Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 41, Issue 5, pp 635–659 | Cite as

How Qualitative Data Analysis Software may Support the Qualitative Analysis Process

  • Vincent Peters
  • Fred Wester
Article

Abstract

The last decades have shown large progress in the elaboration of procedures for qualitative data analysis and in the development of computer programs to support this kind of analysis. We believe, however, that the link between methodology and computer software tools is too loose, especially for a novice qualitative researcher. It is very unclear to select the proper functions and tools as a support in a specific phase of analysis. In texts, you will find a description of the steps of qualitative analysis, and in separate texts computer tools are presented, but what function or tool to use in what phase of analysis is hardly discussed. In this article, we will elaborate the phases of the grounded theory approach and indicate which of the tools of the computer program Kwalitan is to be used in each of the steps and procedures. We will also show how the functions of the computer program may be used when doing a qualitative analysis according to three other approaches, namely summarizing analysis, ethnographic analysis and narrative analysis.

Keywords

computer programs ethnographic analysis grounded theory Kwalitan narrative analysis qualitative analysis qda summarizing analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bryman A. and Bell A. (2003). Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Denzin N. and Lincoln Y. (eds) (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publicaions, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Fielding N. and Lee R. (1991). Using Computers in Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Glaser B. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity. Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Sociology Press, Mill ValleyGoogle Scholar
  5. Glaser B. and Strauss A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  6. Hijmans E. (1996). The logic of qualitative media content analysis: a typology. Communications 21(1): 92–108Google Scholar
  7. Hycner R. (1985). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human Studies 8: 279–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Maso I. (1987). Kwalitatief Onderzoek. [Qualitative Research]. Boom, MeppelGoogle Scholar
  9. Mason J. (1996). Qualitative Researching. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Miles M. and Huberman A. (1994). Qualitative Data-analysis An Expanded Sourcebook of New methods, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  11. Peters V. (2005). Kwalitan. A Support Program for Qualitative Analysis. Version 6 (computer program). University of Nijmegen, NijmegenGoogle Scholar
  12. Silverman D. (2001). Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Spradley J. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. Holt Rinehart Winston, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Spradley J. (1980). Participant Observation. Holt Rinehart Winston, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Strauss A. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Strauss A. and Corbin J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research. Grounded Theory, Procedures and Tactics. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Tesch R. (1990). Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools. Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Verloo M. (1992). Macht en Gender in Sociale Bewegingen: Over de Participatie van Vrouwen in Bewonersorganisaties. [Gender and Democracy in Urban Social Movements] PhD dissertation. SUA, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  19. Weizman E. and Miles M. (1994). Computer Programs for Qualitative Analysis. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  20. Wester, F. (1984). De Gefundeerde-Theoriebenadering. Een strategie voor kwalitatief onderzoek. [The Grounded Theory Approach. A Strategy for Qualitative Research]. , Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  21. Wester F. (1995). Strategieën voor Kwalitatief Onderzoek. [Strategies for Qualitative Research], 3rd edn. Coutinho, MuiderbergGoogle Scholar
  22. Wester F. and Peters V. (2004). Kwalitatieve Analyse. Uitgangspunten en Procedures. [Qualitative Analysis. Principles and Procedures]. Uitgeverij Coutinho, BussumGoogle Scholar
  23. Wester F. and Verbrugge N. (2000). Op zoek naar boodschappen in sitcoms. [Looking for messages in sitcoms]. Sociologische Gids 43(2): 243–267Google Scholar
  24. Yin R. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nijmegen School of ManagementRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Kwalitan AdviesMaldenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department for Communication Sciences Social FacultyRadboud UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.MaldenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations