Skip to main content
Log in

Fourfold Tables v. Three Dimensional Realities

  • Symposium on Charles Tilly's Why?
  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. Even religion-based politics. As I write this, I read in The Mosman Daily, the local newspaper in an affluent suburb of Sydney, Australia, a letter from a local minister who resists criticism that he is “intoxicated” by religion when he attacks other religions. He explains that “my reading of history is that the reality of Jesus's death and resurrection does, in fact, call in to (sic) question the veracity of every other faith system… . If I am wrong…, then I’ll quit my job at St. Augustine's, go back to corporate finance, and recommend that the church sell its land… .” (August 17, 2006, at p. 26). In the U.S., evolutionary theory remains so disturbing to religious fundamentalists that they have invented an alternative, scientifically formatted “creationism” theory. The point is not that religious views are empirically based but that religionists claim they are.

References

  • Clayman, S. E., & Heritage, J. (2002). Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of US presidents Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication, 52, 749–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1967). Embarrassment and social organization. Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1999). How emotions work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (2001). From how to why: On luminous description and causal inference in ethnography (Part 1). Ethnography, 2, 443–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (2002). From how to why: On luminous description and causal inference in ethnography (Part 2). Ethnography, 3, 63–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (2004). On the rhetoric and politics of ethnographic methodology. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 595, 280–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presser, L. (2004). Violent offenders, moral selves: Constructing identities and accounts in the research interview. Social Problems, 51, 82–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. L. (1968). Constructing social theories. New York, Harcourt: Brace and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudnow, D. (1965). Normal crimes: Sociological features of the penal code in a public defender office. Social Problems, 12, 257–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (2006). Why?: What happens when people give reasons and why. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, S., & Berg, M. (2003). The gold standard: The challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack Katz.

Additional information

Jack Katz is Professor of Sociology, UCLA. His current research is on the use of IRBs to censor social research and on the diversity of neighborhood development in Hollywood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katz, J. Fourfold Tables v. Three Dimensional Realities. Qual Sociol 29, 557–563 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-006-9050-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-006-9050-9

Keywords

Navigation