Quality & Quantity

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 1027–1044 | Cite as

Investigating the Portrait Values Questionnaire at two transitions in adulthood: Retirement and University

  • Andrew Burr
  • Jonathan Bruce Santo
  • Dolores Pushkar


In this study, two issues regarding the use of the Portrait Value Questionnaire (PVQ; Schwartz et al.: J. Cross. Cult. Psychol. 32:519–542, 2001) with older adults were addressed: (1) whether the quasi-circumplex structure of values, developed on younger adult samples, also emerges among older adults; and (2) whether the PVQ demonstrates measurement invariance across age groups and equivalence over time. The 40-item version of the PVQ was completed by 433 retired adults and 173 university students in Montreal, Canada. In both retired and student samples, the quasi-circumplex structure of values emerged using exploratory techniques, but was not supported by constrained confirmatory factor analyses. A modified 26-item model was necessary to achieve adequate fit indices in both samples, suggesting problems of multi-collinearity and internal discriminant validity. However, using the revised 26-item model of the values, support was found for most types of measurement invariance across age groups and time. The PVQ should, therefore, be considered appropriate for use across the adult lifespan and in longitudinal research. Results are discussed with regard to the Schwartz (In: Zanna M (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press, pp. 1–65, 1992) value theory and the conceptualizing of values across the lifespan.


Values Portrait Value Questionnaire Measurement invariance  Measurement equivalence Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis 


  1. Braithewaite, V.A., Scott, W.A.: Values. In: Robinson, J.P., Shaver, P.R., Wrightsman, L.S. (eds.) Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes, pp. 661–753. Academic Press, New York (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bubeck, M., Bilsky, W.: Value structure at an early age. Swiss J. Psychol./Schweizerische Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Revue Suisse De Psychologie 63(1), 31–41 (2004). doi: 10.1024/1421-0185.63.1.31 Google Scholar
  3. Byrne, B.M., Shavelson, R.J., Muthen, B.: Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: the issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychol. Bull. 105, 456–466 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caprara, G.V., Caprara, M., Steca, P.: Personality correlates of adult development and aging. Eur. Psychol. 8, 131–147 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, J.: Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1983)Google Scholar
  6. Davidov., E. : A cross-country and cross-time comparison of the human values measurements with the second round of the European Social Survey. Surv. Res. Methods 2, 33–46 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., Schwartz, S.: Bringing values back in: testing the adequacy of the European Social Survey to measure values in 20 countries. Public Opin. Q. 72, 261–275 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Erikson, E.H.: The life cycle completed. Norton, New York (1982)Google Scholar
  9. Fischer, R., Schwartz, S.: Whence differences in value priorities? individual, cultural, or artifactual sources. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 42(7), 1127–1144 (2010). doi: 10.1177/0022022110381429 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grunert, S.C., Juhl, H.J.: Values, environmental attitudes, and buying of organic foods. J. Econ. Psychol. 16, 39–62 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C., Schulz, R.: A motivational theory of life-span development. Psychol. Rev. 117, 32–60 (2010). doi: 10.1037/a0017668 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hinz, A., Brähler, E., Schmidt, P., Albani, C.: Investigating the circumplex structure of the Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ). J. Individ. Differ. 26, 185–193 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim, J., Moen, P.: Retirement transitions, gender, and psychological well-being: a life-course approach. J. Gerontol. Psychol. Sci. 57B, P212–P222 (2002)Google Scholar
  14. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Knoppen, D., Saris, W.: Do we have to combine values in the Schwartz’ human values scale? A comment on the Davidov studies. Surv. Res. Methods 3, 90–103 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. Muthén, L.K., Muthén, B.O.: Mplus: Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables, 6th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles (2011)Google Scholar
  17. Perrinjaquet, A., Furrer, O., Usunier, J.C., Cestre, G., Valette-Florence, P.: A test of the quasi-circumplex structure of human values. J. Res. Pers. 41, 820–840 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ros, M., Schwartz, S.H., Surkiss, S.: Basic individual values, work values, and the meaning of work. Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. 48, 49–71 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S.H.: Values priorities and subjective well-being: direct relations and congruity effects. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 30, 177–198 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schwartz, S.H.: Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: Zanna, M. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, pp. 1–65. Academic Press, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  21. Schwartz, S.H.: Beyond individualism/collectivism: new dimensions of values. In: Kim, U., Triandis, H.C., Collectivism, C. (eds.) Theory Application and Methods. Sage, Newbury Park (1994)Google Scholar
  22. Schwartz, S.H., Bilsky, W.: Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 53, 550–562 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schwartz, S.H., Bilsky, W.: Toward a theory of the universal structure and content of values: extensions and cross-cultural replications. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58, 878–891 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schwartz, S.H., Boehnke, K.: Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. J. Res. Pers. 38, 230–255 (2004)Google Scholar
  25. Schwartz, S.H., Rubel, T.: Sex differences in value priorities: cross-cultural and multimethod studies. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 89, 1010–1028 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schwartz, S., Vecchione, M. (2011, July). A revised theory and new instrument to measure basic individual values. Paper Presented at the Regional Conference of the International Association of Cross-Cultural Psychology (IACCP) Istanbul: 25 Years Later: Self-Reflections and Future Directions. Istanbul, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  27. Schwartz, S.H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., Owens, V.E.: Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 32, 519–542 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Steinmetz, H., Schmidt, P., Tina-Booh, A., Schwartz, S.H., Wieczorek, S.: Testing measurement invariance using multi-group CFA: differences between educational groups in human values measurement. Qual. Quant. 43, 599–616 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Verkasalo, M., Lonnqvist, J.E., Lipsanen, J., Helkama, K.: European norms and equations for a two-dimensional presentation of values as measured with Schwartz’s 21 item Portrait Value Questionnaire. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 39, 780–792 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Burr
    • 1
  • Jonathan Bruce Santo
    • 1
  • Dolores Pushkar
    • 1
  1. 1.Concordia UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations