Skip to main content
Log in

Tunisian constituent assembly elections: how does spatial proximity matter?

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis and Spatial Econometric modeling of the 2011 National Constituent Assembly elections (NCA) in Tunisia. By using electoral data at delegation level of the six main political parties (Ennahda, Congress of the Republic, Ettakatol, the Democratic Progressive Party, the Petition and the Democratie Modernist Pole), we show that geographical proximity matters in Tunisia’s voting behavior. The results overwhelmingly support the spatial Durbin model, including spatially weighted independent variables, as the best model to explain the voting phenomenon. Employing LeSage and Pace’s approach, we find that the largest direct and indirect effects are associated with age cohort and level of educational attainment. Voters who live in poorer neighborhoods are more likely to support the Petition list. Our results also show that younger voters are more likely to vote Ennahda, while older voters with high educational attainment are more likely to support Ettakatol and the Democratie Modernist Pole parties. Men are more likely to support Congress of the Republic than women voters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. National Democratic Institute: Final report on the National Constituent Assembly Elections.

  2. Instance Supérieure Indépendante pour les Elections.

  3. Decree-law 27 (18 April 2011) establishes the ISIE, including its membership and responsibilities (see the electoral law for more details).

  4. AfDB African Development Bank (AfDB) Group, 2012 ‘Tunisia: Economic and Social Challenges Beyond the Revolution’.

  5. INS, “Mesure de la pauvreté et des inégalités en Tunisie 2000–2010 ” (http://www.ins.tn).

  6. Data available on www.isie.tn.

  7. The 2004 census and the 2005 national survey of household consumption are available on www.ins.nat.tn.

  8. By imposing certain restrictions to the SDM model, we can get the SEM and SAR specifications. In particular, if \(\theta = 0\) the SDM reduces to the SAR model. If the restriction \(\theta =-\rho \delta \) is imposed, the SDM is a simplified representation of SEM model.

  9. We use the first-order neighbors matrix for the Moran scatterplot and local Moran’s significance map. Complete results with higher order neighbor weights are available upon request from the authors.

  10. Ofcom Broadcast Bulletin, Issue 204, 23 April 2012.

    Fig. 4
    figure 4

    Local Moran’s significance map of vote-share

  11. Great Tunis is composed of the following four governorates: Tunis (the capital), Ariana, Ben Arous and Manouba.

  12. Although the OLS results are not included in this paper, they are available from the authors upon request.

    Table 4 Model specification tests: spatial error or spatial lag

References

  • Aghrout, A.: The National Constituent Assembly election in Tunisia, October 2011. Elect. Stud. 34, 294–299 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amara, M., Ayadi, M.: The local geographies of welfare in Tunisia: does neighbourhood matter? Int. J. Soc. Welf. 22(1), 90–103 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L.: Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, vol. 4. Springer, Berlin (1988)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L.: Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geogr. Anal. 27(2), 93–115 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., Bera, A.K., Florax, R., Yoon, M.J.: Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 26(1), 77–104 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L.: The Moran scatterplot as an ESDA tool to assess local instability in spatial association. In: Fischer, H.S.M., Unwin, D. (eds.) Spatial Analytical Perspectives on GIS, pp. 111–125. Taylor & Francis, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., Sridharan, S., Gholston, S.: Using exploratory spatial data analysis to le-verage social indicator databases: the discovery of interesting patterns. Soc. Indic. Res. 82(2), 287–309 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayeb, H.: Social and political geography of the Tunisian revolution: the alfa grass revolution. Rev. Afr. Polit. Econ. 38(129), 467–479 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A., Carty, R.K.: Does proportional representation foster voter turnout? Eur. J. Polit. Res. 18, 167–181 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A., Aarts, K.: Electoral systems and turnout. Acta Politica 41(2), 180–196 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bühlmann, M., Freitag, M.: Individual and contextual determinants of electoral partici-pation. Swiss Polit. Sci. Rev. 12(4), 13–47 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, K.R.: The voting decision in a spatial context. Prog. Geogr. 1(1), 81–117 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G.: Electoral rules and electoral coordination. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 2(1), 145–161 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutts, D., Webber, D.: Voting patterns, party spending and relative location in England and Wales. Reg. Stud. 44(6), 735–760 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darmofal, D.: The political geography of macro-level turnout in American political deve-lopment. Polit. Geogr. 25(2), 123–150 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst, J.P.: Applied spatial econometrics: raising the bar. Spat. Econ. Anal. 5(1), 9–28 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint, C.: A timespace for electoral geography: economic restructuring, political agency and the rise of the nazi party. Polit. Geogr. 20(3), 301–329 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gana, A., Van Hamme, G., Ben Rebah, M.: Géographie électorale et disparités socio-territoriales : les enseignements des élections pour l’assemblée constituante en Tunisie. L’Espace Politique. Revue en ligne de géographie politique et de géopolitique (18) (2012)

  • Getis, A., Aldstadt, J.: Constructing the spatial weights matrix using a local statistic. Perspect. Spat. Data Anal. 147–163 (2010)

  • Gimpel, J., Karnes, K., McTague, J., Pearson-Merkowitz, S.: Distance-decay in the poli-tical geography of friends-and-neighbors voting. Polit. Geogr. 27(2), 231–252 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grofman, B., Selb, P.: Turnout and the (effective) number of parties at the national and district levels: a puzzle-solving approach. Party polit. 17(1), 93–117 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, R.W.: Political institutions and voter turnout in the industrial democracies. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 81, 405–423 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R., Pattie, C., Dorling, D., MacAllister, I., Tunstall, H., Rossiter, D.: Local context, retrospective economic evaluations, and voting: the 1997 general election in England and Wales. Polit. Behav. 22(2), 121–143 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R., Jones, K., Sarker, R., Propper, C., Burgess, S., Bolster, A.: Party support and the neighbourhood effect: spatial polarisation of the British electorate, 1991–2001. Polit. Geogr. 23(4), 367–402 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R.J., Propper, C., Burgess, S., Sarker, R., Bolster, A., Jones, K.: Spatial scale and the neighbourhood effect: multinomial models of voting at two recent British general elections. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 35(3), 487–514 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Elliott, E., Wang, D.: A spatial analysis of county-level outcomes in US presi-dential elections: 1988–2000. Elect. Stud. 22(4), 741–761 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, K., Marsh, M.: Varieties of election studies. Elect. Stud. 21(2), 169–187 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korotayev, A., Zinkina, J.V.: Egyptian revolution: a demographic structural analysis. Entelequia: revista interdisciplinar (13), 139–169 (2011)

  • LaGraffe, D.: The youth bulge in Egypt: an intersection of demographics, security, and the Arab Spring. J. Strat. Secur. 5(2), 65–80 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, A.: Economic voting and electoral behavior: how do individual, local, and national factors affect the partisan choice? Econ. Polit. 17(2), 265–296 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage, J., Pace, R.K.: Introduction to Spatial Econometrics, vol. 196. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mabrouk, M.: A revolution for dignity and freedom: preliminary observations on the social and cultural background to the Tunisian revolution. J. North Afr. Stud. 16(4), 625–635 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mészáros, J., Solymosi, N., Speiser, F.: Spatial distribution of political parties in Hungary 1990–2006. Polit. Geogr. 26(7), 804–823 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, K., Moretti, E., Oreopoulos, P.: Does education improve citizenship? Evidence from the United States and the United Kingdom. J. Public Econ. 88(9), 1667–1695 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P.A.P.: The interpretation of statistical maps. J. Royal Stat. Soc. B 10, 243–251 (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P.A.P.: A test for serial correlation of residuals. Biometrica 37, 178–181 (1950)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattie, C., Johnston, R.: ‘People who talk together vote together’: an exploration of contextual effects in Great Britain. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 90(1), 41–66 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelkonen, P.: Length of compulsory education and voter turnout-evidence from a staged reform. Public Choice 150(1–2), 51–75 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reith, N.: Tunisia’s Jasmine revolution: A geo-spatial demographic analysis of protest, vio-lence, and voting patterns. Extended Abstract (Population Association of America, 2013 Annual Meeting Program) (2013)

  • Sauerzopf, R., Swanstrom, T.: The urban electorate in presidential elections, 1920–1996. Urban Aff. Rev. 35(1), 72–91 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, M., Agnew, J.: The geographical dynamics of Italian electoral change, 1987–2001. Elect. Stud. 26(2), 287–302 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapiador, F., Mezo, J.: Vote evolution in Spain, 1977–2007: a spatial analysis at the municipal scale. Polit. Geogr. 28(5), 319–328 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unwin, A., Unwin, D.: Spatial data analysis with local statistics. J. Royal Stat. Soc. 47(3), 415–421 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Egmond, M., De Graaf, N.D., Van Der Eijk, C.: Electoral participation in The Netherlands: individual and contextual influences’. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 34(2), 281–300 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilalta, C.: The local context and the spatial diffusion of multiparty competition in urban Mexico, 1994–2000. Polit. Geogr. 23(4), 403–423 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Amara.

Additional information

This paper is dedicated to the people of Tunisia, and to those who gave their lives for dignity and freedom.

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 6
figure 6

Map of Tunisia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amara, M., El Lahga, A. Tunisian constituent assembly elections: how does spatial proximity matter?. Qual Quant 50, 65–88 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0137-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0137-1

Keywords

Navigation