Quality and Quantity

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 435–456 | Cite as

Conducting Online Surveys



The World Wide Web (WWW) is increasingly being used as a tool and platform for survey research. Two types of electronic or online surveys available for data collection are the email and Web based survey, and they constitute the focus of this paper. We address a multitude of issues researchers should consider before and during the use of this method of data collection: advantages and liabilities with this form of survey research, sampling problems, questionnaire design considerations, suggestions in approaching potential respondents, response rates and aspects of data processing. Where relevant, the methodological issues involved are illustrated with examples from our own research practice. This methods review shows that most challenges are resolved when taking into account the principles that guide the conduct of conventional surveys.


online survey Web based survey email survey research methods review sampling procedures response rate 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Babbie, E. 1990Survey Research Methods2WadsworthBelmont, CAGoogle Scholar
  2. Beebe, T.J., Mika, T., Harrison, P.A., Anderson, R.E., Fulkerson, J.A. 1997Computerized school surveys. Design and development issuesSocial Science Computer Review15159169Google Scholar
  3. Bertot, J.C., McClure, C.R. 1996Electronic surveys: methodological implications for using the World Wide Web to collect survey dataHardin, S. eds. Global Complexity: Information, Chaos and ControlInformation TodayMedford, MA173192Google Scholar
  4. Bosnjak, M., Tuten, T.L. 2003Prepaid and promised incentives in Web surveysSocial Science Computer Review21208217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brennan, M., Rae, N., Parackal, M. 1999Survey-based experimental research via the web: Some observationsMarketing Bulletin108392http://marketing-bulletin.massey.ac.nz/article10/article9b.aspGoogle Scholar
  6. Coomber, R. (1997). Using the Internet for survey research. Sociological Research Online,2 (2). http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/2/2.htmlGoogle Scholar
  7. Couper, M.P., Traugott, M., Lamias, M. 2001Web survey design and administrationPublic Opinion Quarterly65230253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crawford, S.D., Couper, M.P., Lamias, M.J. 2001Web surveys. Perceptions of burdenSocial Science Computer Review19146162Google Scholar
  9. Dillman, D. A., Tortora, R. D. & Bowker. D. (1998a). Principles for Constructing Web Surveys. SESRC Technical Report 98-50, Pullman, Washington. http://survey.sesrc.wsu.edu/dillman/papers.htmGoogle Scholar
  10. Dillman, D. A., Tortora, R. D., Conradt, J. & Bowker. D. (1998b). Influence of plain vs. fancy design on response rates for Web surveys. Paper presented at Joint Statistical Meetings, Dallas, Texas. August 1998. http://survey.sesrc.wsu.edu/dillman/papers.htmGoogle Scholar
  11. Heerwegh, D., Loosveldt, G. 2003An evaluation of the semiautomatic login procedure to control Web survey accessSocial Science Computer Review21223234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. James, M.L., Wotring, C.E., Forrest, E.J. 1995An exploratory study of perceived benefits of electronic bulletin board use and their impact on other communication activitiesJournal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media393050Google Scholar
  13. Jankowski, N.W., Selm, M. 2000aThe promise and practice of public debate in cyberspaceHacker, K.L.Dijk, J.A.G.M. eds. Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and PracticeSageLondon149165Google Scholar
  14. Jankowski, N.W., Selm, M. 2000bTraditional news media online: An examination of added valuesCommunications. The European Journal of Communication Research2585101Google Scholar
  15. Kay, B., Johnson, T.J. 1999Research methodology: taming the cyber frontier. Techniques for improving online surveysSocial Science Computer Review17323337Google Scholar
  16. Kehoe, C. M. & Pitkow, J. E. (1996). Surveying the territory: GVU’s five WWW user surveys. World Wide Web Journal 1(3). http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Journal/3/s3.kehoe.htmlGoogle Scholar
  17. Manfreda, K. Lozar, Batagelj, Z. & Vehovar, V. (2002). Design of Web survey questionnaires: Three basic experiments. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(3), http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol7/issue3/vehovar.htmlGoogle Scholar
  18. Mann, C., Stewart, F. 2000Internet Communication and Qualitative Research. A Handbook for Researching OnlineSageLondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Marvin, L. (1996). Spoof, spam, lurk and lag: the aesthetics of text-based virtual realities. JCMC 1(1). http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol1/issue2/marvin.htmlGoogle Scholar
  20. Medlin, C., Roy, S. & Ham Chai, T. (1999). World Wide Web versus mail surveys: A comparison and report. Paper presented at ANZMAC99 Conference: Marketing in the Third Millennium. November 28 – December 1, Sydney, Australia. www.singstat.gov.sg/conferences/ec/f112.pdfGoogle Scholar
  21. Mehta, R., Sivadas, E. 1995Comparing response rates and response content in mail versus electronic mail surveysJournal of the Market Research Society37429439Google Scholar
  22. Mickelson, K.D. 1997Seeking social support: parents in electronic support groupsKiesler, S. eds. Culture of the InternetLawrence ErlbaumMahwah, New Jersey157178Google Scholar
  23. Miller, T.I., Kobayashi, M., Caldwell, E., Thurson, S., Collett, B. 2002Citizen Surveys on the Web: General Population Surveys of Community OpinionSocial Science Computer Review20124136Google Scholar
  24. Patrick, A.S., Black, A., Whalen, T.E. 1995Rich, young, male, dissatisfied computer geeks? Demographics and satisfaction from the National Capital FreeNetGodfrey, D.Levy, M. eds. Proceedings of Telecommunities 95: The International Community Networking ConferenceTelecommunitiesCanada, Victoria, British Columbia83107Google Scholar
  25. Perseus Development Corporation (2000). Survey 101- A Complete guide to a successful survey. http://www.perseus.com/surveytips/Survey 101.htmGoogle Scholar
  26. Pitkow, J. E. & Recker, M. M. (1995). Using the web as a survey tool: Results from the second WWW user survey. GVU’s WWW User Surveys. ftp://ftp.gvu.gatech.edu/pub/gvu/www/survey/papers/survey 2 paper.pdfGoogle Scholar
  27. Schaefer, D.R., Dillman, D.A. 1998Development of a standard e-mail methodologyPublic Opinion Quarterly62378397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sheehan, K.B., McMillan, S.J. 1999Response variation in e-mail surveys: An explorationJournal of Advertising Research394554Google Scholar
  29. Sills, S.J., Song, C. 2002Innovations in Survey Research: An application of Web-based surveysSocial Science Computer Review202230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith, C. B. (1997). Casting the Net: surveying an Internet population.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3(1). http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/smith.htmlGoogle Scholar
  31. Swoboda, W.J., Mühlberger, N., Weikunat, R., Schneeweiss, S. 1997Internet surveys by direct mailing. An innovative way of collecting dataSocial Science Computer Review15242255Google Scholar
  32. Dijk, J.A.G.M. 2000Widening information gaps and policies of preventionHacker, K.Dijk, J. eds. Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and PracticeSageLondon166183Google Scholar
  33. Selm, M., Jankowski, N.W., Kleijn, B. 2004Dutch web radio as a medium for audience interactionCrisell, A. eds. More than a Music Box: Radio Cultures and Communities in a Multi-media WorldBerghahnNew York, Oxford265282Google Scholar
  34. Vehovar, V. & Manfreda, K. L. (1999). Web surveys: Can the weighting solve the problem? Paper presented at the 1999 AAPOR Conference, St. Petersburg, Florida, May 13–16. http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/papers/1999 168.pdfGoogle Scholar
  35. Wright, K. B. (2005). Researching Internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10(3), http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/wright.htmlGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social Science Research Methodology, Faculty of Social SciencesRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of CommunicationRadboud University NijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations