Quality & Quantity

, Volume 48, Issue 6, pp 3037–3051 | Cite as

Quality and quantity in the construction and validation of a psychological test for the assessment and selection of aspiring volunteer rescuers: the action-research in an Italian health association

  • Riccardo Sartori
  • Andrea Ceschi
  • Serena Cubico
  • Giuseppe Favretto


The paper reports the results of the qualitative actions and the quantitative operations carried out in order to construct and validate a psychological test specifically developed for the assessment and selection of aspiring volunteer rescuers in an Italian health association. The qualitative actions consisted of 4 focus groups with volunteer rescuers (from 10 to 12 people each, 45 in total) and 2 group discussions with the leaders of the association (6 leaders in total). They have led to a 20-item test measuring such psychological constructs as Attitude (9 items) and Reasoning (11 items). The quantitative operations involved a pilot sample of 54 volunteer rescuers and have been run at the moment by involving a test sample of 481 candidates volunteer rescuers. Descriptive statistical analyses, principal component analyses with Cronbach’s alphas and item–total correlations have shown good indexes of fit in relation to the theoretical model that generated the 20 items and the test on the whole, even if improvements can be achieved. The test will be continually administered over the years (at least two administrations per year) in order to meet the needs for assessment and selection of the association, so other samples will be involved, validity and reliability will be continually monitored and the test will be modified if necessary.


Assessment and selection Volunteer rescuers  Construction and validation of a dedicated psychological test 


  1. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn. Text Revised (2000)Google Scholar
  2. Archer, R.P., Buffington-Vollum, J.K., Handel, R.W.: A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists. J. Pers. Assess. 87, 84–94 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berger, W., Coutinho, E.S.F., Figueira, I., Marques-Portella, C., Luz, M.P., Neylan, T.C., Marmar, C.R., Mendlowicz, M.V.: Rescuers at risk: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of the worldwide current prevalence and correlates of PTSD in rescue workers. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 47, 1001–1011 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Briggs, E., Peterson, M., Gregory, G.: Toward a better understanding of volunteering for nonprofit organizations: explaining volunteers’ pro-social attitudes. J. Macromarketing 30, 61–76 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chacon, F., Perez, T., Flores, J., Vecina, M.L.: Motives for volunteering: categorization of volunteers’ motivations using open-ended questions. Psychol. Spain 15, 48–56 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. Cronbach, L.J., Meehl, P.E.: Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol. Bull. 52, 281–302 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dolce, A., Ricciardi, M.: Impact of psychological risk factors on disaster rescue operations: the case of Italian volunteers. Disasters 31, 91–103 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dolce, A., Ricciardi, M., Tarantolo, T.: Lineamenti socio-demografici e fattori di rischio di disagio psicologico nel soccorritore volontario della Protezione Civile italiana. In: Giannantonio, M. (a cura di) Psicotraumatologia e Psicologia dell’emergenza, Ecomind, Salerno (2005)Google Scholar
  9. Fassio, O., Galati, D.: L’operatore in un contesto di emergenza: motivazioni ed emozioni. Psicologia della Salute 1, 13–26 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. Galati, D., Fassio, O., Viglino, M.: Motivazioni ed emozioni dei medici e degli infermieri del Pronto Soccorso: dall’interesse allo stress e burnout. Nuove Tendenze della Psicologia 2, 393–412 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. Haan, N., Smith, M.B., Block, J.: Moral reasoning of young adults: political–social behavior, family background, and personality correlates. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 10, 183–201 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kline, P.: The New Psychometrics. Routledge, London (1998)Google Scholar
  13. Lammers, J.C.: Attitudes, motives, and demographic predictors of volunteer commitment and service duration. J. Soc. Serv. Res. 14, 125–140 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lilienfeld, S.O., Wood, J.M., Garb, H.N.: What’s wrong with this picture? Sci. Am. 284, 80–87 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marta, E., Pozzi, M.: Psicologia del volontario. Carocci, Roma (2007)Google Scholar
  16. Maslach, C. Burnout: the cost of caring. Malor Books (2003)Google Scholar
  17. McDermott, B.E.: Psychological testing and the assessment of malingering. Psychiatr. Clin. N. Am. 35, 855–876 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meneghini, A.M., Sartori, R.: Il ruolo della tendenza empatica nel motivare il nonobligatory helping: una ricerca su un gruppo di volontari. Psicologia di Comunità 2, 95–106 (2011)Google Scholar
  19. Nunnally, J.C.: Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  20. Petrone, L. Emergenza in Italia. In: Lo Iacono, M., Troiano, M. (a cura di) Psicologia dell’emergenza. Editori Riuniti, Roma (2002)Google Scholar
  21. Pietrantoni, L., Prati, G.: Psicologia dell’emergenza. il Mulino, Bologna (2009)Google Scholar
  22. Ranci, C.: Il volontariato. il Mulino, Bologna (2006)Google Scholar
  23. Sartori, R.: Psicol. psicometrica. LED, Milano (2008)Google Scholar
  24. Sartori, R.: Tecniche proiettive e strumenti psicometrici per l’indagine di personalità,Approccio idiografico e approccio nomotetico a confronto. LED, Milano (2010a)Google Scholar
  25. Sartori, R.: Psychological assessment as a psychotherapy phase: a cognitive behavioral example between idiographic (clinical) and nomothetic (psychometric) approach. Rivista di Psicol., Clin. 2, 67–79 (2010b)Google Scholar
  26. Sartori, R.: Face validity in personality tests: psychometric instruments and projective techniques in comparison. Qual. Quant. 44, 749–759 (2010c)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sartori, R., Ceschi, A.: Assessment and development centers: judgment biases and risks of using idiographic and nomothetic approaches to collecting information on people to be evaluated and trained in organizations. Qual. Quant. 47, 3277–3288 (2013). doi: 10.1007/s11135-012-9718-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sartori, R., Pasini, M.: Quality and quantity in test validity: how can we be sure that psychological tests measure what they have to? Qual. Quant. 41, 359–374 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sbattella, F.: Manuale Psicol. dell’emergenza. Franco Angeli, Milano (2009)Google Scholar
  30. Slaney, K.L., Storey, J.E., Barnes, J.: Is my test valid? Guidelines for the practicing psychologist for evaluating the psychometric properties of measures. Int. J. Forensic Mental Health 10, 261–283 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stolinski, A.M., Ryan, C.S., Hausmann, L.R.M., Wernli, M.A.: Empathy, guilt, volunteer experiences, and intentions to continue volunteering among buddy volunteers in an AIDS organization. J. Appl. Biobehav. Res. 9, 1–22 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sundeen, R.A.: Differences in personal goals and attitudes among volunteers. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q. 21, 271–291 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Taddei, S., Cenerini, M.V., Duccio, V.: Domande, risorse e burnout in emergenza: un’indagine sugli operatori del 118. Psicol. della Salute 2, 43–59 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Riccardo Sartori
    • 1
  • Andrea Ceschi
    • 1
  • Serena Cubico
    • 2
  • Giuseppe Favretto
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Education, PsychologyUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Business AdministrationUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly

Personalised recommendations