Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Going Back and Giving Back: The Ethics of Staying in the Field

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article analyzes the benefits and ethical dilemmas of going back and continuing to write about the troupe of drag queens featured in our book, Drag Queens at the 801 Cabaret. The benefits include providing the drag queens the opportunity to revise and add to the stories we told about them and, through deepening friendships, changing the balance of power among us. Challenges include dealing with responses to the book, including those of family members, and conflicts over the royalties we shared with the troupe. Despite the pitfalls, going back contributes to public sociology by continuing conversations about research findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baca Zinn, M. (2001). Insider field research in minority communities. In R. M. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research (2nd ed., pp. 159–166). Prospect Heights: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, B. (2011). My auto/ethnographic dilemma: Who owns the story? Qualitative Sociology, 34(3).

  • Barton, B. (forthcoming). Pray the gay away. New York: New York University Press.

  • Blee, K. M. (1998). White-knuckle research: Emotional dynamics in fieldwork with racist activists. Qualitative Sociology, 21, 381–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blee, K. M. (2003). Inside organized racism: Women in the hate movement. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, R. (1995). Tricks, friends, and lovers: Erotic encounters in the field. In D. Kulick & M. Willson (Eds.), Taboo: Sex, identity and erotic subjectivity in anthropological fieldwork (pp. 106–126). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapkis, W. (2010). Productive tensions: Ethnographic engagement, complexity, and contradiction. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 39, 483–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currier, A. (2011). Representing gender and sexual dissidence in southern Africa. Qualitative Sociology, 34.

  • Duneier, M. (1994). Sidewalk. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duneier, M. (2001). On the evolution of sidewalk. In R. M. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research (2nd ed., pp. 167–187). Prospect Heights: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einwohner, R. (2011). Ethical considerations on the use of archived testimonies in Holocaust research: Beyond the IRB exemption. Qualitative Sociology, 34(3).

  • Ellis, C. (1995). Emotional and ethical quagmires in returning to the field. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 24, 68–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. (2007). Telling secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallmeier, C. P. (1991). Leaving, revisiting, and staying in touch: Neglected issues in field research. In W. B. Shaffir & R. A. Stebbins (Eds.), Experiencing fieldwork: An inside view of qualitative research (pp. 224–231). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A., Duneier, M., & Appelbaum, R. (2006). Introduction to sociology (6th ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, J. (2004). Kings, queens hold audience at MCC. Daily Nexus, 84/130, 1.

  • González-López, G. (2011). Mindful ethics: Comments on an informant-centered practices in sociological research. Qualitative Sociology, 34.

  • Goode, E. (2002). Sexual involvement and social research in a fat civil rights organization. Qualitative Sociology, 25, 501–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 261–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, K. (2008). “Does this mean you’re not going to come visit me anymore?” An inquiry into an ethics of reciprocity and positionality in feminist ethnographic research. Sociological Inquiry, 10, 372–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, K. (2006). Into the dark heart of ethnography: The lived ethics and inequality of intimate field relationships. Qualitative Sociology, 29, 155–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. M. (1991). Gone fishing, be back later: Ending and resuming research among fishermen. In W. B. Shaffir & R. A. Stebbins (Eds.), Experiencing fieldwork: An inside view of qualitative research (pp. 232–237). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulick, D. (1995). The sexual life of anthropologists: Erotic subjectivity and ethnographic work. In D. Kulick & M. Willson (Eds.), Taboo: Sex, identity and erotic subjectivity in anthropological fieldwork (pp. 1–21). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. O. (1996). Male homosexuality in Guatemala: Possible insights and certain confusions from sleeping with the natives. In E. Lewin & W. L. Leap (Eds.), Out in the field: Reflections of lesbian and gay anthropologists (pp. 236–260). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naples, N. A. (2004). The outsider phenomenon. In S. H. Hesse-Biber & M. L. Yaiser (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on social research (pp. 373–381). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, E. (1996). My best informant’s dress: The erotic equation in fieldwork. In E. Lewin & W. L. Leap (Eds.), Out in the field: Reflections of lesbian and gay anthropologists (pp. 212–235). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, J. (2010). Seldom told tales from the field: Guest editor’s introduction to the special issue. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 39, 41–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punch, M. (1986). The politics and ethics of fieldwork. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, S. L. (2004). Fieldwork and the erotic economy on the colonial frontier. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 29, 1041–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, L. J. (2006). When women’s studies isn’t about women: Writing about drag queens. In C. Berkin, J. L. Pinch, & C. S. Appel (Eds.), Looking forward, looking back (pp. 55–67). Saddle River: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, L. J., & Taylor, V. (2003). Drag queens at the 801 cabaret. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, L. J., & Taylor, V. (2005). The 801 girls talk about Drag queens at the 801 cabaret, July 5, 2004, edited interview. Sexualities, 8, 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, L. J., Taylor, V., & Shapiro, E. I. (2010). Drag queens and drag kings: The difference gender makes. Sexualities, 13, 275–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.K. (1997). Participant observation and informal education. The encyclopaedia of informal education. Retrieved from www.infed.org/research/participant_observation.htm.

  • Stacey, J. (1988). Can there be a feminist ethnography? Women’s Studies International Forum, 11, 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, R. A. (1991). Do we ever leave the field? Notes on secondary fieldwork involvements. In W. B. Shaffir & R. A. Stebbins (Eds.), Experiencing fieldwork: An inside view of qualitative research (pp. 248–255). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, A. (2010). Sex, truths, and audiotape: Anonymity and the ethics of exposure in public ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 39, 554–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. J. (1991). Leaving the field: Research, relationships, and responsibilities. In W. B. Shaffir & R. A. Stebbins (Eds.), Experiencing fieldwork: An inside view of qualitative research (pp. 238–247). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, V. & Rupp, L.J. (2003). Le performance dell’identità: la cultura come forma di protesta. In L. Leonini (Ed.), Identità e movimenti sociali in una società planetaria: In ricordo di Alberto Melucci (pp. 136–181). Milan: Edizioni Angelo Guerini e Associati.

  • Taylor, V., & Rupp, L. J. (2004). Chicks with dicks, men in dresses: What it means to be a drag queen. Journal of Homosexuality, 46, 113–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, V., & Rupp, L. J. (2005a). Crossing boundaries in participatory action research: Performing protest with drag queens. In D. Croteau, W. Hoynes, & C. Ryan (Eds.), Rhyming hope and history: Activism and social movement scholarship (pp. 239–264). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, V., & Rupp, L. J. (2005b). When the girls are men: Negotiating gender and sexual dynamics in a study of drag queens. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 2115–2139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, V., & Rupp, L. J. (2006). Learning from drag queens. Contexts, 5(Summer), 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, V., & Rupp, L. J. (2011). Chapter. In S. Fenstermaker & N. Jones (Eds.), Sociologists backstage: Answers to 10 questions about what they do (pp. 217–230). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, V., Rupp, L. J., & Gamson, J. (2004). Performing protest: Drag shows as tactical repertoire of the gay and lesbian movement. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts, and Change, 25, 105–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, D. R. (1991). High-risk methodology: Reflections on leaving an outlaw society. In W. B. Shaffir & R. A. Stebbins (Eds.), Experiencing fieldwork: An inside view of qualitative research (pp. 211–223). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Feminist Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-7110, USA

    Leila J. Rupp

  2. Department of Sociology, Department of Feminist Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-7110, USA

    Verta Taylor

Authors
  1. Leila J. Rupp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Verta Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leila J. Rupp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rupp, L.J., Taylor, V. Going Back and Giving Back: The Ethics of Staying in the Field. Qual Sociol 34, 483–496 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-011-9200-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-011-9200-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation