Abstract
Conventionally adopted means-end chain (MEC) methodology uses product attributes, consequences and values to indicate consumption behavior hierarchies regarding specific products. These hierarchies are useful for elucidating consumer product knowledge and devise effective marketing strategies. In the MEC literature, the qualitative laddering scheme is the main approach used to identify the contents of consumer cognitive structures. However, MEC suffers limitations associated with the subjective research judgment. To overcome these weaknesses of MEC analysis, this work presents a novel laddering-matrix analysis (LMA) based on the quantitative matrix algorithm. The analytical results demonstrated that by integrating LMA and MEC it is possible to explore the information of the summary implication matrix without bias, thus providing extremely useful material for developing MEC computer software.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bourne H.B., Jenkins M.: Eliciting managers’ personal values: an adaptation of the laddering interview method. Organ. Res. Methods 8(4), 410–428 (2005)
Goldenberg M.A, Klenosky D.B., O’Leary J.T., Templin T.J.: A means-end investigation of ropes course experiences. J. Leis. Res. 32(2), 208–224 (2000)
Gutman J.: A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes. J. Mark. 46, 60–72 (1982)
Gutman J.: Means-end chains as goal hierarchies. J. Psychol. Market. 14(6), 545–560 (1997)
Herrmann A., Huber F., Braunstein C.: Market-driven product and service design: bridging the gap between customer needs, quality management, and customer satisfaction. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 66, 77–96 (2000)
Jacoby J., Chestnut R., Weigl K., Fisher W.: Pre-purchase information acquisition: description of a process methodology, research paradigm, and pilot investigation. Adv. Consum. Res. 3, 306–314 (1976)
Johnson F.C., Crudge S.E.: Using the repertory grid and laddering technique to determine the user’s evaluative model of search engines. J. Doc. 63(2), 259–280(22) (2007)
Kahle L.R., Kennedy P.: Using the list of values (LOV) to understand consumers. J. Serv. Mark. 2(4), 49–56 (1988)
Knoke D., Burt R.S.: Prominence. In: Burt, R.S., Minor, M.J. (eds) Applied Network Analysis, Sage, California (1983)
Kotler P.: Marketing Management, Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey (1997)
Lages L.F., Fernandes J.C.: The SERPVAL scale: A multi-item instrument for measuring service personal values. J. Bus. Res. 58, 1562–1572 (2005)
Lin C.F.: Quality-delivery system: a conceptual framework of attribute level-value linkages. Total. Qual. Manag. Bus. Excel. 14(10), 1079–1092 (2003)
Lin C.F., Wang H.F.: A decision-making process model of young online shoppers. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 11(6), 759–761 (2008)
Orsingher C., Marzocchi G.L.: Hierarchical representation of satisfactory consumer service experience. Int J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 14(2), 200–216 (2003)
Pieters R., Baumgartner H., Allen D.: A means-end chain approach to consumer goal structures. Int. J. Res. Mark. 12, 227–244 (1995)
Reynolds T.J., Gutman J.: Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation. J. Advert. Res. 28(1), 11–31 (1988)
Reynolds T.J., Olson J.C.: Understanding Consumer Decision Making: The Means-End Approach to Marketing and Advertising Strategy. New Jersey, Mahwah (2001)
Reynolds T.J., Phillips J.M.: A review and comparative analysis of laddering research methods: recommendations for quality metrics. Rev. Mark. Res. 5(Dec), 130–174 (2008)
Reynolds T.J., Whitlark D.B.: Applying laddering data to communications strategy and advertising practice. J. Advert. Res. 35, 9–17 (1995)
Rokeach M.J.: The Nature of Human Values. The Free Press, New York (1973)
ter Hofstede F., Audenaert A., Steenkamp J.B.E.M., Wedel M.: An investigation into the association pattern technique as a quantitative approach to measuring means-end chains. Int. J. Res. Mark. 15, 37–50 (1998)
Vriens M., ter Hofstede F.: Linking attributes, benefits, and consumer values. Mark. Res. 12(3), 5–10 (2000)
Wagner T.: Shopping motivation revised: a means-end chain analytical perspective. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 35(7), 569–582 (2007)
Woodside A.G.: Advancing means-end chains by incorporating Heider’s balance theory and Fournier’s consumer-brand relationship typology. Psychol. Market. 21(4), 279–294 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, WY., Fu, CS. Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods to enhance means-end approach. Qual Quant 45, 885–899 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9401-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9401-1