Quality & Quantity

, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 2009–2024 | Cite as

Setting the course for quality assurance in higher education

  • Muhammad Asif
  • Abdul Raouf


While the application of quality management and total quality management in higher education (HE) are discussed in literature, quality assurance (QA) of academic programs—the main services offered by higher education institutes (HEIs)—is yet to be fully understood. Scepticism prevails on how the principles of QA—having origin in manufacturing sector—can be applied in HE. The main question addressed in this article is ‘how the academic processes can be designed for QA?’ This paper suggests the use of systems approach for a number of reasons: first systems approach brings wide range of stakeholders into organisational consciousness. Second, it allows deployment of QA strategically through the development of a mission for the HEI. Third, it allows alignment and realignment of academic processes with the mission of the HEI. Finally, it allows systematic management of QA implementation with an essential focus on continual improvement. The mentioned elements are embodied in a framework consisting of a list of diagnostic questions to guide the integration of QA into academic processes. The framework should help HEIs integrate QA into academic programs with continual improvement as an essential ingredient.


Quality assurance Higher education Academic programs Mission PDCA cycle 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ackoff R.L.: Systems thinking and thinking systems. Syst. Dynam. Rev. 10(2-3), 175–188 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asif M., de Bruijn E.J., Douglas A., Fisscher O.A.M.: Why quality management programs fail: a strategic and operations management perspective. Int. J. Qual. Reliabil. Manag. 26(08), 778–794 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aytac A., Deniz V.: Quality function deployment in education: a curriculum review. Qual. Quant. 39(4), 507–514 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bayraktar E., Tatoglu E., Zaim S.: An instrument for measuring the critical factors of TQM in Turkish higher education. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excel. 19(6), 551–574 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen S.H.: A performance matrix for strategies to improve satisfaction among faculty members in higher education. Qual. Quant. 45(1), 75–89 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen. S.H.: The establishment of a quality management system for the higher education industry. Qual. Quant., 1–18 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. Cheng Y.C., Tam W.M.: Multi-models of quality in education. Qual. Assur. Educat. 5(1), 22–31 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clayton M.: Towards total quality management in higher education at Aston University: a case study. High. Educat. 25(3), 363–371 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crosby P.B.: Quality is free. McGraw-Hill, New York (1979)Google Scholar
  10. Cruickshank M.: Total quality management in the higher education sector: a literature review from an international and Australian perspective. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excel. 14(10), 1159–1167 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daft R.L.: The new era of management. Thomson South-Western, Mason (2008)Google Scholar
  12. Dale B.G.: Managing quality. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford (2003)Google Scholar
  13. Deming W.E.: Out of the crisis. MIT Press, Cambridge (1986)Google Scholar
  14. Deming W.E.: The new economics for industry, government, education. 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1994)Google Scholar
  15. Galbraith P.L.: Systems thinking: a missing component in higher education planning?. Higher Education Policy 12(2), 141–157 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Helms M.M., Williams A.B., Nixon J.C.: TQM principles and their relevance to higher education: the question of tenure and post-tenure review. Int. J. Educat. Manag. 15(7), 322–331 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Houston D.: TQM and higher education: a critical systems perspective on fitness for purpose. Qual. High. Educat. 13(1), 3–17 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ISO: Quality management systems: fundamentals and vocabulary. In: International organization for standardization (ISO), Switzerland. (2005)Google Scholar
  19. Juran, J.M., Godfrey, A.B., Hoogstoel, R.E., Schilling, E.G. (eds): Juran’s quality handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  20. Karapetrovic S., Willborn W.: Creating zero-defect students. The TQM Mag. 9(4), 287–291 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Koch J.V., Fisher J.L.: Higher education and total quality management. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excel. 9(8), 659–668 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meirovich G., Romar E.J.: The difficulty in implementing TQM in higher education instuction - the dualtiy of instuctor/student roles. Qual. Assur. Educat 14(4), 324–337 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Wood D.J.: Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad. Manag. Rev. 22(04), 853–886 (1997)Google Scholar
  24. Owlia M.S., Aspinwall E.M.: TQM in higher education: a review. Int. J. Qual. Reliabil. Manag 14(5), 527–543 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Quinn A., Lemay G., Larsen P., Johnson D.M.: Service quality in higher education. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excel. 20(2), 139–152 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Raouf A.: Quality in higher education. Proc. Pak. Acad. Sci. 41(2), 165–174 (2004)Google Scholar
  27. Sirvanci M.B.: Critical issues for TQM implementation in higher education. The TQM Mag. 16(6), 382–386 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Srikanthan G., Dalrymple J.F.: Developing a holistic model for quality in higher education. Qual. High. Educat. 8(3), 215–224 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tribus M.: Total quality in schools of business and engineering. In: Roberts, H.V. (eds) Academic initiatives in total quality for higher education., ASQ quality press, Milwaukee, Wiskonsin (1995)Google Scholar
  30. Vazzana G.S., Winter J.K., Waner K.K.: Viewpoint: can TQM fill a gap in higher education?. J. Educat. Bus. 72(5), 313–316 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Venkatraman S.: A framework for implementing TQM in higher education programs. Qual. Assur. Educat. 15(1), 92–112 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weick K.E.: Sense-making in organizations. Sage Publications, California (1995)Google Scholar
  33. Williams R., Vander Wiele T., Iwaarden J.V., Bertsch B., Dale B.: Quality management: the new challenges. Total Qual. Manag. 17(10), 1273–1280 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Prince Sultan UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.University of the PunjabLahorePakistan
  3. 3.University of Management and TechnologyLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations