Advertisement

Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 491–511 | Cite as

Organization Formation as Epistemic Practice: The Early Epistemological Function of the American Medical Association

  • Owen Whooley
SPECIAL ISSUE ON KNOWLEDGE IN PRACTICE

Abstract

This research explores how social actors adjudicate knowledge claims within intellectual environments where epistemic standards are contested. Through the case study of 19th century debates over cholera in the United States, I examine the strategies deployed by orthodox and homeopathic physicians in the struggle over medical knowledge during this “epistemic contest.” The 1832 cholera epidemic ushered in a crisis for orthodox medicine, as epistemological standards for adjudicating medical knowledge claims became challenged and ill-defined. Failing to muster an effective cultural response to homeopathy, orthodoxy adopted an organizational strategy, forming the American Medical Association and offering professional membership as a proxy indicator of legitimate knowledge. The AMA created an organizational/intellectual space insulated from homeopathy, which translated into a concerted campaign to exclude homeopaths from government institutions and affected the nature of orthodox knowledge on cholera. This case reveals that epistemic contests are not waged by cultural means only; organizational practices form an integral part of actors’ repertoires in adjudicating epistemological claims in practice.

Keywords

Epistemic contest Knowledge Epistemology Organizational practice 

References

  1. Abend, G. (2006). Styles of sociological thought: Sociologies, epistemologies, and the Mexican and U.S. quests for truth. Sociological Theory, 24, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackernecht, E. H. (1967). Medicine at the Paris hospital, 1794–1848. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, G. W. (1996). Doctors in blue: The medical history of the Union Army in the Civil War. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, P. (1947). Etiological theory in America prior to the Civil War. Journal of the History and Medicine, 2, 484–520.Google Scholar
  5. American Medical Association. (1847). Proceedings of the National Medical Convention, held in the City of New York in May, 1846. Philadelphia: Collins.Google Scholar
  6. American Medical Association. (1851). Code of medical ethics of the American Medical Association. Chicago: American Medical Association.Google Scholar
  7. American Medical Association. (1854). Transactions of the american medical association (Vol. 7). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  8. American Medical Association. (1878). Transactions of the American medical association (Vol. 29). Philadelphia, PA: Collins.Google Scholar
  9. American Medical Times. (1863). The week. American Medical Times, 6, 56.Google Scholar
  10. Bartlett, E. (1844). An essay on the philosophy of medical science. Philadelphia: Lea & Blanchard.Google Scholar
  11. Bissell, D. P. (1866). Annual address. Transactions of the medical society of the State of New York (pp. 3–23). Van Benthuysen: Albany.Google Scholar
  12. Brinsmade, T. C. (1859). Annual address before the Medical Society and members of the legislature. Transactions of the Medical Society of the State of New York, 1859 (pp. 5–30). Albany: van Benthuysen.Google Scholar
  13. Butler, S. W., Levis, R. J., & Butler, L. C. (1861). Mr. Fergusson holding the professional intercourse with homeopaths. Medical and Surgical Reporter, 6, 496–497.Google Scholar
  14. Carruthers, B., & Espeland, W. (1991). Accounting for rationality—double-entry bookkeeping and the rhetoric of economic rationality. The American Journal of Sociology, 97, 31–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cassedy, J. H. (1984). American medicine and statistical thinking, 1800–1860. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Chapman, N. (1848). Transactions of the American medical association (Vol. 1). Philadelphia: Collins.Google Scholar
  17. Clark, A. (1854). Annual address delivered before New York State Medical Society and members of the legislature. Transactions of the Medical Society of the State of New York, 1853, 1854 (pp. 271–295). Albany: van Benthuysen.Google Scholar
  18. Cook, S. A. (1846). Address delivered before the Medical Society of the County of Rensselaer. Transactions of the New York Medical Society (Vol. 6, pp. 104–132). Munsell: Albany.Google Scholar
  19. Coulter, H. L. (1969). Political and social aspects of nineteenth-century medicine in the United States. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
  20. Coulter, H. L. (1973). Divided legacy: A history of the schism in medical thought. Washington: McGrath.Google Scholar
  21. Daston, L. (1992). Objectivity and the escape from perspective. Social Studies of Science, 22, 567–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davidson, A. I. (2001). The emergence of sexuality: Historical epistemology and the formation of concepts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dear, P. (1992). From truth to disinterestedness in the seventeenth century. Social Studies of Science, 22, 619–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dickson, S. H. (1849). On the progress of Asiatic cholera during the years, 1844-46-47-48. New York Journal of Medicine, 2, 9–20.Google Scholar
  25. Duffy, J. (1993). From humors to medical science: A history of American medicine. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  26. Duffy, J. (1990). The sanitarians: A history of American public health. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  27. Epstein, S. (1996). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  28. Fishbein, M. (1947). A history of the American Medical Association, 1847 to 1947. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  29. Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Foucault, M. (1994). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  31. Foucault, M. (1973). The order of things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  32. Fourcade-Gourinchas, M. (2001). Politics, institutional structures, and the rise of economics: A comparative study. Theory and Society, 30, 397–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Freidson, E. (1988). Profession of medicine: A study of the sociology of applied knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Frickel, S. (2004). Chemical consequences: Environmental mutagens, scientist activism, and the rise of genetic toxicology. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Frickel, S., & Gross, N. (2005). A general theory of scientific and intellectual movements. American Sociological Review, 70, 204–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Frickel, S., & Moore, K. (2006). The new political sociology of knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  37. Fuller, S. (1988). Social epistemology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Guston, D. (1999). Stabilizing the boundary between U.S. politics and science: The role of the Office Technology Transfer as a boundary organization. Social Studies of Science, 29, 87–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hacking, I. (1985). Styles of scientific reasoning. In. J. Rajchman & C. West (Eds.), Post-analytic philosophy (pp.145–164). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Haller, J. S. (1981). American medicine in transition, 1840–1910. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  42. Haller, J. S. (2000). The people’s doctors: Samuel Thomson and the American Botanical Movement, 1790–1860. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Haller, J. S. (2005). The history of American homeopathy: The academic years, 1820–1935. New York: Pharmaceutical Products Press.Google Scholar
  44. Hess, D. J. (2004). Medical modernisation, scientific research fields and the epistemic politics of health social movements. Sociology of Health & Illness, 26, 695–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hiller, F. (1867). Medical truth and light for the million. Virginia: Territorial Enterprise Book and Job Printing.Google Scholar
  46. Hooker, W. (1852). Homeopathy: An examination of its doctrines and evidences. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  47. Hooker, W. (1849). Physician and patient. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
  48. Hutchinson, J. C. (1867). Annual address. Transactions of the Medical Society of the State of New York, 1867 (pp. 53–69). Van Benthuysen: Albany.Google Scholar
  49. Jardine, N. (1992). The laboratory revolution in medicine as rhetorical and aesthetic accomplishment. In A. Cunningham & P. Williams (Eds.), The laboratory revolution in medicine (pp. 304–323). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Jones, R. M. (1970). American doctors in Paris, 1820–1861: A statistical profile. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allies Services, 143-157.Google Scholar
  51. Kaufman, M. (1988). Homeopathy in America: The rise and fall and persistence of a medical heresy. In N. Gevitz (Ed.), Other healers: Unorthodox medicine in America (pp. 99–123). Baltimore: Hopkins.Google Scholar
  52. Kleinman, D. L., & Kinchy, A. (2003). Boundaries in science policy making: Bovine growth hormone in the European Union. Sociological Quarterly, 44, 577–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Kurzman, C. (1994). Epistemology and the sociology of knowledge. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 24(3), 267–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Lippe, A. (1865). Who is a homeopathician? Philadelphia: King and Baird.Google Scholar
  57. Longino, H. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Macneven, W. H. (1849). Remarks on the mode by which cholera is propagated. New York Journal of Medicine, 2(2), 186–209.Google Scholar
  59. Mannheim, K. (1955). Ideology and utopia. New York: Harvest Books.Google Scholar
  60. Marks, G., & Beatty, W. K. (1973). The story of medicine in America. New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
  61. Meckel, R. A. (1998). Save the babies: American public health reform and the prevention of infant mortality, 1850–1929. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  62. Metcalf, J. (1869). Discussion on epidemic cholera. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 3, 1–25.Google Scholar
  63. Moore, K. (1996). Organizing integrity: American science and the creation of public interest organizations, 1955–1975. The American Journal of Sociology, 101, 1592–1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. New York Academy of Medicine. (1862). Report of a Special Committee upon the communications remonstrating against homeopathy, from the Oneida County Medical Society and the New York Academy of Medicine. Transactions of the Medical Society of the State of New York, 1862, vol. 15 (pp. 433–438). Albany: van Benthuysen.Google Scholar
  65. New York Assembly Select Committee on Petitions. (1843). Report of the Select Committee on Petitions, praying for the repeal of laws restricting medical practice. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, 3, 1–8.Google Scholar
  66. New York Homeopathic Society. (1834). Homeopathic treatment of cholera: Comparative tables of cures in Russia and Austria. American Journal of Homeopathy, 1, 25–28.Google Scholar
  67. New York Journal of Medicine. (1849). The progress of cholera in America. New York Journal of Medicine, 2, 97–99.Google Scholar
  68. New York Senate Select Committee on Petitions. (1844). Report of the Select Committee on Petitions for the repeal of laws restricting medical practice. Documents of the Senate of the State of New York, 1, 1–4.Google Scholar
  69. Numbers, R. L. (1985). The fall and rise of the American medical profession. In J. Leavitt & R. Numbers (Eds.), Sickness and health in America (2nd ed., pp. 185–196). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  70. Orme, F. H. (1868). Homeopathy—What is it? Detroit: Lodge.Google Scholar
  71. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  72. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  73. Poovey, M. (1998). A history of the modern fact: Problems of knowledge in the sciences of wealth and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  74. Porter, T. M. (1986). The rise of statistical thinking, 1820–1900. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Porter, R. (1998). The greatest benefit to mankind: A medical history of humanity. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  76. Quackenbush, J. V. (1869). Introductory remarks. Transactions of the Medical Society of the State of New York (pp. 4–5). Van Benthuysen: Albany.Google Scholar
  77. Quine, W. V. O. (1969). Ontological relativity and other essays. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Roosa, D. B. (1893). The high aims of the Academy. Transactions of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2, 52–66.Google Scholar
  79. Rosenberg, C. E. (1987). The cholera years: The United States in 1832, 1849, and 1866. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  80. Rosner, D. (1982). A once charitable enterprise: Hospitals and health care in Brooklyn and New York, 1885–1915. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rothstein, W. G. (1992). American physicians in the 19th century: From sects to science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Sayre, L. A. (1870). Minutes of the 63rd annual meeting. Transactions of the Medical Society of the State of New York, 1870. Van Benthuysen: Albany.Google Scholar
  83. Schweber, L. (2006). Disciplining statistics: Demography and vital statistics in France and England, 1830–1885. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Sewell, W. H. (2005). Logics of history: Social theory and social transformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  85. Seymour, W. P. (1857). History of the cholera epidemic of 1854, at Troy, NY. Transactions of the Medical Society of the State of New York (pp. 175–202). Van Benthuysen: Albany.Google Scholar
  86. Shapin, S. (1994). A social history of truth: Civility and science in seventeenth-century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  87. Shapin, S. (2008). The scientific life: A moral history of a late modern vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  88. Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Starr, P. (1982). The social transformation of American medicine. New York: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
  90. Stevens, R. (1971). American medicine and the public interest. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Stow, T. D. (1864). Homeopathy in the army. Transactions of the Homeopathic Medical Society of the State of New York for the Year 1864, vol. 2 (pp. 246–260). Albany: Argus Co. Printers.Google Scholar
  92. Toulmin, S. E. (1992). Cosmopolis: The hidden agenda of modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  93. Van Ingen, P. (1949). The New York Academy of Medicine: Its first hundred years. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Warner, J. H. (1997). The therapeutic perspective: Medical practice, knowledge, and identity in America, 1820–1885. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Warner, J. H. (1998). Against the spirit of system: The French impulse in nineteenth-century American medicine. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Whooley, O. (2008). Objectivity and its discontents: Knowledge advocacy in the Sally Hemings controversy. Social Forces, 86, 1367–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations