Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Action Research is Similar to Design Science

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In management information systems (MIS) action research is long considered as promising but low-level research approach. It has an utmost relevance because action researchers are working with practitioners to solve the important practical problem. Design science outlined some years ago is just winning a wider audience. Action research was traditionally classified into qualitative research methods. But it seems to be the “wrong” home of action research. We shall show that after comparison of the seven aspects: concrete results of the study, knowledge produced, activities, the intent and the nature of a study, the division of labor in a study and generation, use and test of knowledge, the concordance between the characteristics of action research on the one hand and of design science on the other hand is very good. Hence, action research and design science should next be considered as similar research approaches, and this is a turning point in the history of both action research and design science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • D.E. Avison A.T. Wood-Harper R.T. Vidgen J.R.G. Wood (1998) ArticleTitleA further exploration into information systems development: The evolution of Multiview2 Information, Technology and People 11 IssueID2 124–139 Occurrence Handle10.1108/09593849810218319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Baskerville M.D. Myers (2004) ArticleTitleSpecial issue on action research in information systems: Making IS research relevant to practice – foreword MIS Quarterly 28 IssueID3 329–335

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Baskerville A.T. Wood-Harper (1998) ArticleTitleDiversity in information systems action research methods European Journal of Information Systems 7 90–107 Occurrence Handle10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Bunge (1967a) Scientific Research I. The Search for System Springer-Verlag Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Bunge (1967b) Scientific Research II. The Search for Truth Springer-Verlag Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Burrell G. Morgan (1979) Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis Heinemann London

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Checkland (1981) Systems Thinking, Systems Practice Wiley Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Coghlan (2001) ArticleTitleInsider action research projects – Implications for practising managers Management Learning 32 IssueID1 49–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis G. B., and Parker C. A. (1979). Writing the Doctoral Dissertation – A Systematic Approach. New York, Barron’s Educational Series.

  • C.F. Gibson (1975) A methodology for implementation research R.L. Schultz D.P. Slevin (Eds) Implementing Operations Research/Management Science American Elsevier New York

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Gummeson (2000) Qualitative Methods in Management Research Sage Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • A.R. Hevner S.T. March J. Park S. Ram (2004) ArticleTitleDesign science in information systems research MIS Quarterly 28 IssueID1 75–105

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Hult S.-Å. Lennung (1980) ArticleTitleTowards a definition of action research: A note and bibliography Journal of Management Studies 17 241–250

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Iivari (1991) ArticleTitleA paradigmatic analysis of contemporary schools of IS development European Journal of Information Systems 1 IssueID4 249–272

    Google Scholar 

  • J.H. Iversen L. Mathiassen P.A. Nielsen (2004) ArticleTitleManaging risk in software process improvement: An action research approach MIS Quarterly 28 IssueID3 395–433

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Ives S. Hamilton G.B. Davis (1980) ArticleTitleA framework for research in computer-based management information systems Management Science 26 IssueID9 910–934 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.26.9.910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Järvinen (2004a) On Research Methods Opinpajan Kirja Tampere, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvinen, P. (ed.) (2004b). IS Reviews, in http://www.cs.uta.fi/reports/dsarja/D-2004-3.pdf.

  • Keen, P. G. W. (1974). Towards a behavioral methodology for the study of OR/MS implementation. Unpublished paper, MIT.

  • B. Lallé (2003) ArticleTitleThe management science researcher between theory and practice Organization Studies 24 IssueID7 1097–1114 Occurrence Handle10.1177/01708406030247005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Lindgren O. Henfridsson U. Schultze (2004) ArticleTitleDesign principles for competence management systems: A synthesis of an action research study MIS Quarterly 28 IssueID3 435–472

    Google Scholar 

  • S.T. March G.F. Smith (1995) ArticleTitleDesign and natural science research on information technology Decision Support Systems 15 IssueID4 251–266 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.L. Markus A. Majchrzak L. Gasser (2002) ArticleTitleA design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes MIS Quarterly 26 IssueID3 179–212

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Mumford (1995) Effective Systems Design and Requirements Analysis Macmillan London

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Mårtensson A.S. Lee (2004) ArticleTitleDialogical action research at Omega Corporation MIS Quarterly 28 IssueID3 507–536

    Google Scholar 

  • J.F. Nunamaker M. Chen T.D.M. Purdin (1991) ArticleTitleSystems development in information systems research Journal of Management Information Systems 7 IssueID3 89–106

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Oquist (1978) ArticleTitleThe epistemology of action research Acta Sociologica 21 143–163

    Google Scholar 

  • W.J. Orlikowski J.J. Baroudi (1991) ArticleTitleStudying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions Information Systems Research 2 IssueID1 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Owen (1997) ArticleTitleDesign research: Building the knowledge base Journal of the Japanese Society for the Science of Design 5 IssueID2 36–45

    Google Scholar 

  • R.N. Rapoport (1970) ArticleTitleThree dilemmas in action research Human Relations 23 499–513 Occurrence Handle10.1177/001872677002300601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H.A. Simon (1981) The Sciences of the Artificial MIT Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • B.C. Smith (1985) ArticleTitleThe limits of correctness Computers and Society 15 IssueID3 18–26

    Google Scholar 

  • G.I. Susman R.D. Evered (1978) ArticleTitleAn assessment of the scientific merits of action research Administrative Science Quarterly 23 582–603 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2392581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaishnavi, V. and Kuechler, W. (2004). Design Research in Information Systems. Available at http://www.isworld.org/Researchdesign/drisISworld.htm.

  • J.E. Aken ParticleVan (2004) ArticleTitleManagement research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules Journal of Management Studies 41 IssueID2 219–246 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00430.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.L. Horn ParticleVan (1973) ArticleTitleEmpirical studies of management information systems Database 5 IssueID2 and 3 172–180

    Google Scholar 

  • J.G. Walls G.R. Widmeyer O.A. El Sawy (1992) ArticleTitleBuilding an information system design theory for vigilant EIS Information Systems Research 1 IssueID1 36–59 Occurrence Handle10.1287/isre.3.1.36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Weber (2003) ArticleTitleTheoretically speaking MIS Quarterly 27 IssueID3 iii–xii

    Google Scholar 

  • J.P. Womack D.J. Jones D. Roos (1990) The Machine that Changed the World: How Japan’s Secret Weapon in the Global Auto Wars will Revolutionize Western Industry: The Story of Lean Production Harper Perennial New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Sciences, University of Tampere, FIN-330014, Finland

    Pertti Järvinen

Authors
  1. Pertti Järvinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pertti Järvinen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Järvinen, P. Action Research is Similar to Design Science. Qual Quant 41, 37–54 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-5427-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-5427-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation