Recovered? Association between self-perceived recovery and the SF-36 after minor musculoskeletal injuries
- 86 Downloads
Recovery after minor musculoskeletal injuries is often disproportionately protracted. Our aim was to relate Short Form-36 (SF-36), to self-perceived recovery assessed with the question” Do you feel recovered”. We hypothesized that restitution of physical factors would be reported at least as often as improvement of symptoms or impairments and that social and mental factors would dominate over physical as determinants for recovery. We followed 318 patients with minor traffic-related injuries for up to 6 months.
For all SF-36 subscores more than 60% of the recovered patients had returned to their pre-injury levels. The subscores with the highest proportions (> 80%) were all mainly reflecting disability. For no subscore, however, was the proportion 100%. Normalizations in the SF-36 subscores for “Bodily Pain” (BP) (Odds Ratio, OR = 7.2), “Role limitations due to physical function” (OR = 5.3) were associated with self-perceived recovery.
Abolition of pain appears to be paramount for the self-perceived recovery, but it is neither a sufficient nor a necessary prerequisite. Contrary to our expectation, physical aspects of functional health status were more strongly associated with recovery than were emotional or social aspects.
KeywordsFunctional health status Injury Musculoskeletal Recovery Traffic
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This study was supported by grants from the Swedish National Road Administration and AFA Research Foundation.
The authors are grateful to: Agnes Ek, RN, and Maja Holmberg, RN, who recruited the patients; Tina Levander, RN, who followed up the patients; and Anne Skoog, MD for her help with the study.
- 19.Sullivan, JK. SF-36 Hälsoenkät (Swedish manual and interpretation guide). Gothenburg: Health and care research unit, medical faculty, Sahlgrenska hospital, 1994.Google Scholar
- 20.Beaton DE, Schemitsch E. Measures of health-related quality of life and physical function. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 413: 90–105.Google Scholar
- 21.Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley, 2000. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics, ISSN 99-2228856-7.)Google Scholar