Use of dynamic programming to improve the detection of means-end chains from laddering data
- 95 Downloads
This article, based on the logic of means-end chain (MEC) technique and dynamic programming analysis, proposes a new structural MEC technique (SMT) for enhancing the functions of traditional MECs. The SMT can not only analyze significant consumers’ means-end hierarchies (namely consumers’ preferences of product characteristics) toward a particular product for deducing effective marketing strategies, but can also overcome the problems found in traditional MEC studies. The purposes of the SMT model are: (1) to avoid making the cutoff value decision by the investigators’ subjective judgment, (2) to analyze consumer product knowledge without constructing the hierarchical value map (HVM),(3) to evade the investigators’ cognition bias derived from the HVM to reveal consumer product knowledge, and (4) to confirm the accuracy of HVMs constructed by the laddering technique.
KeywordsDynamic programming Hierarchical value map Laddering technique Marketing strategy Means-end chain
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Doucette W.R., Wiederholt J.B.: Measuring product meaning for prescribed medication using a means-end chain model. J. Health Care Mark. 12(1), 48–54 (1992)Google Scholar
- Grunert K.G., Beckmann S.C., Sorensen E.: Means-end chains and laddering: an inventory of problems and an agenda for research. In: Reynolds, T.C., Olson, J.C. (eds) Understanding Consumer Decision-making: The Means-end Approach to Marketing and Advertising Strategy, pp. 63–90. Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ (2001)Google Scholar
- Hillier F.S., Lieberman G.J.: Introduction to Operations Research, pp. 430–433. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York (1995)Google Scholar
- Olson J.C., Reynolds T.J.: The means-end approach to understanding consumer decision making. In: Reynolds, T.C., Olson, J.C. (eds) Understanding Consumer Decision-making: The Means-end Approach to Marketing and Advertising Strategy, pp. 3–20. Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ (2001)Google Scholar
- Reynolds T.J., Gutman J.: Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation. J. Advert. Res. 28(1), 11–31 (1988)Google Scholar
- Reynolds T.J., Whitlark D.B.: Applying laddering data to communications strategy and advertising practice. J. Advert. Res. 35(4), 9–17 (1995)Google Scholar
- Rokeach M.: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values. Jossey Bass, San Francisco (1968)Google Scholar