Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 829–854 | Cite as

Posting, quoting, and replying: a comparison of methodological approaches to measure communication ties in web forums

  • Andraž Petrovčič
  • Vasja Vehovar
  • Aleš Žiberna
Article

Abstract

Active involvement in discussion-based communities is nowadays a firm part of people’s online activities. The measurement of communication ties and networks between contributors to such domains is thus becoming a relevant research question in social sciences. However, especially in web forums, very often almost no direct relational information exists that would indicate the presence of communication ties among contributors. In contrast with the reply-to structure of Usenet newsgroup or mailing list conversations that contain explicit relational information created by the contributors, some web forums only enable participants to add new posts to threads or to quote preceding posts in threads. When discussions emerge, it is difficult to identify who is replying to whom. Drawing on the social network studies dealing with the conversational patterns in Usenet and web forums, this paper presents an alternative approach to identifying the ties between authors of posts. Several assumptions are discussed, and different measures are developed and empirically evaluated. The findings provide a starting point for the development of a standardized methodology for studying social networks in online communities where only limited direct information about communication ties is available.

Keywords

Measuring social networks Web forum Reply-to network Quotation network Communication ties Online community 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adamic, L.A., Glance, N.: The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, pp. 36–43. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  2. Adamic, L.A., Zhang, J., Bakshy, E., Ackerman, M.S.: Knowledge sharing and Yahoo answers: everyone knows something. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp.665–674. ACM, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  3. Arguello, J., Butler, B.S., Joyce, E., Kraut, R., Ling, K.S., Rosé, C., Wang, X.: Talk to me: foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2006, pp. 959–968. ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  4. Barcellini, F., Détienne, F., Burkhardt, J.-M., Sack, W.: Thematic coherence and quotation practices in OSS design-oriented online discussions. In: Proceedings of the 2005 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp. 177–186. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  5. Baym N.K.: Tune in, Log on: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2000)Google Scholar
  6. Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G.: Models of core/periphery structures. Soc. Netw. 21, 375–395 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borgatti S.P., Mehra A., Brass D.J., Labianca G.: Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323, 892–895 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brewer D.D.: Forgetting in the recall-based elicitation of personal and social networks. Soc. Netw. 22, 29–43 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Donath, J., Karahalios, K., Viegas, F.: Visualizing conversation. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 4. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/donath.html (1999). Accessed 25 May 2010
  10. Duck S.: Human Relationships. 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1998)Google Scholar
  11. Dutton W.H., Helsper E.J., Gerber M.M.: The Internet in Britain 2009. Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford (2009)Google Scholar
  12. Eklundh, K.S., Rodriguez, H.: Coherence and interactivity in text-based group discussions around web documents. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’04), p. 40108c. HICSS, Waikoloa (2004)Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, D., Smith, M.A., Welser, H.T.: You are who you talk to: detecting roles in Usenet newsgroups. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’06), p. 59b. HICSS, Waikoloa (2006)Google Scholar
  14. Garton, L., Haythornthwaite, C., Wellman, B.: Studying online social networks. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 3. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue1/garton.html (1997). Accessed 21 March 2010
  15. Gilbert, E., Karahalios, K.: Predicting tie strength with social media. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 211–220. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  16. Gleave, E., Welser, H.T., Lento, T.M., Smith, M.A.: A conceptual and operational definition of ‘social role’ in online community. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’09), pp. 1–11. HICSS, Waikoloa (2009)Google Scholar
  17. Gómez, V., Kaltenbrunner, A., López, V.: Statistical analysis of the social network and discussion threads in Slashdot. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 645–654. ACM, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  18. Gruzd, A.: Name networks: a content-based method for automated discovery of social networks to study collaborative learning. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE), Denver, CO, January 20–23, 2009. http://anatoliygruzd.com/pub/Gruzd_ALISE09_FullPaper.pdf (2009). Accessed 19 March 2010
  19. Haythornthwaite C.: Social network analysis: an approach and set of techniques for the study of information exchange. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 18, 323–342 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Herring, S.: Interactional coherence in CMC. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 4. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/herring.html (1999). Accessed 22 September 2009
  21. Himelboim I., Gleave E., Smith M.A.: Discussion catalysts in online political discussions: content importers and conversation starters. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 14, 771–789 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hlebec V., Lozar Manfreda K., Vehovar V.: The social support networks of internet users. New Media Soc. 8, 9–32 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Honeycutt, C., Herring, S.: Beyond microblogging: conversation and collaboration in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-42). IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2009)Google Scholar
  24. Horrigan, J.B.: A typology of information and communication technology users. PEW Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC. http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2007/PIP_ICT_Typology.pdf.pdf (2007). Accessed 22 April 2010
  25. Howison, J., Inoue, K., Crowston, K.: Social dynamics of free and open source team communications. In: Proceedings of the IFIP 2nd International Conference on Open Source Software. IFIP, Lake Como. http://floss.syr.edu/publications/howison_dynamic_sna_intoss_ifip_short.pdf (2006). Accessed 23 May 2007
  26. Joyce E., Kraut R.E.: Predicting continued participation in newsgroups. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 11, 723–747 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leskovec, J., Horwitz, E.: Planetary-scale views on a large instant-messaging network. In: Proceeding of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 915–924. ACM, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  28. Lewis K., Kaufman J., Gonzalez M., Wimmer A., Christakis N.: Tastes, ties, and time: a new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Soc. Netw. 30, 330–342 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lieberman M.A., Goldstein B.A.: Self-help on-line: an outcome evaluation of breast cancer bulletin boards. J. Health Psychol. 10, 855–862 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Muncer S., Loader B., Burrows R., Pleace N., Nettleton S.: Form and structure of newsgroups giving social support: a network approach. CyberPsychol. Behav. 3, 1017–1029 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Newman M.E.J.: Scientific collaboration networks: II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Phys. Rev. E 64(1), 016132 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Petroczi A., Nepusz T., Bazsó F.: Measuring tie-strength in virtual social networks. Connections 27, 49–57 (2006)Google Scholar
  33. Pustejovsky J.E., Spillane J.P.: Question-order effects in social network name generators. Soc. Netw. 31, 221–229 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sack W.: Conversation map: an interface for very-large-scale conversations. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 17, 73–92 (2000)Google Scholar
  35. Shi, X., Zhu, J., Cai, R., Zhang, L.: User grouping behaviour in online forums. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’09), pp. 777–786. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  36. Turner, T., Smith, M.A., Fisher, D., Welser, H.: Picturing Usenet: mapping computer-mediated collective action. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 10. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/turner.html (2005). Accessed 12 March 2010
  37. Vehovar V., Lozar Manfreda K., Koren G., Hlebec V.: Measuring ego-centered social networks on the web: questionnaire design issues. Soc. Netw. 30, 213–222 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vehovar V., Petrovčič A., Petrič G.: Prihod mobilnega telefona in analiza družbenih rab v Sloveniji. [Introduction of mobile phone and analysis of social uses in Slovenia]. In: Luthar, B., Oblak-Črnič, T. (eds) Mobilni telefon in transformacija vsakdana, pp. 177–208. Fakulteta za družbene vede, Ljubljana (2009)Google Scholar
  39. Welling L., Thompson L.: PHP and MySQL Web Development. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2003)Google Scholar
  40. Welser, H.T., Gleave, E., Barash, V., Smith, M., Meckes, J.: Whither the experts? Social affordances and the cultivation of experts in community Q&A systems. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Conference on Communities and Technologies, pp. 450–455. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  41. Whittaker, S., Terveen, L., Hill, W., Cherny, L.: The dynamics of mass interaction. In: Proceedings of the 1998 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’98), pp. 257–264. ACM, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  42. Xin, C., Glass, G., Feenberg, A., Liu, H., Gou, X.: Paper presented at the 13th UNESCO-APEID International Conference on Education and World Bank-KERIS High Level Seminar on ICT in Education, Hangzhou, China, 15–17 November. http://www.unescobkk.org/fileadmin/user_upload/apeid/Conference/13th_Conference/Papers/ (2009). Accessed 23 March 2010
  43. Zhongbao K., Changshui Z.: Reply networks on a bulletin board system. Phys. Rev. E 67, 0361171–0361176 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andraž Petrovčič
    • 1
  • Vasja Vehovar
    • 1
  • Aleš Žiberna
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations