Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 47, Issue 6, pp 3423–3434 | Cite as

Applying structural equation modeling methodology to test validation: an example of cyberspace positive psychology scale

  • Sen-Chi Yu
  • Wei-Hsin Hsu
Article

Abstract

Although the structural equation modeling (SEM) methodology is a powerful tool for validating psychological measurements, few studies have used complete SEM-based indexes in test validation. This study developed and validated the cyberspace positive psychology scale (C-PPS) via SEM techniques. A total of 411 college students were recruited from four universities in Taiwan for the study. Hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis was used to test construct validity, and a structural model provided criterion-related validity. Reliability was reported via composite reliability. Results of the analyses show that the C-PPS demonstrated high reliability and good construct validity. Furthermore, criterion-related validity identified that although positive psychology in cyberspace and positive psychology in real life contexts are correlated, the two are also distinguishable. To conclude, the C-PPS is valid and reliable. The validation of the C-PPS indicates that college students can exhibit positive psychological traits in both the real and virtual worlds.

Keywords

Structural equation modeling Test validation Cyberspace positive psychology Positive psychology Well-being 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amichai-Hamburger Y., Furnham A.: The positive net. Comput. Human Behav. 23, 1033–1045 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagozzi R.P., Heatherton T.F.: A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self-esteem. Struct. Equ. Model. 1, 35–67 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradburn N.: The Structure of Psychological Well-being. Aldine, Chicago (1969)Google Scholar
  4. Campbell A., Converse P., Rodgers W.: The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfactions. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (1976)Google Scholar
  5. Chen H., Wigand R.T., Nilan M.: Exploring Web users’ optimal flow experiences. Inf. Technol. People 13(4), 263–281 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Csikszentmihalyi M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Collins, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  7. Diener E., Emmons R.A., Larsen R.J., Griffin S.: The Satisfaction with Life Scale. J. Pers. Assess. 49, 71–75 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duckworth A.L., Steen T.A., Seligman M.E.P.: Positive psychology in clinical practice. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 1, 629–651 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fordyce M.W.: A review of research on the happiness measures: a sixty second index of happiness and mental health. Soc. Indic. Res. 20, 355–381 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Joinson A.N.: Understanding the Psychology of Internet Behavior Virtual Worlds, Real Lives. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2003)Google Scholar
  11. Keyes C.L.M., Magyar-Moe J.L.: The measurement and utility of adult subjective well-being. In: Lopez, S.J., Snyder, C.R. (eds.) Positive Psychological Assessment: A Handbook of Models and Measures, pp. 411–426. American Psychological Association, Washington (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lyubomirsky S., Lepper H.: A measure of subjective happiness: preliminary reliability and construct validation. Soc. Indic. Res. 46, 137–155 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Park N., Peterson C., Seligman M.E.P.: Strengths in fifty-four nations and the fifty US states. J. Posit. Psychol. 1, 118–129 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Peterson C., Seligman M.E.P.: Character Strength and Virtues: A Handbook of Classification. Oxford University Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  15. Raykov T.: Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Appl. Psychol. Measur. 21, 173–184 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Scheir M., Carver C.: Dispositional optimism and physical well-being: the influence of generalized outcome expectancies on health. J. Person. 55(2), 169–210 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Seligman M.E.P.: Authentic Happiness: Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment. Free Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  18. Seligman M.E.P., Csikszentmihalyi M.: Positive psychology: an introduction. Am. Psychol. 55(1), 5–14 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Seligman M.E.P., Steen T.A., Park N., Peterson C.: Positive psychology progress: empirical validation of interventions. Am. Psychol. 60(5), 410–421 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Steger M.F., Frazier P., Oishi S., Kaler M.: The meaning in life questionnaire: assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. J. Couns. Psychol. 53, 80–93 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Watson D., Clark L.A., Tellegen A.: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scale. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 54, 1063–1070 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yu S.C., Chou C.: Does authentic happiness exist in cyberspace? Implications for understanding and guiding college students’ internet attitudes and behaviors. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 40(6), 1135–1138 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yu, S.C., Chou, C., Lin, Y.H., Wang, S.T. (2009). Positive psychology in virtual space: validating cyberspace pleasant-life scale. Paper Presented on Education and Development Conference 2009, Bangkok, Thailand. Mar 5–7, (2009)Google Scholar
  24. Yu S.C, Yu M.M.: Comparison of internet-based and paper-based questionnaires in Taiwan using multi-sample invariance approach. CyberPsychol. Behav. 10(4), 501–507 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yu, S.C., Lin, Y.H., Hsu, W.H. (2011) Applying structural equation modeling to report psychometric properties of Chinese version 10-item CES-D depression scale. Qual. Quant. doi: 10.1007/s11135-011-9604-0

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Counseling and Applied PsychologyNational Taichung University of EducationTaichungTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of EducationNational Chengchi UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations