Quality & Quantity

, 41:937 | Cite as

Exploring Nonlinearities in Path Models

Article
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

In causal analysis, path models are an appropriate tool for studying relationships between social phenomena. However, they assume linear linkages between variables, and hence they are not always suitable for describing the complexity and richness of relationships in social phenomena. The aim of this work is to propose an exploratory graphical method to evaluate if the phenomena under analysis are actually characterized by non-linear linkages. In particular, the method is well suited to discovering interactions between the observed variables in path models. The proposed approach, which does not depend on any hypothesis on the error distribution, is based on a series of plots that can be easily interpreted and drawn using standard statistical software. As an additional feature, the plots – which we call joint effect plots – support qualitative interpretation of the non-linear linkages after the path model has been specified. Finally, the proposed method is applied within a case study. Non-linearities are explored in a casual model aiming to find the determinants of remittances of a group of Tunisian migrants in Italy.

Keywords

causal analysis diagnostics graphical methods interactions joint effect plot migrant’s remittances 

References

  1. Aiken L.S., West S.G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage publication, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  2. Alwin D.F., Hauser R.M. (1975). The decomposition of effects in path analysis. Sociological Review 40: 36–47Google Scholar
  3. Arjas E. (2001). Causal analysis and statistics: A social sciences perspective. Sociological Review 17: 59–64Google Scholar
  4. Blalock H.M. Jr. (1964). Causal Inference in Nonexperimental Research. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  5. Blalock H.M. Jr. (1971). Causal Models in the Social Sciences. Aldine Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Bollen K.A. (1989). Structural Equation with Latent Variables. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown R.P.C. (1997). Estimating remittances functions for pacific islands migrants. World Development 25: 613–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Busemeyer J.R., Jones L.E. (1983). Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error. Quantitative Methods in Psychology 93: 549–562Google Scholar
  9. Cleveland W.S. (1993). Visualizing Data. AT & T Bell Laboratoires Murray Hill, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  10. Cook R.D. (1998). Regression Graphics. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Cook R.D., Weisberg S. (1989). Regression diagnostics with dynamic graphics. Technometrics 31: 277–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cook R.D., Weisberg S. (1999). Applied Regression Including Computing and Graphics. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Funkhouser E. (1995). Remittances from international migration: A comparison of El and Nicaragua. The Review of Economics and Statistics 77: 137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grapentine T. (2000). Path analysis versus structural equation modelling. Marketing Research 12: 12–21Google Scholar
  15. Gujarati D.N. (1995). Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Heckman D. (1979). Sample selection bias as specification bias. Econometrica 47: 153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hodson R. (2004). Organizational trustworthiness: Findings from the population of organizational ethnographies. Science 15: 432–445Google Scholar
  18. Holland P.W. (1988). Causal inference, path analysis and recursive structural equations models. In: Clogg C. (eds)Sociological Methodology. American Sociological Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  19. Israel A.Z. (1987). Path analysis for mixed qualitative and quantitative variables. Quality & Quantity 21: 91–102Google Scholar
  20. Jaccard J., Wan C. K. (1995). Measurement error in the analysis of interaction effects between continuous predictors using multiple regression: Multiple indicator and structural equation approaches. Psychological Bulletin 117: 348–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jaccard J., Turrisi R., Wan C.K. (1990). Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Sage publication, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  22. Jöreskog K.G. (1970). A general method for analysis of covariance structures. Biometrika 57: 239–251Google Scholar
  23. Kline R.B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Lance C.E. (1988). Residual centering, esploratory and confirmatory moderator analysis, and decomposition of effects in path models containing interactions. Applied Psychological Measurement 12: 163–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Land K.C. (1969). Principles of path analysis. In: E. F. Borgatta (ed.), Sociological Methodology. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  26. McClendon M.J. (1994). Multiple Regression and Causal Analysis. F. E. Peacock Publishers, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  27. Nishina K. (2001). Application of statistical causal analysis to process analysis. In: Lenz H.J., Wilrich P.T. (eds) Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control. Physica-Verlag, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  28. Pindyck R.S., Rubinfeld D.L. (1981). Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. McGraw-Hill International Editions, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Ritschard G., Kellerhals J., Olszak M., Sardi M. (1996). Path analysis with partial association measures. Quality & Quantity 30: 37–60Google Scholar
  30. Stanghellini E., Wermuth N. (2005). On the identification of path analysis models with one hidden variable. Biometrika 92: 337–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tan W.Y. (1982). Sampling distributions and Robustness of t, F and Variance-Ratio in two sample and ANOVA models with respect to departure from normality. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 11: 2485–2511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tukey, J. W. (1964). Causation, regression and path analysis. In: Statistics and Mathematics in Biology. New York: Hafner Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  33. Winship C., Mare R.D. (1983). Structural equations and path analysis for discrete data. American Journal of Sociology 89: 54–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wright S. (1921). Correlation and causation. Journal of Agricultural Research 20: 557–585Google Scholar
  35. Yamauchi F. (2004). Are experience and schooling complementary? Evidence from migrants’ assimilation in the Bangkok labor market. Journal of Development Economics 74: 489–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze EconomicheUniversità di CassinoCassinoItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e StatisticheUniversità di SalernoFisciano (SA)Italy

Personalised recommendations