Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conjunctural causation in comparative case-oriented research

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article highlights one of the major benefits of qualitative comparative methodology as applied within a “small-N” research design, namely its potential use for specifying the scope conditions of (theoretically competing) causal mechanisms. It is argued that the identification of set-theoretic relationships, multiple paths, and analytic efforts in typological mapping can make valuable contributions to the elaboration and further development of middle-range theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott A.: Time Matters. On Theory and Method. University of Chicago Press (2001).

  • Aickin M. (2004). Millsian causation. Qual. Quant. 38: 533–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison G.T. and Zelikow P. (1999). Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, 2nd ed. Longman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, S.S.: “On a clear day you can see the EU”—Case Study Methodology in EU Research. ARENA—Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo, Working Paper No. 16/2003, (2003)

  • Aus J.P.: Logics of Decision-Making on Community Asylum Policy. A Case Study of the Evolvement of the Dublin II Regulation. ARENA—Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo, Working Paper No. 03/2006 (2006a)

  • Aus J.P.: Eurodac: A Solution Looking for a Problem? ARENA—Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo. Working Paper No. 09/2006 (2006b)

  • Becker H.S.: Cases, causes, conjunctures, stories, and imagery. In: Ragin C. C., Becker H. S. (eds.) What is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry, pp. 205–216. Cambridge University Press (1992)

  • Bennett A. and George A.L. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. The MIT Press, Cambridge and Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Braumoeller B.F. (2003). Causal complexity and the study of politics. Political Analysis 11: 209–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge M. (2004). How does it work? The search for explanatory mechanisms. Philos. Soc. Sci. 34: 182–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan S. (2003). Explaining war termination: A Boolean analysis of causes. J. Peace Res. 40: 49–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkel J.T. and Moravcsik A. (2001). A constructivist research programme in EU Studies?. Euro. Union Politics 2: 219–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, J.T.: Social mechanisms and the quality of cooperation: Are Europe and the EU really that different? ARENA—Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo. Working Paper No. 8/ 2004 (2004)

  • (2000a). Council Regulation (EC) No 2725/2000 of 11 December 2000 concerning the establishment of “Eurodac” for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention. Official J. Euro. Commun. L 316: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • (2000b). Council decision of 28 September 2000 establishing a European Refugee Fund (2000/596/EC). Official J. Euro. Commun. L 252: 12–18

    Google Scholar 

  • (2003). Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national. Official J. Euro. Union L 50: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein H. (1975). Case study and theory in political science. In: Greenstein, F.I. and Polsby, N.W. (eds) Strategies of Inquiry Handbook of Political Science, vol. 7, pp 97–137. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster J. (1983). Explaining technical change. Norwegian University Press, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J.: A plea for mechanisms. In: Hedstrøm, P., Swedberg, R. (eds.) Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, pp. 45–73. Cambridge University Press, (1998)

  • Etzioni A. (2000). Social norms: Internalization, persuasion and history. Law Soc. Rev. 34: 157–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Selected Essays by Clifford Geertz. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser B.G. and Strauss A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. de Gruyter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I.: Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge University Press (1983)

  • Halmos P.R. (1960). Naive Set Theory. van Nostrand, Princeton NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Jupille J., Caporaso J.A. and Checkel J.T. (2003). Integrating institutions: Rationalism, constructivism, and the study of the European Union. Comp. Polit. Stud. 36: 7–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, G., Keohane, R.O., Verba, S.: Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press (1994)

  • Lewis J. (2003). Informal integration and the supranational construction of the council. J. Euro. Publ. Policy 10: 996–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberson, S.: Small N’s and big conclusions: An examination of the reasoning in comparative studies based on a small number of cases. In: Ragin, C.C., Becker H. S. (eds.) What is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry, pp. 105–118. Cambridge University Press (1992)

  • Lijphart A. (1971). Comparative politics and the comparative method. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 65: 682–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney J. (2000). Strategies of causal inference in small-N analysis. Sociol. Methods Res. 28: 387–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March J.G. and Olsen J.P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions. The Organizational Basis of Politics. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • March J.G. and Olsen J.P. (1995). Democratic Governance. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., Olsen, J.P.: The logic of appropriateness. In: Moran, M., Rein, M., Goodin, R.E. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. pp. 689–708. Oxford University Press (2006)

  • Marini M.M. and Singer B. (1988). Causality in the social sciences. Sociol. Methodol. 18: 347–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattila M. (2004). Contested decisions: Empirical analysis of voting in the European Union Council of Ministers. Euro. J. Polit. Res. 43: 29–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz R. (2004). Mechanisms in the analysis of social macro-phenomena. Philos. Soc. Sci. 34: 237–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeown T.J. (1999). Case studies and the statistical worldview: review of King, Keohane and Verba’s “Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research”. Int. Org. 53: 161–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton R.K. (1949). Social Theory and Social Structure. Free Press, Glencose, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill J.S. (1868). A System of Logic – Ratiocinative and Inductive. Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation, vol. I. Longmans, Green, Reader & Dyer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mjøset L. (2000). Stein Rokkan’s thick comparisons. Acta Sociol. 43: 381–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mjøset, L.: Theory: conceptions in the social sciences. In: Smelser N.J., Bates P.B. (eds.) The International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, pp. 15641–15647. Elsevier Science Ltd. (2001)

  • Moore B. (1967). Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy—Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Penguin Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsome G.L. (2003). The debate between current versions of covariation and mechanism approaches to causal inference. Philos. Psychol. 16: 87–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nissen S. (1998). The case of case studies: on the methodological discussion in comparative political science. Qual. Quant. 32: 399–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen J.P. (2002). The many faces of europeanization. J. Common Market Stud. 40: 921–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennings P. (2005). The diversity and causality of welfare state reforms explored with fuzzy-sets. Qual. Quant. 39: 317–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin C.C. (1987). The Comparative Method. Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin C.C. (1999). Using qualitative comparative analysis to study causal complexity. Health Serv. Res. 34: 1225–1239

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C.: Fuzzy-Set Social Science. University of Chicago Press (2000)

  • Rokkan, S.: State Formation, Nation-Building, and Mass Politics in Europe: The Theory of Stein Rokkan. In: Flora, P., Kuhnle, S., Urwin, D. Oxford University Press (1999)

  • Scharpf F. W. (2000). Institutions in comparative policy research. Comp. Polit. Stud. 33: 762–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F.: The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe. Rules and Rhetoric. Cambridge University Press (2003a)

  • Schimmelfennig F. (2003b). Strategic action in a community environment: the decision to enlarge the European Union to the East. Comp. Polit. Stud. 36: 156–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigelman L. and Gadbois G.H. (1983). Contemporary comparative politics. An inventory and assessment. Comp. Polit. Stud. 16: 275–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T.: States and Social Revolutions. A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge University Press (1979)

  • Skocpol T. and Somers M. (1980). The uses of comparative history in macrosocial inquiry. Comp. Stud. Soc. History 22: 174–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel D. (2004). Social mechanisms and causal inference. Philos. Soc. Sci. 34: 55–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thielemann E.R. (2003). Between interests and norms: explaining burden-sharing in the European Union. J. Refugee Stud. 16: 253–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varone F., Rothmayr C. and Montpetit E. (2006). Regulating biomedicine in Europe and North America: A qualitative comparative analysis. Euro. J. Polit. Res. 45: 317–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verschuren P.J. (2001). Holism versus reductionism in modern social science research. Qual. Quant. 35: 389–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker H.A. and Cohen B.P. (1985). Scope statements: imperatives for evaluating theory. Am. Sociol. Rev. 50: 288–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M.: Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, vol. 1. In: Roth, G. Wittich C, University of California Press, Berkeley (1978)

  • White P.A. (2000). Causal attribution and Mill’s methods of experimental inquiry: past, present and prospect. Brit. J. Soc. Psychol. 39: 429–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuern M. and Checkel J.T. (2005). Getting socialized to build bridges: Constructivism and rationalism, Europe and the nation-state. Int. Org. 59: 1045–1079

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ARENA—Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1143, Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway

    Jonathan P. Aus

Authors
  1. Jonathan P. Aus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan P. Aus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aus, J.P. Conjunctural causation in comparative case-oriented research. Qual Quant 43, 173–183 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9104-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9104-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation