Translation, cultural adaptation, cross-validation of the Turkish diabetes quality-of-life (DQOL) measure
- 414 Downloads
Objective The aim of this study was to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the diabetes quality of life (DQOL) questionnaire for use with patients with diabetes. Methods Turkish version of the generic quality of life (QoL) scale 15D and DQOL, socio-demographics and clinical parameter characteristics were administered to 150 patients with type 2 diabetes. Study participants were randomly sampled from the Endocrinology and Diabetes Outpatient Department of Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Education and Research Hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. Results The Cronbach alpha coefficient of the overall DQOL scale was 0.89; the Cronbach alpha coefficient ranged from 0.80 to 0.94 for subscales. Distress, discomfort and its symptoms, depression, mobility, usual activities, and vitality on the 15 D scale had statistically significant correlations with social/vocational worry and diabetes-related worry on the DQOL scale indicating good convergent validity. Factor analysis identified four subscales: satisfaction”, impact”, “diabetes-related worry”, and “social/vocational worry”. Conclusion Statistical analyses showed that the Turkish version of the DQOL is a valid and reliable instrument to measure disease related QoL in patients with diabetes. It is a simple and quick screening tool with about 15 ± 5.8 min administration time for measuring QoL in this population.
KeywordsDiabetes Quality of life Diabetes quality of life Validation
Diabetes quality of life
Quality of life
Health related quality of life
Diabetes control and complications trial
Impaired glucose tolerance
This study would not have been possible without the support of all our patients and their families. The authors gratefully acknowledge the careful review, insightful comments, and suggestions of the reviewer(s) on the earlier version of this manuscript.
- 1.Wild, S., Roglic, G., Green, A., Sicree, A., & King, H. (2004). Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care, 27, 1047–1053.Google Scholar
- 15.Sintonen, H., & Pekurinen, M. (1993). A fifteen dimensional measure of health related quality of life (15D) and its applications. In S. R. Walker & R. M. Rosser (Eds.), Quality of life assessment. Key issues in the 1990s (pp. 185–195). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- 16.Yfantopoulos, J. (2001). Validation and measurement of quality of life in Greece using EQ-15D. Archives of Hellenic Medicine, 18, 279–287.Google Scholar
- 17.Sintonen, H. (1994). The 15D measure of health related quality of life. I. Reliability, validity and sensitivity of its health state descriptive system. Working Paper 42, National Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Melbourne.Google Scholar
- 20.Hoyle, R. H., Harris, M. J., & Judd, C. M. (2002). Research methods in social relations (7th edn.). Thomson Learning Inc.Google Scholar