Abstract
Face validity is a controversial kind of test validity. Personality tests are divided into two big categories: projective techniques and psychometric instruments. They differ also for face validity, which influences the perception that people have of tests themselves. The article reports the scientific debate on face validity, and the results of a study carried out on naive subjects in order to let them compare projective techniques and psychometric instruments on the mere basis of their surface. An ad hoc questionnaire was administered. It asked subjects to compare projective techniques and psychometric instruments by using 13 adjectives. The sample, accidental, is composed of 238 participants, 45 males and 193 females. The data were substantially analyzed through techniques of Correspondence Analysis. Personality tests are principally judged through two dimensions: the aesthetic and the efficacy. The first dimension characterizes in particular projective techniques; the second, psychometric instruments. Although participants acknowledge that psychometric instruments are credible and scientific, there is a clear preference for projective techniques, principally by females, people younger than 22 and participants with lower education. Personality tests have an appearance that is judged by those who look at them. The aesthetic seems to prevail on the efficacy perception, but it would be suitable to carry on the same research with a sample stratified in respect of the personal details measured by the questionnaire.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alderson J.C., Clapham C., Wall D.: Language Test Construction and Evaluation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)
Allen M., Yen W.M.: Introduction to Measurement Theory. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA (1979)
Anastasi A.: Psychological Testing. Macmillan, New York, NY (1988)
Anastasi A., Urbina S.: Psychological testing, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (1997)
Borsboom D., Mellenbergh G.J., van Heerden J.: The concept of validity. Psychol. Rev. 111(4), 1061–1071 (2004)
Buck, G.: Validities. Message posted on L-TESL. Online Forum. http://f05n16.cac.psu.edu/archives/ltest-l.html
Carroll B.J.: Second language performance testing for university and professional contexts. In: Hauptman, P.C., LeBlanc, R., Wesche, M.B. (eds) Second Language Performance Testing, University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa (1985)
Cattell R.B.: Description and Measurement of Personality. World Book Company, New York (1946)
Cattell R.B., Warburton F.W.: Objective Personality and Motivation Tests. University of Illinois Press, Urbana (1967)
Cornoldi C., Tressoldi P.: Sulla scientificità delle tecniche proiettive: a proposito degli interventi apparsi su “Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo”. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia 2, 237–244 (2005)
Cronbach L.J.: Validity. In: Thorndike, R.L. (eds) Educational Measurement, 2nd edn, pp. 443–597. American Council on Education, Washington, DC (1971)
Cronbach L.J.: Essentials of Psychological Testing. Harper and Row, New York (1984)
Cronbach L.J., Meehl P.E.: Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol. Bull. 52, 281–302 (1955)
Davies A., Brown A., Elder C.: Dictionary of Language Testing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
Fink A.: How to Ask Survey Questions. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (1995)
Hajipournezhad, G.: An Approach to the Validation of Judgments in Language Testing. http://www.jalt.org/pansig/2003/HTML/HajiPourNezhad.htm (2003)
Ingram E.: Basic concepts in testing. In: Allen, J.P.B., Davies, A. (eds) Testing and Experimental Methods, Oxford University Press, London (1977)
Kelley T.L.: Interpretation of Educational Measurement. Macmillian, New York (1927)
Kline P.: The Handbook of Psychological Testing. Routledge, London (1993)
Kline P.: The New Psychometrics. Routledge, London (1998)
Lacity M., Jansen M.A.: Understanding qualitative data: A framework of text analysis methods. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 11, 137–166 (1994)
Messick S.: Test validity and the ethics of measurement. Am. Psychol. 30, 955–966 (1980)
Messick S.: Validity. In: Linn, R.L. Educational Measurement, 2nd edn, pp. 13–104. American Council on Education and Oryx Press, Phoenix, AZ (1993)
Messick S.: Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. Am. Psychol. 50, 741–749 (1995)
Messick S.: Test validity: A matter of consequence. Soc. Indic. Res. 45, 35–44 (1998)
Mosier C.I.: A critical examination of the concepts of face validity. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 7, 191–205 (1947)
Nevo B.: Face validity revisited. J. Educ. Meas. 22, 287–293 (1985)
Newfields, T.: Challenging the notion of face validity. SHIKEN: JALT Test. Eval. SIG Newsl. 6(3), 19. http://www.jalt.org/test/new_2.htm (2002)
Pedrabissi L., Santinello M.: I test psicologici. Il Mulino, Bologna (1997)
Roberts, D.M.: Face validity: Is there a place for this in measurement? SHIKEN: JALT Test. Eval. SIG Newsl. 4(2), 5. http://www.jalt.org/test/rob_1.htm (2000)
Sartori R.: La valutazione della personalità tramite test. Quaderni Dipav 6, 159–178 (2003)
Sartori R., Bortolani E.: Approccio idiografico e approccio nomotetico alla persona: il caso dei test dei psicologici. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia 1, 107–118 (2006)
Sartori R., Pasini M.: Quality and quantity in test validity: How can we be sure that psychological tests measure what they have to. Qual. Quant. 41(3), 359–374 (2007)
Trochim, W.: Measurement validity types. http://trochim.omni.cornell.edu/kb/ (2002). Accessed 17 Apr 2002
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sartori, R. Face validity in personality tests: psychometric instruments and projective techniques in comparison. Qual Quant 44, 749–759 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9224-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9224-0