Abstract
In causal analysis, path models are an appropriate tool for studying relationships between social phenomena. However, they assume linear linkages between variables, and hence they are not always suitable for describing the complexity and richness of relationships in social phenomena. The aim of this work is to propose an exploratory graphical method to evaluate if the phenomena under analysis are actually characterized by non-linear linkages. In particular, the method is well suited to discovering interactions between the observed variables in path models. The proposed approach, which does not depend on any hypothesis on the error distribution, is based on a series of plots that can be easily interpreted and drawn using standard statistical software. As an additional feature, the plots – which we call joint effect plots – support qualitative interpretation of the non-linear linkages after the path model has been specified. Finally, the proposed method is applied within a case study. Non-linearities are explored in a casual model aiming to find the determinants of remittances of a group of Tunisian migrants in Italy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiken L.S., West S.G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage publication, California
Alwin D.F., Hauser R.M. (1975). The decomposition of effects in path analysis. Sociological Review 40: 36–47
Arjas E. (2001). Causal analysis and statistics: A social sciences perspective. Sociological Review 17: 59–64
Blalock H.M. Jr. (1964). Causal Inference in Nonexperimental Research. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill
Blalock H.M. Jr. (1971). Causal Models in the Social Sciences. Aldine Company, New York
Bollen K.A. (1989). Structural Equation with Latent Variables. John Wiley, New York
Brown R.P.C. (1997). Estimating remittances functions for pacific islands migrants. World Development 25: 613–626
Busemeyer J.R., Jones L.E. (1983). Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error. Quantitative Methods in Psychology 93: 549–562
Cleveland W.S. (1993). Visualizing Data. AT & T Bell Laboratoires Murray Hill, New Jersey
Cook R.D. (1998). Regression Graphics. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Cook R.D., Weisberg S. (1989). Regression diagnostics with dynamic graphics. Technometrics 31: 277–291
Cook R.D., Weisberg S. (1999). Applied Regression Including Computing and Graphics. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Funkhouser E. (1995). Remittances from international migration: A comparison of El and Nicaragua. The Review of Economics and Statistics 77: 137–146
Grapentine T. (2000). Path analysis versus structural equation modelling. Marketing Research 12: 12–21
Gujarati D.N. (1995). Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill, New York
Heckman D. (1979). Sample selection bias as specification bias. Econometrica 47: 153–161
Hodson R. (2004). Organizational trustworthiness: Findings from the population of organizational ethnographies. Science 15: 432–445
Holland P.W. (1988). Causal inference, path analysis and recursive structural equations models. In: Clogg C. (eds)Sociological Methodology. American Sociological Association, Washington, DC
Israel A.Z. (1987). Path analysis for mixed qualitative and quantitative variables. Quality & Quantity 21: 91–102
Jaccard J., Wan C. K. (1995). Measurement error in the analysis of interaction effects between continuous predictors using multiple regression: Multiple indicator and structural equation approaches. Psychological Bulletin 117: 348–357
Jaccard J., Turrisi R., Wan C.K. (1990). Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Sage publication, California
Jöreskog K.G. (1970). A general method for analysis of covariance structures. Biometrika 57: 239–251
Kline R.B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press, New York
Lance C.E. (1988). Residual centering, esploratory and confirmatory moderator analysis, and decomposition of effects in path models containing interactions. Applied Psychological Measurement 12: 163–175
Land K.C. (1969). Principles of path analysis. In: E. F. Borgatta (ed.), Sociological Methodology. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
McClendon M.J. (1994). Multiple Regression and Causal Analysis. F. E. Peacock Publishers, Illinois
Nishina K. (2001). Application of statistical causal analysis to process analysis. In: Lenz H.J., Wilrich P.T. (eds) Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg
Pindyck R.S., Rubinfeld D.L. (1981). Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. McGraw-Hill International Editions, London
Ritschard G., Kellerhals J., Olszak M., Sardi M. (1996). Path analysis with partial association measures. Quality & Quantity 30: 37–60
Stanghellini E., Wermuth N. (2005). On the identification of path analysis models with one hidden variable. Biometrika 92: 337–350
Tan W.Y. (1982). Sampling distributions and Robustness of t, F and Variance-Ratio in two sample and ANOVA models with respect to departure from normality. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 11: 2485–2511
Tukey, J. W. (1964). Causation, regression and path analysis. In: Statistics and Mathematics in Biology. New York: Hafner Publishing Company.
Winship C., Mare R.D. (1983). Structural equations and path analysis for discrete data. American Journal of Sociology 89: 54–110
Wright S. (1921). Correlation and causation. Journal of Agricultural Research 20: 557–585
Yamauchi F. (2004). Are experience and schooling complementary? Evidence from migrants’ assimilation in the Bangkok labor market. Journal of Development Economics 74: 489–513
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Porzio, G.C., Vitale, M.P. Exploring Nonlinearities in Path Models. Qual Quant 41, 937–954 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9022-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9022-x