Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 50, Issue 6, pp 2571–2590 | Cite as

Childhood and capability deprivation in Italy: a multidimensional and fuzzy set approach

  • Antoanneta Potsi
  • Antonella D’Agostino
  • Caterina Giusti
  • Linda Porciani
Article

Abstract

In the last decades, starting with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Children in 1989, children’s quality of life have received a growing attention in scientific research, as well as in politics. This work aims to gain insights into Italian children’s living conditions and deprivation of capabilities using the Capability Approach, an alternative normative framework for the evaluation of human development, well-being and freedom by thinking in terms of human functionings and capabilities. From a methodological point of view we present an approach based on a fuzzy methodology applied to data from the EU-SILC 2009 ad-hoc module on children. The use of this methodology makes it possible to preserve the richness of the data available from the EU-SILC survey, that include both monetary and non monetary aspects of children deprivation. To get more insides into Italian children living conditions we also combine the fuzzy methodology with the capability approach at a disaggregated level of analysis by three social economic factors (single parent household, household educational level, macro-region of residence). Besides the well-known Italian North/South disparity of financial indicators—confirmed also for households with children—our findings suggest a new duality for Italian children quality of life, given by the multidimensional domains of deprivation internal or external to children’s households.

Keywords

Childhood studies Deprivation Well-being Children Fuzzy set approach Italy Capability approach 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the European Union FP7 project InGRID "Inclusive Growth Research Infrastructure Diffusion", GA no. 312691, http://www.inclusivegrowth.be.

References

  1. Addabbo, T., Di Tommaso, M.L., Maccagnan, A.: Gender differences in italian children capabilities. Fem. Econ. 20, 90–121 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Addabbo T., Di Tommaso M.L.: Children capabilities and family characteristics in Italy. Paper Prepared for the 30th General Conference of the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, Portoroz, 24–30 August (2008)Google Scholar
  3. Addabbo T., Facchinetti G.: The fuzzy logic and the capability approach. CAP Paper No. 106 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. Alkire, S.: Choosing dimensions: the capability approach and multidimensional poverty. MPRA Paper No. 8862 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. Bäckman, O., Nilsson, A.: Pathways to social exclusion—a life-course study. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 27(1), 107–123 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berti, F., D’Agostino, A., Lemmi, A., Neri, L.: Poverty and deprivation of immigrants vs. natives in Italy. Int. J. Soc. Econ. 41(8), 630–649 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Betti, G., Gagliardi, F., Lemmi, A., Verma, V.: Comparative measures of multidimensional deprivation in the european union. Empir. Econ. (2015). doi: 10.1007/s00181-014-0904-9 Google Scholar
  8. Betti, G., Cheli, B., Lemmi, A., Verma, V.: Multidimensional and longitudinal poverty: an integrated fuzzy approach. In: Lemmi, A., Betti, G. (eds.) Fuzzy Set Approach to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement, pp. 111–137. Springer, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  9. Bühler-Niederberger, D., König, A.: Childhood as a resource and laboratory for the self-project. Childhood 18(2), 180–195 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. Biggeri M., Ballet, J., Comim, F. (eds.): Children and the capability approach studies in childhood and youth. Palgrave Macmillan (2011)Google Scholar
  11. Biggeri, M., Libanora, R., Mariani, S., Menchini, L.: Children establishing their capabilities: preliminary results of the survey during the first children’s world congress on child labour. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on the Capability Approach, Enhancing Human Security, University of Pavia, (2004). http://cfs.unipv.it/ca2004/papers/biggeri.pdf
  12. Biggeri, M., Libanora, R., Mariani, S., Menchini, L.: children conceptualizing their capabilities: results of a survey conducted during the first children’s world congress on child labour. J. Hum. Dev. Capab. Taylor Fr. J. 7(1), 59–83 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. Biggeri, M.: Children’s valued capabilities. In: Walker, M., Unterhalter, E. (eds.) Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach and Social Justice in Education. Palgrave McMillan, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  14. Bradshaw, J., Chzhen, Y., de Neubourg, C., Main, G., Martorano, B., Menchini, L.: Relative income poverty among children in rich countries. Innocenti Working Paper 2012–01 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. Brown, F.: The play behaviours of Roma children in Transylvania. Int. J. Play 1(1), 64–74 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cheli, B., Lemmi, A.: A totally fuzzy and relative approach to the multidimensional analysis of poverty. Econ. Notes 24(1), 115–134 (1995)Google Scholar
  17. Chen, W.-H., Corak, M.: Child poverty and changes in child poverty’. Demography 45(3), 537–553 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chiappero Martinetti, E.: A new approach to evaluation of well-being and poverty by fuzzy set theory. Giornale Degli Economisti e Annali di Economia 53, 367–388 (1994)Google Scholar
  19. Chiappero Martinetti, E.: A multi-dimensional assessment of well-being based on Sen’s functioning theory. Revista Internazionale di Scienza Soziali 8(2), 207–239 (2000)Google Scholar
  20. Chiappero-Martinetti, E.: Capability approach and fuzzy set theory: description, aggregation and inference. In: Lemmi, A., Betti, G. (eds.) Fuzzy Set Approach to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. Springer, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  21. Comim, F., Ballet, J., Biggeri, M., Iervese, V.: Introduction-theoretical foundations and the book’s roadmap. In: Biggeri, M., B, J., Comim, Flavio (eds.) Children and the Capability Approach Studies in Childhood and Youth. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2011)Google Scholar
  22. Cronbach, L.J.: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 297–333 (1951)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Danby, S., Baker, C.: What is the problem? Restoring social order in the preschool classroom. In: Hutchby, I., Moran-Ellis, J. (eds.) Children and Social Competence: Arenas of Action, pp. 157–186. Falmer Press, London (1998)Google Scholar
  24. Daniele, V., Malanima, P.: II Divario Nord-Sud in Italia 1861–2011. Soveria Mannelli, Rubbettino (2011)Google Scholar
  25. Dean, H.: Critiquing capabilities: the distractions of a beguiling concept. Crit. Soc. Policy 29(1), 261–278 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Di Tommaso, M.L.: Children capabilities: a structural equation model for India. J. Socio-Econ. 36, 436–450 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. European Commission: EU-SILC Module on material deprivation. (2009)Google Scholar
  28. European Commission: Child poverty and child well-being in the European Union. DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Unit E.2 vol I: Main report (2010)Google Scholar
  29. Facer, K., Holmes, R., Lee, N.: Editorial. Glob. Stud. Child. 2(3), 170–175 (2012). doi: 10.2304/gsch.2012.2.3.170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Istat: Uso del tempo e ruoli di genere. Tra lavoro e famiglia nel ciclo di vita. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica, Roma (2012)Google Scholar
  31. Istat: Rapporto annuale 2014: La situazione del Paese. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica, Roma (2014)Google Scholar
  32. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E.: Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2009)Google Scholar
  33. Hawthorn, G. (ed.): The Standard of Living. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  34. Johson, E., Sherradon, M.S.: From financial literacy to financial capability among youth. J. Sociol. Soc. Welf. 30(9), 119–145 (2007)Google Scholar
  35. Klasen, S.: Measuring poverty and deprivation in South Africa. Rev. Income Wealth 46(1), 33–58 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Klasen, S.: Social exclusion, children and education: implications of a rights-based approach. Eur. Soc. 3(4), 413–445 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Krueger, A.B., Lindahl, M.: Education for growth: why and for whom? J. Econ. Lit. 39(4), 1101–1136 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lemmi, A., Verma, V., Betti, G., Neri, L., Gagliardi, F., Tarditi, G., Ferretti, C., Kordos, J., Panek, T., Szukiełojć-Bieńkuńska, A., Szulc, A., Zięba, A.: Multidimensional and fuzzy indicators developments. Project Small Area Methods for Poverty and Living Conditions Estimates. No. EU-FP7-SSH-2007–2011 (2010)Google Scholar
  39. Maccagnan, A.: Measuring the interaction between parents and children in Italian families: a structural equation approach. Working Paper 645, Department of Political Economics, Universitá di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, (2011)Google Scholar
  40. Neubourg de, C., Bradshaw, J., Chzhen, Y., Main, G., Martorano, B. and Menchini, L.: Child deprivation, multidimensional poverty and monetary poverty in Europe. Innocenti Working Paper 2012–02 (2012)Google Scholar
  41. Neubourg de, C., Plavgo I.:. Lost in dimensions, choices in multidimensional poverty analysis critically reviewed. UNICEF, Innocenti Working Paper, (2012)Google Scholar
  42. Nunnally, J.C., Bernstein, I.H.: Psychometric Theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  43. Nussbaum, M.: Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nussbaum, M.: Education and democratic citizenship: capabilities and quality education. J. Hum. Dev. 7(3), 385–395 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nussbaum, M.: Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. OECD: Doing Better for Children. OECD Publishing (2009)Google Scholar
  47. Qizilbash, M., Clark, D.A.: The capability approach and fuzzy poverty measures: an application to the South African Context. Soc. Indic. Res. 74, 103–139 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Qvortrup, J.: Childhood matters: an introduction. In: Qvortrup, J., Bardy, M., Sgritta, G., Wintersberger, H. (eds.) Childhood Matters. Social Theory, Practice and Politics, pp. 1–24. Avebury, Aldershot (1994)Google Scholar
  49. United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/crc.pdf (1989). Accessed 29 Sept 2015
  50. Robeyns, I.: The capability approach: an interdisciplinary introduction. Paper presented to the Training Course preceding the 3rd International Conference on the Capability Approach, Pavia, (2003). http://www.soc.spbu.ru/img/up/files/File/1.8%20Robeyns%20The%20Capability%20Approach.%20An%20Interdisciplinary%20Introduction.pdf
  51. Raynor, J.: Education and capabilities in Bangladesh. In: Walker, M., Unterhalter, E. (eds.) Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach and Social Justice in Education. Palgrave McMillan, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  52. Richardson, D., Hoelscher, P., Bradshaw, J.: Child well-being in central and eastern european countries (CEE) and the commonwealth of independent states (CIS). Child Indic. Res. 1(3), 211–250 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sen, A.K.: The Standard of Living: The Tanner Lectures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sen, A. K.: Breaking the poverty cycle—investing in early childhood. Keynote Address, Inter-American Development Bank, Sustainable Development Department, Social Department Division. Paris, (1999) http://www.unicef.org/lac/spbarbados/Implementation/ECD/BreakingPovertyCycle_ECD_1999.pdf
  55. Sen, A.: The Idea of Justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  56. Sutton, L.: The state of play: disadvantage, play and children’s well-being. Soc. Policy Soc. 7(4), 537–549 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sünker, H., Swiderek, T.: Politics of childhood, democracy and communal life: conditions of political socialization and education. Policy Futur. Educ. 5(3), 303–314 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tarki Social Research Institute: Child poverty and child well-being in the European Union. Report for the European Commission (2010)Google Scholar
  59. Terzi, L.: The capability to be educated. In: Walker, M., Unterhalter, E. (eds.) Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach and Social Justice in Education, pp. 25–43. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. UNICEF Office of Research: Child well-being in rich countries. A comparative overview. Innocenti Report Card 11, Florence (2013)Google Scholar
  61. UNICEF Office of Research: Children of the recession: the impact of the economic crisis on child well-being in rich countries. Innocenti Report Card 12, UNICEF Office of Research, Florence (2014)Google Scholar
  62. Wolf, J., De-Shalit, A.: Disadvantage. Oxford University Press, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Woodhead, M.: Changing perspectives on early childhood: theory, research and policy. Int. J. Equity Innov. Early Child. 4(2), 1–43 (2006)Google Scholar
  64. Zakaria, N.F., Sabri, M.F.: Review of financial capability studies. Int. J. Hum. Soc. Sci. 3(9), 197–203 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antoanneta Potsi
    • 1
  • Antonella D’Agostino
    • 2
  • Caterina Giusti
    • 3
  • Linda Porciani
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of Human and Social SciencesBergische University of WuppertalWuppertalGermany
  2. 2.Department of Management and Quantitative SciencesParthenope University of NaplesNaplesItaly
  3. 3.Department of Economics and ManagementUniversity of PisaPisaItaly
  4. 4.ISTAT-Regional Office-FlorenceFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations