Abstract
Background: Quality of life (QoL) in valvular surgery may differ according to the underlying pathology and surgical technique used. Method: 82 adults undergoing their first elective surgery for valve repair (VP; n=9) or valve replacement (VR) with a mechanical valve (MVR; n=57) or bioprosthesis (BVR; n=16) were assessed before surgery and three months afterwards. Dependent variables: Δ scores (postoperative – preoperative) on QoL measures (Quality of Life Systemic Inventory (QLSI) and SF-36). Analyses: Paired t tests and ANCOVAs with age and preoperative QoL scores as covariates. Results: QoL improves after surgery according to most subscales. According to group comparisons, patients with an MVR improve more than those with a BVR on the mental health subscale. In physical roles, patients with an MVR improve while those with a BVR deteriorate. In emotional roles, patients with a VR improve while those with a VP deteriorate. However, they are similar on all other subscales. Women improve more than men on leisure, affectivity and social functioning while the opposite holds true for mental health. Conclusion: QoL improves after surgery. However, significant differences between groups are small because of a lack of statistical power.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ANCOVA:
-
analysis of covariance
- BVR:
-
bioprosthesis
- CABG:
-
coronary artery bypass graft
- MVR:
-
mechanical valve replacement
- QLSI:
-
Quality of Life Systemic Inventory
- QoL:
-
quality of life
- SF-36:
-
Medical Outcome Study Short-Form 36
- VP:
-
valve repair
- VR:
-
valve replacement
References
DF Pupello et al. (2001) ArticleTitleLong-term results of the bioprosthesis in elderly patients: Impact on quality of life. Ann Thorac Surg 71 244–248
TM Sundt et al. (2000) ArticleTitleQuality of life after aortic valve replacement at the age of over 80 years Circulation 102 (Suppl. III) III-70–III-74
H Yamaguchi et al. (2000) ArticleTitleQuality of life in patients over 70 years of age after heart valve replacement. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 6 167–172
CJ Mullany (2000) ArticleTitleAortic valve surgery in the elderly [Review]. Cardiol Rev 6 333–339
S Aoyagi et al. (1998) ArticleTitleValve surgery in elderly patients 70 years or older: Early and late results. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 4 18–27
AC Ralph-Edwards et al. (1999) ArticleTitleValve surgery in octogenarians. Can J Cardiol 15 1113–1119
PSU Myken et al. (1995) ArticleTitleMechanical versus biological valve prosthesis: A ten-year comparison regarding function and quality of life. Ann Thorac Surg 60 S447–S452
NC Poirier et al. (1998) ArticleTitle15-years experience with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 66 (Suppl.) S57–S61
H Corbineau et al. (2001) ArticleTitleStructural durability in Carpentier-Edwards Standard bioprosthesis in the mitral position: A 20-year experience. J Heart Valve Dis 10 443–448
H Corbineau et al. (2001) ArticleTitleCarpentier-Edwards supraannular procine bioprosthesis in aortic position: 16-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 71 S228–S231
MJ Dalrymple-Hay et al. (2000) ArticleTitleA single-center experience with 1, 378 CarboMedics mechanical valve implants. Ann Thorac Surg 69 457–463
Y Logeais et al. (1999) ArticleTitleAortic Carpentier-Edwards supraannular procine bioprosthesis: A 12-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 68 421–425
PH Neville et al. (1998) ArticleTitleCarpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic or mitral position: A 12-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 66 S143–S147
WR Jamieson et al. (1998) ArticleTitleCarpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: A 21-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 66 S40–S43
A Hurle et al. (1998) ArticleTitleClinical experience with the Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine bioprosthesis implanted in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis 7 331–335
JF Nistal et al. (1996) ArticleTitleClinical experience with the CarboMedics valve: Early results with a new bileaflet mechanical prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112 59–68
LC Pelletier et al. (1995) ArticleTitleThe Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: Clinical experience with 600 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 60 S297–S302
MA Radermecker (1998) ArticleTitleSurgical repair for mitral valve disease. Acta Chir Belg 98 142–147
MJ Antunes (1992) ArticleTitleMitral valve repair into the 1990s. European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 6 S13–S16
LH Cohn (1991) ArticleTitleMitral valve surgery: Replacement vs reconstruction. Hosp Pract 26 49–58
MA Radermecker (2000) ArticleTitleFondements et indications de la chirurgie réparatrice dans les valvulopathies mitrales. Bulletin et Mémoires de l’Academie Royale de Médecine de Belgique 155 163–169
R Espada et al. (1998) ArticleTitleNew developments in mitral valve repair. Curr Opin Cardiol 13 80–84
CA O’Boyle (1992) ArticleTitleAssessment of quality of life in surgery. Br J Surg 79 395–398
H Troidl et al. (1987) ArticleTitleQuality of life: An important endpoint both in surgical practice and research. J Chronic Dis 40 523–528
IRA Goldsmith et al. (2001) ArticleTitleA prospective study of changes in patients’ quality of life after aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis 10 346–353
SCA Fraser (1993) ArticleTitleQuality-of-life measurement in surgical practice [Review]. Br J Surg 80 163–169 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC1cvot1M%3D Occurrence Handle8443640
E Neugebauer et al. (1991) ArticleTitleQuality-of-life assessment in surgery: Results of the Meran Consensus Development Conference. Theor Surg 6 123–137
DR Packa (1989) ArticleTitleQuality of life of cardiac patients: A review. J Cardiovasc Nurs 3 1–11
P Myken et al. (1995) ArticleTitleSimilar quality of life after heart valve replacement with mechanical or bioprosthetic valves. J Heart Valve Dis 4 339–345
M Perchinsky et al. (1998) ArticleTitleQuality of life in patients with bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses: Evaluation of cohorts of patients aged 51–65 years at implantation Circulation 98 II81–II-87
IR Goldsmith et al. (2001) ArticleTitleA prospective study of changes in the quality of life of patients following mitral valve repair and replacement. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg 20 949–955
K Miller et al. (1999) ArticleTitleCoronary artery bypass surgery in women and men: Preoperative profile and postoperative outcomes. Medsurg Nurs 8 167–172
CG Koch et al. (1996) ArticleTitleThe risk of coronary artery surgery in women: A matched comparison using preoperative severity of illness scoring. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 10 839–843
SH Rankin (1990) ArticleTitleDifferences in recovery from cardiac surgery: A profile of male and female patients. Heart Lung 19 481–485
KM King et al. (1998) ArticleTitleShort term recovery from cardiac surgery in women: Suggestions for practice. Can J Cardiol 14 1367–1371
KM King (2000) ArticleTitleGender and short-term recovery from cardiac surgery. Nurs Res 49 29–36
SE Sheifer et al. (2000) ArticleTitleRace and sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 139 848–857
SH Ranking (1989) ArticleTitleWomen recovering from cardiac surgery [Abstract] Circulation 80 II-391
CD Jenkins et al. (1983) ArticleTitleCoronary artery bypass surgery: Physical, psychological, social, and economic outcomes six months later. JAMA 250 782–788
D Naber et al. (1985) ArticleTitleNeuroendocrine and psychological variables relating to post-operative psychosis after open-heart surgery. Psychoneuroendocrinology 10 315–324
RC Phillips et al. (1992) ArticleTitleOutcomes management in heart valve replacement surgery: Early experience. J Heart Valve Dis 1 42–50 Occurrence Handle1341222
A Nötzold et al. (2001) ArticleTitleQuality of life in aortic valve replacement: Pulmonary autografts versus mechanical prostheses. J Am Coll Cardiol 37 1963–1966
L Campeau (1976) ArticleTitleGrading of angina pectoris [letter to the editor]. Circulation 54 522–523
G Dupuis et al. (2001) ArticleTitleQuality of Life Systemic Inventory (QLSI): Sensitivity to change and psychometric characteristics [abstract] Ann Behav Med 23 S160
RL Duquette et al. (1994) ArticleTitleA new approach for quality of life assessment in cardiac patients: Rationale and validation of the Quality of Life Systemic Inventory (QLSI). Can J Cardiol 10 106–112
G Dupuis et al. (2000) ArticleTitleMeasurement of change in quality of life among valvular patients and sensitivity of two instruments: Quality of Life Systemic Inventory and Short-Form-36 [abstract] Circulation 102 II-655
S Wood-Dauphinee et al. (1997) ArticleTitleReadying a US measure of health status, the SF-36, for use in Canada. Clinical Investigation in Medicine 20 224–238
JL Fleis (1986) Analysis of covariance and the study of change JL Fleis (Eds) The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. John Wiley & Sons New York 195
SM Czajkowski et al. (1997) ArticleTitleComparison of preoperative characteristics of men and women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (the Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft [CABG] Biobehavioral Study). Am J Cardiol 79 1017–1024
S Chocron et al. (1996) ArticleTitleProspective study of quality of life before and after open heart operations. Ann Thorac Surg 61 153–157
CD Jenkins et al. (1983) ArticleTitlePhysical, psychological, social, and economic outcomes after cardiac valve surgery. Arch Intern Med 143 2107–2113
G Magni et al. (1987) ArticleTitlePsychosocial outcome one year after heart surgery: A prospective study. Arch Intern Med 147 473–477
JK Ross et al. (1978) ArticleTitleWessex cardiac surgery follow-up survey: The quality of life after operation. Thorax 33 3–9
KL Yun et al. (1999) ArticleTitleTime related quality of life after elective cardiac operation. Ann Thorac Surg 68 1314–1320
A Gehlot et al. (1996) ArticleTitleAortic valve replacement in patients aged eighty years and older: Early and long-term results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 111 1026–1036
I Kirchberger et al. (1997) ArticleTitleQuality of life after heart valve replacement-a comparison of patients with biological versus mechanical heart valves [abstract] Qual Life Res 6 670
M Chesney et al. (1998) Social support and heart disease in women: Implications for intervention K Orth-Gomér M Chesney NK Wenger (Eds) Women, Stress and Heart Disease Laurence Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ
S Czajkowski (1998) Psychosocial aspects of women’s recovery from heart disease K Orth-Gomér M Chesney NK Wenger (Eds) Women, Stress and Heart Disease Laurence Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taillefer, MC., Dupuis, G., Hardy, JF. et al. Quality of life before and after heart valve surgery is influenced by gender and type of valve. Qual Life Res 14, 769–778 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-1667-0
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-1667-0