Quality & Quantity

, Volume 49, Issue 4, pp 1661–1677 | Cite as

Modelling a sustainable requalification problem by analytic hierarchy process

  • Virginia Racioppi
  • Gabriella Marcarelli
  • Massimo Squillante


Decision problems are often characterized by a great number of alternative actions and by the complexity of relationships between factors involved in the process. This leads to the determination of alternative choices in uncertainty conditions. In this paper the problem of an energetic and environmental requalification is analyzed. This kind of problem emphasizes the need for integration of economics and environment so a multicriteria approach is required; in particular the analytic hierarchy process is applied and a detailed sensitivity analysis is performed by using a software package, Expert Choice.


Analytic hierarchy process Sensitivity analysis Eco-sustainable requalification Environmental assessments 


  1. Belton, V., Gear, T.: On a shortcoming of Saaty’s method of analytic hierarchies. Omega 11, 228–230 (1983)Google Scholar
  2. Cavallo, B., D’Apuzzo, L., Squillante, M.: About a consistency index for pairwise comparison matrices over a divisible alo-group. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2, 153–175 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. D’Apuzzo, L., Marcarelli, G., Squillante, M.: Analysis of qualitative and quantitative rankings in multicriteria decision making. In: Lux, T., Faggini, M. (eds.) Economics from Tradition to Complexity, vol. parte IV, pp. 157–170. Heidelberg:Springer, Berlin (2009)Google Scholar
  4. D’Apuzzo, L., Marcarelli, G., Squillante, M.: “Gcneralized consislency and intensity vector for comparison matrices”. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 22(12), 1287–1300 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fusco Girard, L., Nijkamp, P., Energia, bellezza, partecipazione: la sfida della sostenibilità. Valutazioni integrate tra conservazione e sviluppo, Franco Angeli, Milano (2005)Google Scholar
  6. Marcarelli, G., Racioppi, V., Squillante, M.: “Energetic-environmental requalification for tourist accomodation facilities by analytic hierarchy process”, In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Communications, Computing and Control Applications (CCCA) 2012, Marseille, IEEE, ISBN 978-1-4673-4694-8Google Scholar
  7. Narasimhan, R.: A geometric averaging procedure for constructing super transitive approximation to binary comparison matrices. Fuzzy Sets and Syst. 8, 53–61 (1982)Google Scholar
  8. Pohekar, S.D., Ramachandran, M.: Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning. Rev. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 8, 365–381 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Saaty, T.L.: How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24(6), 19–43 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Saaty, T.L.: Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Manag. Sci. 32(7), 841–855 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G.: Energy, health and transportation. The Logic of Priorities, in Applications in Business. Kluwer-Nijhoff, Boston (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)Google Scholar
  13. Vargas, L.G.: An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48, 2–8 (1990)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Virginia Racioppi
    • 1
  • Gabriella Marcarelli
    • 2
  • Massimo Squillante
    • 2
  1. 1.Cooperative Institute for the Innovation S.c.a.r.l.-ICIENaplesItaly
  2. 2.University of SannioBeneventoItaly

Personalised recommendations