Abstract
This study explores audience polarization through a finer-grained approach by using network analysis of people-meter data. We examine how sociodemographic and structural similarities between viewers contribute to similarities in their television viewing patterns in general and by channel type. This study provides a systematic and comprehensive account of audience behavior by integrating sociodemographics, structural factors, and content types that have rarely been examined in a single integrated model. The findings suggest that structural similarities continue to be important even in the highly selective media environment. Although individuals’ latitudes of choice have increased with the multitude of channel options, choices are not scattered over hundreds of channels based on sociodemographic attributes. Certain channels are viewed almost solely by individuals in a specific demographic category; however, many other channels have viewers across gender, age, and occupational categories. De facto polarization due to the number of channels included in viewers’ subscriptions leads to actual polarization only for entertainment content. The findings relate to a broader thesis on the flow of individuals’ attention to certain types of content and the long-term concerns about the creation of cocoons of self-selected content. This study demonstrates how network analysis can contribute to examining audience behavior.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The terms such as “structural similarity,” “structural variable,” “structural quality,” and the like that appear throughout the manuscript are used as is common in the audience behavior literature, not as they are used in the context of network analysis. In other words, these terms have no relation to network structure or network pattern. Rather, they refer to aspects of viewer availability such as multichannel subscription and time spent viewing television, consistent with the studies by Webster (2011) and Taneja et al. (2012, p. 954).
The data were retrieved from the homepage of the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning: http://www.msip.go.kr/www/brd/m_220/list.do.
The data in this sentence were retrieved from the homepage of the Korea Communications Commission: http://www.kcc.go.kr/tsi/etc/search/search/ASC_integrationsearch.jsp?page=A10010000.
References
Al-Hammadany, F.H., Heshmati, A.: Determinants of Internet use in Iraq. Int. J. Commun. 5, 1967–1989 (2011)
Bondad-Brown, B.A., Rice, R.E., Pearce, K.E.: Influences on TV viewing and online user-shared video use: demographics, generations, contextual age, media use, motivations, and audience activity. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 56(4), 471–493 (2012)
Borgatti, S.P.: NetDraw Network Visualization. Analytic Technologies, Harvard (2002)
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., Freeman, L.C.: Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Analytic Technologies, Harvard (2002)
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., Johnson, J.C.: Analyzing Social Networks. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2013)
Burris, V.: Interlocking directorates and political cohesion among corporate elites. Am. J. Sociol. 111, 249–283 (2005)
Chaffee, S.H., Metzger, M.J.: The end of mass communication? Mass Commun. Soc. 4(4), 365–379 (2001)
Chang, W., Park, H.W.: The network structure of the Korean blogosphere. J. Comput.-Med. Commun. 17(2), 216–230 (2012)
Cho, S., Kang, N.: Audience polarization. Korean. Journal of Broadcasting 22(5), 323–360 (2008)
Choi, S.: TV audience flow and channel dynamics: analysis of audience duplication with panel data of 2009 and 2012. Korean J. Broadcast. 27(5), 285–318 (2013)
Cooper, R., Tang, T.: Predicting audience exposure to television in today’s media environment: an empirical integration of active-audience and structural theories. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 53(3), 400–418 (2009)
Dekker, D., Krackhardt, D., Snijders, T.A.B.: Sensitivity of MRQAP tests to collinearity and autocorrelation conditions. Psychometrika 72, 563–581 (2007)
Ferguson, D.A.: Profile: channel repertoire in the presence of remote control devices, VCRs and cable television. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 36, 83–91 (1992)
Gerbner, G., Gross, L.: Living with television: the violence profile. J. Commun. 26(2), 172–194 (1976)
Hale, S.A.: Net increase? Cross-lingual linking in the blogosphere. J. Comput.-Med. Commun. 17(2), 135–151 (2012)
Hara, Y., Tomomune, Y., Shigemori, A.: Categorization of Japanese TV viewers based on program genres they watch. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 14, 87–117 (2004)
Heaney, M.T., Masket, S.E., Miller, J.M., Strolovitch, D.Z.: Polarized networks: The organizational affiliations of national party convention delegates. American Behavioral Scientist, 0002764212463354. (2012)
Heeter, C.: Program selection with abundance of choice: A process model. Hum. Commun. Res. 12, 126–152 (1985)
Hindman, D.B., Wiegand, K.: The big three’s prime-time decline: a technological and social context. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 52(1), 119–135 (2008)
Hollway, J., Koskinen, J.: Multilevel embeddedness: the case of the global fisheries governance complex. Soc. Netw. 44, 281–294 (2016)
Hsu, C.L., Park, S.J., Park, H.W.: Political discourse among key Twitter users: the case of Sejong city in South Korea. J. Contemp. East. Asia 12(1), 65–79 (2013)
Katz, E.: And deliver us from segmentation. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 546, 22–33 (1996)
Katz, E., Blumler, J.G., Gurevitch, M.: Uses and gratifications research. Public Opin. Quart. 37(4), 509–523 (1973)
Kim, S.J., Webster, J.G.: The impact of a multichannel environment on television news viewing: a longitudinal study of news audience polarization in South Korea. Int. J. Commun. 6, 838–856 (2012)
Krackardt, D.: QAP partialling as a test of spuriousness. Soc. Netw. 9(2), 171–186 (1987)
Ksiazek, T.B.: A network analytic approach to understanding cross-platform audience behavior. J. Media Econ. 24(4), 237–251 (2011)
Ksiazek, T.B., Malthouse, E.C., Webster, J.G.: News-seekers and avoiders: exploring patterns of total news consumption across media and the relationship to civic participation. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 54(4), 551–568 (2010)
Ksiazek, T.B., Webster, J.G.: Cultural proximity and audience behavior: the role of language in patterns of polarization and multicultural fluency. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 52(3), 485–503 (2008)
Lanham, R.A.: The Economics of Attention: Style and Substance in the Age of Information. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2006)
Lazarsfeld, P.F., Merton, R.K.: Friendship as a social process: a substantive and method- ological analysis. In: Berger, M. (ed.) Freedom and Control in Modern Society, pp. 18–66. Van Nostrand, New York (1954)
Lee, A.M.: News audiences revisited: theorizing the link between audience motivations and news consumption. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 57(3), 300–317 (2013)
Lee, H., Yang, J.: Political knowledge gaps among news consumers with different news media repertoires across multiple platforms. Int. J. Commun. 8, 597–617 (2014)
Li, L., Tian, G., Yan, W.: The network of interlocking directorates and firm performance in transition economies: evidence from China. J. Appl. Bus. Res. 29(2), 607–620 (2013)
Mares, M.L., Woodard IV, E.H.: In search of the older audience: adult age differences in television viewing. J. Broadcast. Electron Media. 50(4), 595–614 (2006)
McCarty, J.A., Shrum, L.J.: The role of personal values and demographics in predicting television viewing behavior: implications for theory and application. J. Advert. 22(4), 77–101 (1993)
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M.: Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 27, 415–444 (2001)
McQuail, D.: McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory, 6th edn. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2010)
Napoli, P.M.: Deconstructing the diversity principle. J. Commun. 49(4), 7–34 (1999)
Neuendorf, K.A., Atkin, D.J., Jeffres, L.W.: Reconceptualizing channel repertoire in the urban cable environment. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 45(3), 464–482 (2001)
O’keefe, G.J., Boyd, H.H., Brown, M.R.: Who learns preventive health care information from where: cross-channel and repertoire comparisons. Health Commun. 10(1), 25–36 (1998)
O’keefe, G.J., Ward, H.J., Shepard, R.: A repertoire approach to environmental information channels. Sci. Commun. 23(4), 392–409 (2002)
Peterson, R.A.: Problems in comparative research: the example of omnivorousness. Poetics 33(5), 257–282 (2005)
Prior, M.: News vs. entertainment: how increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 49(3), 577–592 (2005)
Prior, M.: The immensely inflated news audience: assessing bias in self-reported news exposure. Public Opin. Quart. 73(1), 893–908 (2009)
Shim, M.: A study on the television genre-using patterns of media users in converging age. Korean J. Broadcast. Res. 65, 175–220 (2007)
Taneja, H., Webster, J.G., Malthouse, E.C., Ksiazek, T.B.: Media consumption across platforms: identifying user-defined repertoires. New Media Soc. 14(6), 951–968 (2012)
Trilling, D., Schoenbach, K.: Patterns of news consumption in Austria: how fragmented are they? Int. J. Commun. 7, 929–953 (2013)
Webster, J.G.: Audience behavior in the new media environment. J. Commun. 36(3), 77–91 (1986)
Webster, J.G.: Beneath the veneer of fragmentation: television audience polarization in a multichannel world. J. Commun. 55(2), 366–382 (2005)
Webster, J.G.: The duality of media: a structurational theory of public attention. Commun. Theory 21(1), 43–66 (2011)
Webster, J.G., Ksiazek, T.B.: The dynamics of audience fragmentation: public attention in an age of digital media. J. Commun. 62(1), 39–56 (2012)
Webster, J.G., Phalen, P.F., Lichty, L.W.: Ratings Analysis: Audience Measurement and Analytics, 4th edn. Routledge, New York (2014)
Webster, J.G., Wakshlag, J.J.: A theory of television program choice. Commun. Res. 10(4), 430–446 (1983)
Yang, H., Jung, W.A.: Assessing knowledge structures for public research institutes. J. Contemp. Eastern Asia 15(1), 27–40 (2016)
Youn, S.: Profile: program type preference and program choice in a multichannel situation. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 38(4), 465–475 (1994)
Yuan, E.J.: Measuring diversity of exposure in Guangzhou’s television market. Asian J. Commun. 18(2), 155–171 (2008)
Yuan, E., Ksiazek, T.: A network analytic approach to audience behavior and market structure: the case of China and the US. Mass Commun. Soc. 18, 58–78 (2015)
Yuan, E.J., Webster, J.G.: Channel repertoires: using peoplemeter data in Beijing. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 50(3), 524–536 (2006)
Acknowledgement
This research was funded by the Republic of Korea’s Foundation for Broadcast Culture (http://www.fbc.or.kr) in 2014. In addition, the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Kookmin University, Republic of Korea approved this study as exempt from review (KMU-201406-HR-023).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choi, S. How do sociodemographic and structural similarities explain viewing pattern similarity by channel type? Insight from a network analytic approach. Qual Quant 51, 1093–1112 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0461-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0461-8