Quality & Quantity

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 1739–1752 | Cite as

Evaluation of sustainability reporting practices in Poland

  • Patrycja Hąbek


This paper examines voluntary sustainability reporting practices in Poland. The number of these types of reports published by companies from year to year increases however the form, content and quality of these reports varies. Disclosure of economic, social and environmental performance demonstrates social responsibility of a company and therefore, the author first has analysed in this paper the level of implementation of the corporate social responsibility (CSR) concept in Polish companies. Then the attention was focused on sustainability reports published in 2011. The questionnaire to evaluate the quality and type of the disclosed information in sustainability reports consisted of twenty three criteria grouped in five categories. The author discusses the overall results as well as results obtained in the particular categories. The analyses indicate that sustainability reporting is not widespread among companies in Poland. On the other hand, increasing demands/expectations from stakeholders in this direction are not observed. In 2011, 32 reports were published, 6 of them have been audited by independent organizations and 19 have been developed in accordance with the GRI guidelines (Global reporting initiative sustainability reporting guidelines). Corporate social responsibility in Poland is a relatively new concept and although all events suggestive of the development of this concept, it is still little known and rarely implemented among entrepreneurs. The results of the study indicate that sustainability reporting practices in Poland, despite a few good examples and valuable disclosures, are at its early stage of development.


Corporate social responsibility Non-financial disclosure Reporting standards Stakeholders Sustainability report 


  1. Bartels, W., Iansen-Rogers, J., Kuszewski, J.: Count me in. The readers’ take on sustainability reporting. (2008). Accessed 10 Mar 2013
  2. Buhr, N.: Histories of and rationales for sustainability reporting. In: Unerman, J., Bebbington, J., O’Dwyer, B. (eds.) Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, pp. 57–69. Routledge, Abingdon (2007)Google Scholar
  3. Chen, S., Bouvain, P.: Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany. J. Bus. Ethics 87, 299–317 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clausen, J., Loew, T., Westermann, U.: Sustainability reporting in Germany: summary of the results and trends of the 2005 ranking. (2005). Accessed 14 Mar 2013
  5. Davis-Walling, P., Batterman, S.A.: Environmental reporting by the Fortune 50 firms. Environ. Manag. 21(6), 865–875 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dhaliwal, D., Li, O.Z., Tsang, A.H., Yang, Y.G.: Voluntary non-financial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: the case of corporate social responsibility reporting. Working Paper. University of Arizona (2009). Accessed 12 Jan 2013
  7. Eccles, R.G., Krzus, M.P.: One Report. Integrated Reporting for a Sustainable Strategy. Wiley, New Jersey (2010)Google Scholar
  8. Edelman Trust barometer. (2009). Accessed 14 Feb 2013
  9. Epstein, M.J.: Making Sustainability Work. Best Practices in Managing and Measuring Corporate Social, Environmental, and Economic Impacts. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield (2008)Google Scholar
  10. European Commission. Corporate Social Responsibility National public policies in the European Union. European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities. European Communities. (2007). Accessed 25 Jan 2013
  11. Flash Eurobarometer. Europeans’ attitudes towards the issue of sustainable consumption and production. Analytical report. No 256. (2009). Accessed 21 Jan 2013
  12. Fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978 on the annual accounts of certain types of companies, OJL 222, 14.8.1978Google Scholar
  13. Gazdar, K.: Reporting Nonfinancials. Wiley, Chichester (2007)Google Scholar
  14. GRI: Sustainability Reporting Statistics 2010. (2010). Accessed 21 Jan 2013
  15. Hąbek, P., Szewczyk, P.: Społeczna odpowiedzialność przedsiębiorstw a zarządzanie jakością. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, Gliwice (2010)Google Scholar
  16. Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P.: The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Bus. Rev. 70(January/February), 71–79 (1992)Google Scholar
  17. Kolk, A.: Sustainability reporting, VBA Journal 3. (2005). Accessed 23 Feb 2013
  18. Maignan, I., Ralston, D.A.: Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: insights from businesses’ self-representations. J. Int. Bus. Studi. 33(3), 497–514 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morhardt, J.E.: Scoring corporate environmental reports for comprehensiveness: a comparison of three systems. Environ. Manag. 26(6), 881–892 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morhardt, J.E., Baird, S., Freeman, K.: Scoring corporate environmental and sustainability reports using GRI 2000, ISO 14031 and other criteria. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 9, 215–233 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nam, Y., Barnett, G.A., Kim, D.: Corporate hyperlink network relationships in global corporate social responsibility system. Qual. Quant. (2013). doi: 10.1007/s11135-013-9831-7
  22. PARP: Ocena stanu wdrażania standardów społecznej odpowiedzialność biznesu. (2011). Accessed 21 Jan 2013
  23. Responsible Business Forum. Responsible Business in Poland 2011. Best Practices. (2011). Accessed 23 February 2013
  24. Reynolds, M., Yuthas, K.: Moral discourse and corporate social responsibility reporting. J. Bus. Ethics 78, 47–64 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schaltegger, S., Burritt, R.: Corporate sustainability accounting a catchphrase for compliant corporations or a business decision support for sustainability leaders? In: Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Burritt, R. (eds.) Sustainability Accounting and Reporting, pp. 37–59. Springer, Dordrecht (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., Chua, W.F.: Assurance on sustainability reports: an international comparison. Account. Rev. 84(3), 937–967 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tohmatsu, D.T.: Deloitte sustainability reporting scorecard. Deloitte and Touche global environment and sustainability services group, Copenhagen, pp. 3. Retrieved Nov 7, 2012 from (2002). Accessed 10 Jan 2013
  28. UNEP: Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu w Polsce. Wstępna analiza. UNEP, Warszawa (2007)Google Scholar
  29. Welzel, C., Peters, A., Höcker, U., Scholz, V.: The CSR Navigator. Public Policies in Africa, the Americas, Asia and Europe. Bertelsmann Stiftung/GTZ. (2007). Accessed 15 January 2013
  30. Wolniak, R., Drzewowska, E.: Humanistyczne aspekty TQM na przykładzie angielskiej organizacji. Problemy Jakości 1/2009, 39–45 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Organisation and ManagementSilesian University of TechnologyGliwicePoland

Personalised recommendations