Becoming a Population: Seeing the State, Being Seen by the State, and the Politics of Eviction in Cape Town

Abstract

While existing literature has amply demonstrated how states may “see” their populations, we know less about which residents are legible to the state as populations. Drawing on extended ethnographic fieldwork and interviews conducted between 2011 and 2019 in Cape Town, South Africa, this paper compares the fate of two large land occupations, one of which was evicted, one of which was not. In doing so, this paper demonstrates how rather than taking “populations” as a given, this status should be understood as an outcome. It suggests that participants in each respective occupation began with different views of the state. In other words, the way residents saw the state impacted each respective organizational outcome, which in turn affected how they were seen by the state. In one occupation, participants saw the state as a partner in obtaining housing, and so they organized themselves as atomized recipients. In the other, they viewed the state as an obstacle, and so they organized themselves collectively. Only in the latter case were residents viewed as a population; in the former, they were all evicted. Ultimately, this paper argues that, by bringing tools from political sociology to bear upon urban ethnography, we can gain insight into a process otherwise overlooked in the literature, allowing us to make sense of a question that is central to understanding urban politics in the global South: how do municipal governments decide which occupations to evict and which to tolerate?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Alexander, Peter, Carin Runciman, and Trevor Ngwane. 2014. Media briefing: Community protests. Paper presented at the social change research unit, University of Johannesburg, South Africa, 12 February 2014.

  2. Auerbach, Adam M. 2016. Clients and communities: The political economy of party network organization and development in India’s urban slums. World Politics 68 (1): 111–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bayat, Asef. 2013. Life as politics: How ordinary people change the Middle East. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berrisford, Stephen, and Michael Kihato. 2006. The role of planning law in evictions in sub-Saharan Africa. South African Review of Sociology 37 (1): 20–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhan, Gautam. 2016. In the public’s interest: Evictions, citizenship, and inequality in contemporary Delhi. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brubaker, Rogers. 2002. Ethnicity without groups. European Journal of Sociology 43 (2): 163–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chatterjee, Partha. 2004. The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chatterjee, Partha. 2011. Lineages of political society: Studies in postcolonial democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Foucault, Michel. 1995. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Foucault, Michel. 2007. Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977—1978. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ghertner, D. Asher. 2015. Rule by aesthetics: World-class city making in Delhi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goldman, Michael. 2011. Speculative urbanism and the making of the next world city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (3): 555–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Holston, James. 2008. Insurgent citizenship: Disjunctions of democracy and modernity in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huchzermeyer, Marie. 2001. Housing for the poor? Negotiated housing policy in South Africa. Habitat International 25 (3): 303–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huchzermeyer, Marie. 2003. Housing rights in South Africa: Invasions, evictions, the media, and the courts in the cases of Grootboom, Alexandra, and Bredell. Urban Forum 14 (1): 80–107.

  16. Huchzermeyer, Marie. 2011. Cities with “slums”: From informal settlement eradication to a right to the city in Africa. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lees, Loretta, Hyun Bang Shin, and Ernesto López-Morales. 2016. Planetary gentrification Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Levenson, Zachary. 2017a. Social movements beyond incorporation: The case of the housing assembly in post-apartheid Cape Town. In Global resistance in southern perspective: The politics of protest in South Africa’s contentious democracy, ed. M. Paret, C. Runciman, and L. Sinwell, 89–104. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Levenson, Zachary. 2017b. Precarious welfare states: Urban struggles over housing delivery in post-apartheid South Africa. International Sociology 32 (4): 474–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Levenson, Zachary. 2018. The road to TRAs is paved with good intentions: Dispossession through delivery in post-apartheid Cape Town. Urban Studies 54 (14): 3218–3233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Levenson, Zachary. 2019. “Such elements do not belong in an ordered society”: Managing rural-urban resettlement in democratic South Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change 19 (3): 427–446.

  22. Levenson, Zachary. 2021a. Post-apartheid housing delivery as a (failed) project of remediation. In Land issues for urban governance in sub-Saharan Africa, ed. R. Home, 189–206. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Levenson, Zachary. 2021b. South African evictions today. Contexts 20 (1): 26–31.

  24. McDonald, David A. 2008. World city syndrome: Neoliberalism and inequality in Cape Town. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Papier, Melissa. 2011. Voter turnout strong among protests. People’s Post Mitchells Plain, 6.

  26. Powell, Derek M., Michael O’Donovan, and Jaap De Visser. 2014. Civic protests barometer 2007–2014. Dullah Omar Institute for Constitutional law, governance and human rights, University of the Western Cape. Cape Town: Multi-Level Government Initiative. https://dullahomarinstitute.org.za/acsl/barometers/20150219-civic-protest-barometer-published-dp.pdf/view.

  27. Ren, Xuefei. 2020. Governing the urban in China and India: Land grabs, slum clearance, and the war on air pollution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Roy, Ananya. 2003. City requiem, Calcutta: Gender and the politics of poverty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Roy, Ananya, and Aihwa Ong, eds. 2011. Worlding cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2004. Critique of dialectical reason, volume one. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sassen, Saskia. 2001. The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Scott, James C. 2009. The art of not being governed: An anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Simone, Abdoumaliq. 2004. For the city yet to come: African life in four cities. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Slater, Tom. 2017. Planetary rent gaps. Antipode 49 (S1): 114–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Smith, Neil. 1996. The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wei, Ye Hua. 2012. Restructuring for growth in urban China: Transitional institutions, urban development, and spatial transformation. Habitat International 36 (3): 395–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Weinstein, Liza. 2013. Demolition and dispossession: Toward an understanding of state violence in millennial Mumbai. Studies in Comparative International Development 48 (3): 285–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Weinstein, Liza. 2014. The durable slum: Dharavi and the right to stay put in globalizing Mumbai. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Weinstein, Liza. 2021. Evictions: Reconceptualizing housing insecurity from the global south. City and Community. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12503.

Download references

Acknowledgments

I want to thank Tad Skotnicki, Sahan Karatasli, Sneha Annavarapu, and the two anonymous reviewers for critical feedback that substantially strengthened this paper. Additional credit goes to Michael Burawoy, Gillian Hart, Dylan Riley, Carter Koppelman, Mara Loveman, and Vinay Gidwani for generative criticism on earlier iterations of this paper.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zachary Levenson.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Levenson, Z. Becoming a Population: Seeing the State, Being Seen by the State, and the Politics of Eviction in Cape Town. Qual Sociol (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-021-09476-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Eviction
  • Housing
  • Urban informality
  • States
  • Collective action
  • Post-apartheid South Africa
  • Biopolitics