Advertisement

Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 161–185 | Cite as

Integration of knowledge management and collaborative learning by technical supported communication processes

  • Andrea Kienle
Article

Abstract

To date the development of technical systems to support learning either in schools and universities (CSCL-systems), or in companies (knowledge-management systems) have largely developed separately concurrent, with no or little mutual exchange of experience. The approach presented here seeks to combine the strengths of both lines of development in order that both benefits from each others advantages achieve advantages for each development. Detailed requirements engineering is presented regarding, three research fields: communication theory; learning processes; and a study in companies. The requirements collected led to a sophisticated concept of annotations where annotations serve as communicative contributions, and (segmented) material is used as context. The combination and distinction between communicative contributions, and the material itself is a suitable approach for integrating the advantages of CSCL-systems (communication support) and knowledge management systems (support of content storage). These requirements are combined in a software system, KOLUMBUS, presented with its key features. To gather experience with KOLUMBUS and to convey potential for further improvement, two case studies were conducted. The main results, advantages and further potentials derived from these two case studies are described in this paper. The paper concludes with design recommendations for similar technical systems, as well as organizational hints for CSCL-groups (in schools or universities as well as in companies).

Keywords

CSCL Learning platform Knowledge management Communication support Evaluation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Appelt, W. and Mambrey, P. (1999) Experiences with the BSCW Shared Workspace System as the Backbone of a Virtual Learning Environment for Students. InProceedings of ED Media `99, Charlottesville, pp. 1710–1715Google Scholar
  2. Argyris, C. and Schön, D. A. (1996)Organizational Learning II. TheoryMethod and Practice. Addison Weasley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernheim Brush, A. J. and Bargeron, D., Grudin, J., Borning, A. and Gupta, A. (2002) Supporting Interactions Outside of Class: Anchored Discussions vs. Discussion Boards. InProceedings of CSCL 2002. Edited by G. Stahl. New Jersey, January, pp. 425–434Google Scholar
  4. Clark, H. H. and Brennan, S. E. (1991) Grounding in Communication. In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. L.B. Resnick; J. M. Levine; S. D. Teasley (eds)American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 127–149Google Scholar
  5. Davis, J. and Huttenlocher, D. (1995) Shared Annotation for Cooperative Learning. InProceedings of CSCL 1995. Edited by J. L. Schnase and E. L. Cunnius, pp. 84–88Google Scholar
  6. Dietinger, T. and Maurer, H. (1998) GENTLE-General Network Training and learning Environment. InProceedings of the Ed-Media 1998, FreiburgGoogle Scholar
  7. von Glasersfeld, E. (1984) An introduction to radical Constructivism. In:The Invention of Reality, P. Watzlawick (ed.). New York. pp 17–40Google Scholar
  8. Guzdial, M. and Turns, J. (2000) Effective discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forumJournal of the Learning Science9(4), pp. 437–470Google Scholar
  9. Heijst G. van, Spek, R. van der and Kruizinga, E. (1998) The Lessons Learned Cycle. InInformation Technology for Knowledge Management. Edited by U. M. Borghoff and R. Pareschi (eds.) Springer, Berlin, pp. 17–34Google Scholar
  10. Henri, F. (1995) Distance Learning and Computer-Mediated Communication: Interactive, Quasi-Interactive or Monologue. InComputer Supported Collaborative Learning. O'Malley, C. (ed.) Springer, Berlin, pp. 146–161Google Scholar
  11. Herrmann, T. (2003) Learning and Teaching in Socio-Technical Environments. InInformatics and the Digital Society. Social, Ethical and Cognitive Issues. T. J. van Weert; R. K. Munro (eds.) Kluwer, Boston, pp. 59–72Google Scholar
  12. Herrmann, T., Hoffmann, M., Kunau, G., and Loser, K.-U. (2004) A Modeling Method for the Development of Groupware Applications as Socio-Technical Systems. In:Behaviour & Information Technology. 23(2), pp. 119–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Herrmann, T. and Kienle, A. (2003) KOLUMBUS: Context-oriented communication support in a collaborative learning environment. InInformatics and the Digital Society. Social, Ethical and Cognitive Issues. T. J. van Weert; R. K. Munro (eds.): Kluwer, Boston, pp. 251–260Google Scholar
  14. Herrmann, T. and Loser, K.-U. (1999) Vagueness in models of socio-technical systems. InBehavior & Information Technology: Special Issue on Analysis of Cooperation and Communication, 18(5), pp. 313–323Google Scholar
  15. Hoadley, C. M. and Enyeda, N. (1999) Between Information and Communication: Middle Spaces in Computer Media for Learning. InProceedings of the CSCL 1999. Edited by C. M. Hoadley; J. Roschelle. pp. 242–251Google Scholar
  16. Koschmann, T. (2001) Dewey's contribution to a standard of Problem-Based Learning. InEuropean Perspectives on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Edited by P. Dillenbourg; A. Eurelings; K. Hakkarainen. pp. 356–363Google Scholar
  17. Koschmann T. (ed.) (1996) CSCL: Theory and PracticeLawrence Erlbaum Associates, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  18. Kienle, A. and Herrmann, T. (2003) Integration of communication, coordination and learning material—a guide for the functionality of collaborative learning environments. InProceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. pp. 33Google Scholar
  19. Kienle, A. and Herrmann, T. (2004) Collaborative learning at the workplace by technical support of communication and negotiation. InMultikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI), Volume 1. Edited by Adelsberger et al., pp. 43–57Google Scholar
  20. Kimball, L. (1998) Managing distance learning —new challenges for faculty. InThe Digital University, R. Hazemi S., Hailes S., Wilbur (eds.). Springer, London, pp. 25–38Google Scholar
  21. Koschmann, T. (1996) Paradigm Shifts and Instructional Technology: An Introduction. InCSCL: Theory and Practice, T. Koschmann (ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (LEA), New Jersey. pp. 1–26Google Scholar
  22. Lipponen, L. (2001) Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: From Promises to Reality. PhD Thesis, University of Turku, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  23. Luhmann, N. (1995) Social systems. StanfordGoogle Scholar
  24. McCarthy, J. C. and Monk, A. F. (1994) Channels, conversation, cooperation and relevance: all you wanted to know about communication but were affraid to askCollaborative Computing, 1, pp. 35–60Google Scholar
  25. Maturana, H. and Varela, F. (1987) The Tree of Knowledge: The biological roots of human understandingNew Science Library, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  26. Mayes, T. and Coventry, L., Thomson, A., and Mason, R. (1994) Learning through Telematics-Part two: The discussionProject report of The Learning through Telematics projectGoogle Scholar
  27. Parsons, Talcott (1967) The social System. Lowe & Brydone Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C. (1996) Student Communities for the Advancement of KnowledgeCommunications of the ACM39(1), pp. 36–37Google Scholar
  29. Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W. (1949) TheMathematical Theory of Communication, The University of Illinois, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  30. Stahl, G. (2000) A Model of Collaborative Knowledge-Building. In:Proceedings of the International Conference on the Learning Science (ICLS)Google Scholar
  31. Stahl, G. (2002) Contributions to a Theoretical Framework on CSCL. In: Stahl, G. (Ed.) (2002): Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. Foundations for a CSCL Community. InProceedings of CSCL 2002. Edited by G. Stahl. New Jersey, January, pp. 62–71Google Scholar
  32. Ungeheuer, G. (1982) Vor-Urteile über Sprechen, Mitteilen, Verstehen. InKommunikationstheoretische Schriften 1, Ungeheuer (ed.), Rader, Aachen, pp. 229–338Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fraunhofer Integrated Publication and Information Systems Institute (IPSI)DarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations