Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 573–581 | Cite as

Efficiency and total factor productivity of crop production at NUTS1 level in Turkey: Malmquist index approach

  • Goksel Armagan
  • Altug Ozden
  • Selim Bekcioglu
Research Note

Abstract

Fundamental components of the economy in developing countries are efficiency and productivity. These concepts prevail all around the world and many studies have been conducted on the issue. With the rapidly increasing population, productivity and efficiency of the agricultural sector have become even more important in order to meet the food needs of the population. In this study, NUTS (The Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics) regions in Turkey were accepted as an decision making unit and the efficiency values of these regions, changes in the total factor productivity and technology were calculated for the 10-year period covering 1994–2003. Methods of Data Envelopment Analysis and Malmquist Productivity Index were used in order to measure the crop production of NUTS1 regions in Turkey. There has been a decrease in the technical efficiency and total factor productivity in the regions, excluding the Western Marmara, the Aegean, the Mediterranean and The Eastern Blacksea Region, within the 10 year period analyzed. The decrease reflected all over the country. The decrease was caused by the fact that the real price level remained the same; the real prices of the inputs increased despite the decreasing population economically active in the agricultural sector, and the difficulty experienced in integration of the latest technology to the agricultural sector. Regional differences in terms of productivity and efficiency is another striking finding.

Keywords

Agriculture TFP Change DEA Turkey 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anonymous: Official Journal of the Turkish Republic, Decree No: 4720, 28/08/2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous: Official Journal of the European Union, L 154, 21/06/2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. Aldaz, N., Millan, J.A.: A comparison of agricultural productivity in the European Union regions, ERSA (2003)Google Scholar
  4. Bezemer, D., Headey, D.: Something of a Paradox: The Curious Neglect of Agriculture in Development, Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA), Working Paper Series, No:01/2006, Australia (2006)Google Scholar
  5. Charnes A., Cooper W., Rhodes E.: Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2, 429–444 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coelli, T.: A guide to DEAP Version 2.1, Data Envelopment Analysis Computer Program, CEPA Working Paper 96/08. University of New England (1996)Google Scholar
  7. Coelli, T.J., Rao, D.S.P.: A Cross-Country Analysis of GDP Growth, Catch-up and Convergence in Productivity and Inequality, Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA), Working Paper Series, No:05/1998, Australia (1998)Google Scholar
  8. Coelli, T.J., Rao, D.S.P.: Total Factor Productivity Growth in Agriculture: A Malmquist Index Analysis of 93 Countries 1980–2000, Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA), Working Paper Series, No:02/2003, Australia (2003)Google Scholar
  9. Coelli T.J., Rao D.S.P., Battese G.E.: An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1998)Google Scholar
  10. Fare R., Shawna G., Mary N., Zhongyang Z.: Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am. Econ. Rev. 84, 66–80 (1994)Google Scholar
  11. Farrell M.J.: The measurement of productive efficiency. J. R. Stat. Soc. 120, 253–281 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kong X., Marks R.E., Wan G.H.: Technical efficiency, technological chance and total factor productivity growth in Chinese state-owned enterprises during early 1990’s. Asian Econ. J. 13(3), 267–282 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mahadevan R.: A DEA approach to understanding the productivity growth Malaysia’s manufacturing industries. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 19, 587–600 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mathijs E., Blaas G., Doucha T.: Organisational form and technical efficiency Of Czech And Slovak Farms. MOCT-MOST Econ. Policy Transitional Econ. 9(3), 331–344 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Turkstat: Turkish Statistical Yearbook, State Institute of Statistics, Prime Ministry Republic of Turkey (Various Years) (1994–2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of AgricultureAdnan Menderes UniversityAydinTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative SciencesAdnan Menderes UniversityAydinTurkey

Personalised recommendations