Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 203–220 | Cite as

How and why: complementary analyses of social network structures and cultural values: improving flood response networks in Queensland, Australia

  • Elizabeth L. Malone
  • Susan Kinnear
Article

Abstract

Social network analysis (SNA) is well recognized as a tool for informing climate change adaptation; however, this methodology is limited by a focus on quantitative structural analyses (how many nodes and ties exist, and between whom), rather than accessing richer information about their meaning (value content of ties). One way to improve the usefulness of SNA is to purposefully complement the structural analysis with cultural elements that can be drawn from field datasets. In this network-governance case study from Queensland, Australia, research on organizations involved in water management and flood responses events showed that cultural values were important in influencing network connections and preferred approaches to flood pre-planning and response. For example, there were differences in organizational preferences for the numbers and types of links that are rooted in different values. From this, Mary Douglas’ Cultural Theory categories of individualists, hierarchists, and egalitarians were extended to analyze the types of ties between network nodes, the preferred approaches of different types of organization, and the problematic links and missing links among network nodes. This work illustrates that analyses of both structural SNA and cultural values can be used to improve regional-level adaptation activities such as disaster management. Here, increased knowledge about social networks, network ties, and cultural values can facilitate a process of social learning that will help societies adapt to climate change impacts.

Keywords

Social network analysis Climate change adaptation  Disaster management Cultural Theory Central Queensland 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Australian National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility (NCCARF). The authors especially thank our NCCARF project manager, David Rissik; our research project team members, Kym Pattison, Vicki Ross, Julie Mann, Garry Robins and Dave Swain; and the survey participants.

References

  1. Apan, A., Keogh, D.U., King, D., Thomas, M., Mushtaq, S., Baddiley, P.: The 2008 Floods in Queensland: A Case Study of Vulnerability, Resilience and Adaptive Capacity. Report for the National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, Gold Coast (2010)Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, J., Dovers, S., Hatfield-Dodds, S., McDonald, J., Nelson, R., Waller, S.: National Climate Change Adaptation Research Plan: Social, Economic and Institutional Dimensions. National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, Gold Coast (2011)Google Scholar
  3. Berardo, R., Scholz, J.T.: Self-organizing policy networks: risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries. Am. J. Political Sci. 54(3), 632–649 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bodin, O., Crona, B., Ernstson, H.: Social networks in natural resource management: what is there to learn from a structural perspective? Ecol. Soc. 11(2), r2 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. Bodin, O., Crona, B.: The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference? Glob. Environ. Chang. 19(3), 366–374 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braun, V., Clark, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butts, C.T.: A relational event framework for social action. Sociol. Methodol. 38(1), 155–200 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. Comfort, L.K., Haase, T.W.: Communication, coherence, and collective action: the impact of Hurricane Katrina on communications infrastructure. Public Work. Manag. Policy 10(4), 328–343 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Douglas, M.: Cultural Bias. Occasional Paper #35 Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, London (1978)Google Scholar
  10. Dow, K., Haywood, B.K., Kettle, N.P., Lackstrom, K.: The role of ad hoc networks in supporting climate change adaptation: a case study from the Southeastern United States. Reg. Environ. Chang. (2013). doi: 10.1007/s10113-013-0440-8. http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10113-013-0440-8.pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2014
  11. Erikson, E.: Formalist and relationalist theory in social network analysis. Sociol. Theory 31(3), 219–242 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freeman, L.: Cliques, Galois lattices, and the structure of human social groups. Soc. Netw. 18, 173–187 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fűhse, J., Műtzel, S.: Tackling connections, structure, and meaning in networks: quantitative and qualitative methods in sociological network research. Qual. Quant. 45, 1067–1089 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Havlin, S., Kennett, D.Y., Ben-Jacob, E., Bunde, A., Cohen, R., Hermann, H.: Challenges in network science: applications to infrastructures, climate, social systems and economics. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 214, 273–293 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones, C., Hesterly, W.S., Borgatti, S.P.: A general theory of network governance: exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Acad. Manag. Rev. 22(4), 911–945 (1997)Google Scholar
  16. Kahan, D.M., Peers, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L.L., Braman, D., Mandel, G.: The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2, 732–735 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kapucu, N.: Interorganizational coordination in dynamic context: networks in emergency response management. Connections 26(2), 33–48 (2005)Google Scholar
  18. Kinnear, S., Patison, K., Mann, J., Malone, E., Ross, V.: Network governance and climate change adaptation: collaborative responses to the Queensland floods. Research report to the National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, March 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  19. Leiserowitz, A.: Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Clim. Chang. 77, 45–72 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin, N.: Building a network theory of social capital. Connections 22(1), 28–51 (1999)Google Scholar
  21. Luthe, T., Wyss, R., Schuckert, M.: Network governance and regional resilience to climate change: empirical evidence from mountain tourism communities in the Swiss Gotthard region. Reg. Environ. Chang. 12, 839–854 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Malone, E.L.: Debating Climate Change: Pathways Through Argument to Agreement. Earthscan, London (2009)Google Scholar
  23. Malone, E.L., Edgerton, S.A.: The strength of weak ties: the influence of horizontal research ties on national environmental policies. In: Biermann, F., Brohm, R., Dingwerth, K. (eds.) Global Environmental Change and the Nation State. Proceedings of the 2001 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. Potsdam, Germany (2002)Google Scholar
  24. McMaster, R., Baber, C.: Multi-agency operations: cooperation during flooding. Appl. Ergon. 43(1), 38–47 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mohr, J.W., White, H.C.: How to model an institution. Theory Soc. 37, 485–512 (2008). doi: 10.1007/s11186-008-9066-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Newman, L., Dale, A.: Network structure, diversity, and proactive resilience building: a response to Tompkins and Adger. Ecol. Soc. 10(1): r2 (2005). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/resp2/
  27. Newig, J., Gunther, D., Pahl-Wostl, C.: Synapses in the network: learning in governance networks in the context of environmental management. Ecol. Soc. 15(4), 24 (2010). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art24/. Retrieved 6 Feb 2014
  28. O’Brien, K.L., Wolf, J.: A values-based approach to vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. WIREs Clim. Chang. 1, 232–242 (2010)Google Scholar
  29. O’Riordan, T., Jordan, A.: Institutions, climate change and cultural theory: towards a common analytical framework. Glob. Environ. Chang. 9, 81–93 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pachucki, M.A., Brieger, R.L.: Cultural holes: beyond relationality in social networks and culture. In Annual Review of Sociology. www.annualreviews.org (2010)Google Scholar
  31. Pendergraft, C.A.: Human dimensions of climate change: cultural theory and collective action. Clim. Chang. 39, 643–666 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Prabhakar, S.V.R.K., Srinivasan, A., Shaw, R.: Climate change and local level disaster risk reduction planning: need, opportunities and challenges. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 14, 7–33 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Provan, K.G., Kenis, P.: Modes of network governance: structure, management and effectiveness. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 18, 229–252 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Provan, K.G., Milward, H.B.: Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Adm. Rev. 61(4), 414–423 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rayner, S., Malone, E.L.: Climate change, poverty, and intragenerational equity: the national level. J. Glob. Environ. Issues 1(2), 175–200 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Robins, G., Bates, L., Pattison, P.: Network governance and environmental management: conflict and cooperation. Public Adm. 89, 1293–1313 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stein, C., Ernstson, H., Barron, J.: A social network approach to analyzing water governance: The case of the Mkindo catchment, Tanzania. Phys. Chem. Earth 36(14–15), 1085–1092 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thompson, M., Ellis, R., Wildavsky, A.: Cultural Theory. Westview, Boulder, CO (1990)Google Scholar
  39. Thompson, M., Rayner, S., Gerlach, L.P., Grubb, M., Lach, D., Ney, S., Paterson, M., Rose, A., Timmerman, P.: Cultural discourses. In: Rayner, S., Malone, E.L. (eds.) Human Choice and Climate Change. The Societal Framework, vol. 1. Battelle Press, Columbus, OH (1998)Google Scholar
  40. Timmerman, P.: Myths and paradigms of interactions between development and environment. In: Clark, W.C., Munn, R. (eds.) Sustainable Development of the Biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)Google Scholar
  41. Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Joint Global Change Research InstituteCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.Central Queensland UniversityNorth RockhamptonAustralia

Personalised recommendations