Abstract
The existing theories about how social networks affect creativity mostly focus on a certain stage in the organizational life of an idea, for instance, ideas generation, commercialization of ideas, and a previous assumption refers that multiple attributes of social networks of creative team are static. It is not possible to resolve such a realistic and important issue that how dynamic evolution of social networks affects the creative process at the fuzzy front-end of complex new product development (CNPD) of research and development (R&D) teams. This paper studies six R&D teams of CNPD from three new high-tech enterprises, in terms of network transaction content-heterogeneity/homogeneity of task knowledge, network relationship strength—weak tie/strong tie, and network structure—core–periphery as three major dimensions of social networks. It analyzes their dynamic evolution in the creative process and its influence on three sub-processes named idea generation, idea screening, and idea development. We find that in R&D teams network transaction content-heterogeneity of task knowledge, weak-tie network relationship, and discrete network structure are conducive to idea generation; homogeneity of task knowledge, strong-tie network relationship, and centralized network structure are good for idea screening; homogeneity of task knowledge in the network is maintained while new knowledge is obtained actively from the outside; internal network relationship is dominated by strong tie while weak tie is connected with the outside; both diffused and balanced network structures are beneficial to idea development.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amabile, T.M.: A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In: Staw, B.M., Cummings, L.L. (eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 10, pp. 123–167. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT (1988)
Amabile, T.M.: Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Harvard Business School, Boston (1996)
Anand, N., Gardner, H.K., Morris, T.: Knowledge-based innovation: emergence and embedding of new practice areas in management consulting firms. Acad. Manag. J. 50(2), 406–428 (2007)
Ancona, D.G., Caldwell, D.F.: Demography and design: predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. 3(3), 321–341 (1992)
Andrews, J., Smith, D.C.: In search of the marketing imagination: factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for mature products. J. Mark. Res. 33(2), 174–187 (1996)
Barczak, G., Griffin, A., Kahn, K.B.: Perspective: trends and drivers of success in NPD practices: results of the 2003 PDMA best practices study. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 26(1), 3–23 (2009)
Basadur, M., Graen, G.B., Green, S.G.: Training in creative problem solving: effects on ideation and problem finding and solving in an industrial research organization. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 30(1), 41–70 (1982)
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G.: Models of core/periphery structures. Soc. Netw. 21(4), 375–395 (2000)
Braha, D., Bar-Yam, Y.: The statistical mechanics of complex product development: empirical and analytical results. Manag. Sci. 53(7), 1127–1145 (2007)
Cattani, G., Ferriani, S.: A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organ. Sci. 19(6), 824–844 (2008)
Chen, M.H., Chang, Y.C., Hung, S.C.: Social capital and creativity in R&D project teams. R&d Manag. 38(1), 21–34 (2008)
Cooper, R.G., Kleinschmidt, E.J.: Major new products: what distinguishes the winners in the chemical industry? J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 10(2), 90–111 (1993)
Darr, E.D., Kurtzberg, T.R.: 2000 An investigation of partner similarity dimensions on knowledge transfer. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 82 (1), 28–44 (2000)
Diehl, M., Stroebe, W.: Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: toward the solution of a riddle. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 53(3), 497 (1987)
Drazin, R., Glynn, M.A., Kazanjian, R.K.: Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: a sensemaking perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 24(2), 286–307 (1999)
Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14(4), 532–550 (1989)
Eisenhardt, K.M.: Better stories and better constructs: the case for rigor and comparative logic. Acad. Manag. Rev. 16(3), 620–627 (1991)
Eisenhardt, K.M., Bourgeois, L.J.: Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: toward a midrange theory. Acad. Manag. J. 31(4), 737–770 (1988)
Elam, J.J., Mead, M.: Can software influence creativity? Inf. Syst. Res. 1(1), 1–22 (1990)
Elsbach, K.D., Kramer, R.M.: Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments. Acad. Manag. J. 46(3), 283–301 (2003)
Friedmann, J.: Regional Development Policy: A Case Study of Venezuela. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1966)
Garfield, M.J., Taylor, N.J., Dennis, A.R., Satzinger, J.W.: Research report: modifying paradigms—individual differences, creativity techniques, and exposure to ideas in group idea generation. Inf. Syst. Res. 12(3), 322–333 (2001)
Gilsing, V., Nooteboom, B.: Density and strength of ties in innovation networks: an analysis of multimedia and biotechnology. Eur. Manag. Rev. 2(3), 179–197 (2005)
Glynn, M.A.: Innovative genius: a framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. Acad. Manag. Rev. 21(4), 1081–1111 (1996)
Golden, B.R.: Research notes. The past is the past—or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Acad. Manag. J. 35(4), 848–860 (1992)
Granovetter, M.S.: The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78, 1360–1380 (1973)
Granovetter, M.: The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociol. Theory 1(1), 201–233 (1983)
Hansen, M.T., Mors, M.L., Løvås, B.: Knowledge sharing in organizations: multiple networks, multiple phases. Acad. Manag. J. 48(5), 776–793 (2005)
Hemlin, S.: Creative knowledge environments for research groups in biotechnology. The influence of leadership and organizational support in universities and business companies. Scientometrics 67(1), 121–142 (2006)
Hobday, M., Rush, H., Tidd, J.: Innovation in complex products and system. Res. Policy 29(7), 793–804 (2000)
Ibarra, H., Andrews, S.B.: Power, social influence, and sense making: effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Adm. Sci. Q. 38(2), 277–303 (1993)
Inkpen, A.C., Tsang, E.W.: Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Acad. Manag. Rev. 30(1), 146–165 (2005)
Jick, T.D.: Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Adm. Sci. Q. 24(4), 602–611 (1979)
Kahn, W.A.: Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad. Manag. J. 33(4), 692–724 (1990)
Khurana, A., Rosenthal, S.R.: Towards holistic “front ends” in new product development. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 15(1), 57–74 (1998)
Kijkuit, B., Van Den Ende, J.: The organizational life of an idea: integrating social network, creativity and decision-making perspectives. J. Manag. Stud. 44(6), 863–882 (2007)
Kim, J., Wilemon, D.: Focusing the fuzzy front-end in new product development. R&D Manag. 32(4), 269–279 (2002)
Klein, K.J., Lim, B., Saltz, J.L., Mayer, D.M.: How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Acad. Manag. J. 47(6), 952–963 (2004)
Kratzer, J., Leenders, O.T.A.J., Engelen, J.M.L.: Stimulating the potential: creative performance and communication in innovation teams. Creat. Innov. Manag. 13(1), 63–71 (2004)
Kratzer, J., Leenders, R.T.A., Van Engelen, J.M.: The social network among engineering design teams and their creativity: a case study among teams in two product development programs. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 28(5), 428–436 (2010)
Kumar, N., Stern, L.W., Anderson, J.C.: Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Acad. Manag. J. 36(6), 1633–1651 (1993)
Leenders, R.T.A., Van Engelen, J.M., Kratzer, J.: Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 20(1), 69–92 (2003)
Lubart, T.I.: Models of the creative process: past, present and future. Creat. Res. J. 13(3–4), 295–308 (2001)
MacCrimmon, K.R., Wagner, C.: Stimulating ideas through creative software. Manag. Sci. 40(11), 1514–1532 (1994)
Marsden, P.V.: Network data and measurement. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 16(16), 435–463 (1990)
Martin, J.A., Eisenhardt, K.M.: Rewiring: cross-business-unit collaborations in multibusiness organizations. Acad. Manag. J. 53(2), 265–301 (2010)
Miller, C.C., Cardinal, L.B., Glick, W.H.: Retrospective reports in organizational research: a reexamination of recent evidence. Acad. Manag. J. 40(1), 189–204 (1997)
Moenaert, R.K., De Meyer, A., Souder, W.E., Deschoolmeester, D.: R&D/marketing communication during the fuzzy front-end. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 42(3), 243–258 (1995)
Moorman, C., Miner, A.S.: The impact of organizational memory on new product performance and creativity. J. Mark. Res. 34(1), 91–106 (1997)
Nagasundaram, M., Dennis, A.R.: When a group is not a group: the cognitive foundation of group idea generation. Small Group Res. 24(4), 463–489 (1993)
Ozcan, P., Eisenhardt, K.M.: Origin of alliance portfolios: entrepreneurs, network strategies, and firm performance. Acad. Manag. J. 52(2), 246–279 (2009)
Perry-Smith, J.E.: Social yet creative: the role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Acad. Manag. J. 49(1), 85–101 (2006)
Perry-Smith, J.E., Shalley, C.E.: The social side of creativity: a static and dynamic social network perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 28(1), 89–106 (2003)
Pettigrew, A.M.: Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice. Organ. Sci. 1(3), 267–292 (1990)
Reagans, R., McEvily, B.: Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range. Adm. Sci. Q. 48(2), 240–267 (2003)
Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E.W.: Networks, diversity, and productivity: the social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. 12(4), 502–517 (2001)
Reid, S.E., De Brentani, U.: The fuzzy front end of new product development for discontinuous innovations: a theoretical model. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 21(3), 170–184 (2004)
Rodan, S., Galunic, C.: More than network structure: how knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strateg. Manag. J. 25(6), 541–562 (2004)
Sammarra, A., Biggiero, L.: Heterogeneity and specificity of inter-firm knowledge flows in innovation networks. J. Manag. Stud. 45(4), 800–829 (2008)
Shalley, C.E., Zhou, J., Oldham, G.R.: The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: where should we go from here? J. Manag. 30(6), 933–958 (2004)
Simonton, D.K.: Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46(6), 1273 (1984)
Smith, P.G., Reinertsen, D.G.: Developing Products in Half the Time. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1991)
Stevens, G.A., Burley, J.: 3,000 raw ideas = 1 commercial success. Res. Technol. Manag. 40(3), 16–27 (1997)
Sutton, R.I., Callahan, A.L.: The stigma of bankruptcy: spoiled organizational image and its management. Acad. Manag. J. 30(3), 405–436 (1987)
Sutton, R.I., Hargadon, A.: Brainstorming groups in context: effectiveness in a product design firm. Adm. Sci. Q. 41(4), 685–718 (1996)
Tichy, N.M., Tushman, M.L., Fombrun, C.: Social network analysis for organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 4(4), 507–519 (1979)
Verworn, B., Herstatt, C., Nagahira, A.: The fuzzy front end of Japanese new product development projects: impact on success and differences between incremental and radical projects. R&d Manag. 38(1), 1–19 (2008)
Watson, W.E., Kumar, K., Michaelsen, L.K.: Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Acad. Manag. J. 36(3), 590–602 (1993)
Weick, K.E.: Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1995)
Wiersema, M.F., Bantel, K.A.: Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Acad. Manag. J. 35 (1), 91–121 (1992)
Woodman, R.W., Sawyer, J.E., Griffin, R.W.: Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad. Manag. Rev. 18(2), 293–321 (1993)
Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2009)
Zhang, W., Zhang, Q.: Multi-stage evaluation and selection in the formation process of complex creative solution. Qual. Quant. 48(5), 2375–2404 (2014)
Zhang, W., Zhang, Q., Song, M.: How do individual-level factors affect the creative solution formation process of teams? Creat. Innov. Manag. 24(3), 508–524 (2015)
Zhou, J., Shin, S.J., Brass, D.J., Choi, J., Zhang, Z.: Social networks, personal values, and creativity: evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects. J. Appl. Psychol. 94(6), 1544 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, W., Li, Y., Zhang, W. et al. Social network evolution in creative process of CNPD teams: a case study of Chinese companies. Qual Quant 53, 143–181 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0740-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0740-7