Fuzzy Decision Making for Market Positioning and Developing Strategy for Improving Service Quality in Department Stores
- 309 Downloads
Conventionally designed questionnaires frequently use the Likert Scale to gauge the feeling of respondents. The dichotomy and the same interval integer are clear-cut. Owing to the fuzziness of human thinking, this approach is inadequate and too simple to rule subject’s way and measure complex human thinking and cognition. Consequently, this investigation integrated the five dimensions of SERVQUAL and adopted a Fuzzy set theory based approach. The five criteria of SERVQUAL were tested for four department stores using Fuzzy set theory to clarify the positioning of service quality in the department store market and propose implementation priorities for different service strategies. This result permits managers to collate the service strategy of the benchmarking department store and its local competitors, and also enables department store decision-makers to consider the weights of the five dimensions when modifying the service strategy. The analytical results can be used to improve strategy development, and to devise superior and more effective management methods.
KeywordsAHP fuzzy set theory service quality market position SERVQUAL
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cronin, J. J. Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: a reexamination and Journal of Marketing 56(July): 55–68.Google Scholar
- Cronin, J. J. Taylor, S. A. (1994). SERVPERF Versus SERVQUAL: reconciling and perceptions-minus-expectations measurement of service quality. Journal of Marketing 58(January): 125–131Google Scholar
- Dubois D., Prade H. (1978). Operations on fuzzy number. International Journal of Science 9(6): 13–626Google Scholar
- Hwang C.L. Yoon K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Berlin, SpringerGoogle Scholar
- Lin, Shu-Chen, Liang G.-S., Ye K.-D. (2005). A survey investigation of airports as centers: a strategic advantage perspective. International Journal of Managemaet 22(3): 396–414Google Scholar
- Prascevic, Z. Petrovic-Lazarevic, S. (1998). Fuzzy multiple objective decision making in the construction industry. Monash University, Department of Management, working paper, pp. 90–98.Google Scholar
- Parasuraman A., Zeithamal V.A., Berry L. (1988). SERVQUAL: a multiple scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing 64: 12–40Google Scholar
- Parasuraman, A., Zeithamal, V.A. Berry, L. (1990). An empirical test of the extended gaps model of service quality. Marketing Science Institute Working paper, pp. 90–122.Google Scholar
- Parikh D. (2005). Measuring retail service quality: an empirical study in a developing country. South Asian Journal of Management 12(2): 43–57Google Scholar
- Saaty T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, 9th edn. New York, McGraw HillGoogle Scholar
- Shee D.Y., Tzeng G.-H., Tang T.-I. (2003). AHP, fuzzy measure and fuzzy approaches for the appraisal of information service providers in Taiwan. Journal of Global Information Technology Management 6(1): 8–30Google Scholar