Advertisement

Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 557–563 | Cite as

Fourfold Tables v. Three Dimensional Realities

  • Jack Katz
Symposium on Charles Tilly's Why?

In the land of the fourfold table, Charles Tilly is a prince. Professor Tilly (2006) wonders about the reasons people give for their and others’ conduct. He notes that reasons are offered in familiar forms which are not inserted randomly in the slots of social life. To study the social production of reasons, he creates a two dimensional grid by crossing a distinction between popular and specialized reasons with a distinction between formulas and cause/effect explanations. The resulting table contrasts conventions (popular formulas), stories (folk causal explanations), codes (specialists’ formulas), and technical accounts of cause/effect relationships that we would expect to see in a PhD dissertation or professional science publication. Through illustrations and commentaries, Professor Tilly produces a short, story-rich book that offers a systematic set of propositions about social patterns related to each type of reason, an effective pedagogy for the college professor, and a neatly...

Keywords

Social Life Causal Explanation Criminal Code Public Intellectual Plea Bargain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

References

  1. Clayman, S. E., & Heritage, J. (2002). Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of US presidents Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication, 52, 749–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Goffman, E. (1967). Embarrassment and social organization. Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  3. Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Katz, J. (1999). How emotions work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Katz, J. (2001). From how to why: On luminous description and causal inference in ethnography (Part 1). Ethnography, 2, 443–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Katz, J. (2002). From how to why: On luminous description and causal inference in ethnography (Part 2). Ethnography, 3, 63–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Katz, J. (2004). On the rhetoric and politics of ethnographic methodology. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 595, 280–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Presser, L. (2004). Violent offenders, moral selves: Constructing identities and accounts in the research interview. Social Problems, 51, 82–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Stinchcombe, A. L. (1968). Constructing social theories. New York, Harcourt: Brace and World.Google Scholar
  10. Sudnow, D. (1965). Normal crimes: Sociological features of the penal code in a public defender office. Social Problems, 12, 257–276.Google Scholar
  11. Tilly, C. (2006). Why?: What happens when people give reasons and why. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Timmermans, S., & Berg, M. (2003). The gold standard: The challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUCLALos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations