical trials. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life. European Journal of Cancer, 30A(5), 635–642.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Montazeri, A., Gillis, C. R., & McEwen, J. (1998). Quality of life in patients with lung cancer: a review of literature from 1970 to 1995. Chest, 113(2), 467–481.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Michelson, H., Bolund, C., Nilsson, B., & Brandberg, Y. (2000). Health-related quality of life measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30—reference values from a large sample of Swedish population. Acta Oncology, 39(4), 477–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McCorkle, R., & Quint-Benoliel, J. (1983). Symptom distress, current concerns and mood disturbance after diagnosis of life-threatening disease. Social Science & Medicine, 17(7), 431–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Scaling back goals and recalibration of the affect system are processes in normal adaptive self-regulation: understanding ‘response shift’ phenomena. Soc Sci Med, 50(12), 1715–1722.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sharpe, L., & Curran, L. (2006). Understanding the process of adjustment to illness. Soc Sci Med, 62(5), 1153–1166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Higginson, I., Priest, P., & McCarthy, M. (1994). Are bereaved family members a valid proxy for a patient’s assessment of dying? Soc Sci Med, 38(4), 553–557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sharpe, L., Butow, P., Smith, C., McConnell, D., & Clarke, S. (2005). Changes in quality of life in patients with advanced cancer: evidence of response shift and response restriction. Journal of psychosomatic research, 58(6), 497–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stromgren, A. S., Sjogren, P., Goldschmidt, D., Petersen, M. A., Pedersen, L., & Groenvold, M. (2005). Symptom priority and course of symptomatology in specialized palliative care. Journal of pain and symptom management, 31(3), 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wagner, J. A. (2005). Response shift and glycemic control in children with diabetes. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 3(1), 38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bradburn, N. M., Rips, L. J., & Shevell, S. K. (1987). Answering autobiographical questions: The impact of memory and inference on surveys. Science, 236(4798), 157–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Henry, B., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Langley, J., & Silva, P. A. (1994). On the “Rembrance of Things Past”: A longitudinal evaluation of the retrospective method. Psychological Assessment, 6(2), 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Herdman, M. (2000). The measurement of health related quality of life. Medicina Clinica (Barc), 114(Suppl 3), 22–25.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Broberger
    • 1
  • Carol Tishelman
    • 2
    • 3
  • Louise von Essen
    • 5
  • Eva Doukkali
    • 1
  • Mirjam A. G. Sprangers
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of NursingKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Research and Development UnitStockholm Sjukhem FoundationStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management CentreKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
  4. 4.Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical CenterUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Psychosocial oncologyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations