Advertisement

Quality and Quantity

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 351–380 | Cite as

Integrated environmental assessment of the location selection with fuzzy analytical network process

  • Cheng-Ru Wu
  • Chin-Tsai Lin
  • Huang-Chu Chen
Original Paper

Abstract

Owing to the complexity of a construction project, the fuzzy ANP is helpful to deal with interdependent relationships within a multi-criteria decision-making model. This paper uses the Porter’s diamond model that influences how competitive advantages, which is a matrix providing a conceptual model for the main framework, as a construct for selecting the location of a regional hospital in Taiwan to determine its effectiveness. The applicability of our proposed fuzzy ANP model is demonstrated with a case study that summarizes an intervention in which the model’s framework and basic concepts were applied.

Keywords

Fuzzy ANP Diamond model Selection of location 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson D.R., Sweeney D.J. and Williams T.A. (2001). Quantitative Methods for Business. South-Western College, Cincinnati Google Scholar
  2. Bell J. (1997). Think strategically. Distribution 96: 30–31 Google Scholar
  3. Chapman K. and Walker D.F. (1991). Industrial Location. Blackwell, New York Google Scholar
  4. Chang H., Chang W.J., Das S. and Li S.H. (2004). Health care regulation and the operating efficiency of hospital: Evidence from Taiwan. J. Account. Public Pol. 23(6): 483–510 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Current J., Min H. and Schilling D. (1990). Multiobjectine analysis of factility location decision. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 49: 295–307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Delbecq A.L., Gustafson D.H. and van de Ven A.H. (1975). Group Techniques For Program Planning: A Guide To Nominal Group and Delphi Processes. Scott, Foresman and Company, Illinois Google Scholar
  7. Department of Health, Executive Yuan, Taiwan (2005) Health and national health insurance annual statistic information service. http://www.doh.gov.tw/statistic/index.htmGoogle Scholar
  8. Gold S. (1991). A new approach to site selection. Distribution 90: 29–33 Google Scholar
  9. Goldstein S.M., Ward P.T., Leong G.K. and Butler T.W. (2002). The effect of location, strategy, and operations technology on hospital performance. J. Oper. Manage. 20(1): 63–75 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gourley C. (1997). Supply and demand: staples puts pen to paper and centralizes its DC. Distribution 6(1): 60–62 Google Scholar
  11. Grinnell J. (1904). Midwinter birds at palm spring. Condor 6: 40–45 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hsiao C.L., Yang C.L. and Lu J.F. (1990). Health-care financing and delivery in the ROC: current conditions and future challenges. Ind. Free China 73(2): 1–19 Google Scholar
  13. Hsu T.H. and Yang T.H. (2000). Application of fuzzy analytic hierarch process in the selection of advertising media. J Manage. Syst. Taiwan, 7(1): 19–39 Google Scholar
  14. Hudson T. (1995). Rural priorities. Hosp. Health Netw. 69(4): 40–44 Google Scholar
  15. Kahraman G., Ertay T. and Buyukozkan G. (2006). A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network process approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 171: 390–411 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kiran K. and John R.L. (2005). Location strategies of broad-line retailers: An empirical investigation. J. Business Res. 58: 687–695 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lamont B.T., Marlin D. and Hoffman J.J. (1993). Porter’s generic strategies, discontinuous environments, and performance: a longitudinal study of changing strategies in the hospital industry. Health Services Res. 28(5): 623–640 Google Scholar
  18. Lin C.T. and Wu C.R. (2003). Batch process and transfer decisions in foreign market: a real options model. Appl. Stoch. Models Business Ind. 19(2): 121–131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lin C.T. and Wu C.R. (2004). Decision for the optimal location-waiting timing relationship in a real options model. Ann. Econ. Finance 5(2): 271–282 Google Scholar
  20. Liou T.S. and Wang M.J.J. (1992). Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 50: 247–55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Longo D.R., Sohn M. and Shortell S.M. (1996). The etiology and determinants of hospital closure. J. Heath Care Finance 22(3): 34–48 Google Scholar
  22. Meade L.M. and Sarkis J. (1998). Strategic analysis of logistics and supply chain management systems using the analytic network process. Trans. Res. Part E: Log. Trans. Rev. 34(3): 201–215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meade L.M. and Sarkis J. (1999). Analyzing organizational project alternatives for agile manufacturing processes—an analytical network approach. Int. J. Prod. Res. 37(2): 241–261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mohanty R.P., Agarwal R., Choudhury A.K. and Tiwari M.K. (2005). A fuzzy ANP-based approach to R&D project selection: a case study. Int. J. Prod. Res. 43(24): 5199–5216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Murry J.W. and Hammons J.O. (1995). Delphi: a versatile methodology for conducting qualitative Research. Rev. Higher Educ. 18(4): 423–436 Google Scholar
  26. Nath D. and Sudharshan D. (1994). Measuring strategy coherence through patterns of strategic choices. Strat. Manage. J. 15(1): 43–51 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Porter M.E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press, New York Google Scholar
  28. Robbins S.P. (1994). Management. Prentice Hall, New Jersey Google Scholar
  29. Robinson J.C. and Luft H.S. (1985). The impact of hospital market structure on patient volume, average length of stay and the cost of care. J. Health Econ. 4(4): 293–391 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ross G.T.J. and Soland R.M. (1980). A multicriteria approach to the location of public facilities. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 4: 307–321 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roth F.B., Acker M.S., Roemer M.I. and Myers G.W. (1955). Some factors influencing hospital utilization in Saskatchewan. Can. J. Public Health 46: 303–323 Google Scholar
  32. Saaty T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY Google Scholar
  33. Saaty T.L. (1994). Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 74: 426–447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saaty T.L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh Google Scholar
  35. Saaty T.L. (1999). Fundamentals of the Analytic Network Process. ISAHP, Kobe, Japan Google Scholar
  36. Saaty T.L. (2000). Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process AHP Series VI,  . RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 1–478 Google Scholar
  37. Sarkis J. (2003). Quantitative models for performance measurement systems-alternate considerations. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 86: 81–90 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sung W.C. (2001). Application of Delphi method, a qualitative and quantitative analysis, to the healthcare management. J. Healthcare Manage. 2(2): 11–19 Google Scholar
  39. Swamidass P.M. and Newell W.T. (1987). Manufacturing strategy, environmental uncertainty and performance: A path analytic model. Manage. Sci. 33(4): 509–524 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ward P.T., Duray R., Leong G.K. and Sum C. (1995). Business environment, operations strategy, and performance: Empirical study of Singapore manufacturers. J. Oper. Manage. 13(2): 99–115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weber A. (1909). Theory of the Location of Industries. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago Google Scholar
  42. Wu C.R. and Lin C.T. (2004). The choice of foreign production strategy and timing of decision among three countries under exchange rate uncertainty. Asia-Pacific. J. Oper. Res. 21(4): 499–516 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wu C.R. and Lin C.T. (2007). Optimal location among N-countries under exchange rate uncertainty: applying real options. Asia-Pacific J. Oper. Res. 24(1): 12–44 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wu, C.R., Chang, C.W., Lin, H.L.: FAHP sensitivity analysis for measurement nonprofit organizational performance. Qual. Quant (2006) doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9046-2Google Scholar
  45. Zadeh L. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8: 338–353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of FinanceYuanpei UniversityHsin ChuTaiwan, ROC
  2. 2.Graduate Institute of Business and ManagementYuanpei University of Science and TechnologyHsin ChuTaiwan, ROC
  3. 3.Department of Business AdministrationNational Dong Hwa UniversityHualienTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations