Advertisement

Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 3–24 | Cite as

Ethnography as Translation

  • Christian J. ChurchillJr.
Article

Abstract

Sociologists and anthropologists often struggle over how to accurately convey ethnographic data from the field setting to a final report. This paper examines ethnography as a form of translation in order to clarify what occurs between the acquisition of data and the formulation of a thesis about the data. The paper argues that the ethnographer’s mind should be seen as a transitional space which in the act of translating field data into an analytic report (1) poses unique challenges to ethnography’s claims for providing an accurate account of field situations while (2) simultaneously offering paths to insight which quantitative and survey research can not.

ethnography translation participant observation qualitative research 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, C. (1997). Spies like us. Linguafranca, 7, 30–39.Google Scholar
  2. American Sociological Association. (2003). Code of ethics.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, A. (2001). Translator’s preface. In S. Freud (Ed.), The psychopathology of everday life (pp. xliii–xlviii). New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  5. Blumer, H. (1998 [1969]). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bourgois, P. (2003 [1996]). In search of respect: Selling crack in El Barrio, 2nd ed. San Francisco: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Boynton, R. S. (2000). The other Freud (the wild one). The New York Times, June 10, B:9.Google Scholar
  8. Duneier, M. (1999). Sidewalk. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
  9. Durkheim, E. (1982 [1895]). The rules of sociological method. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, S. (1998). Excesses blamed for demise of the commune movement. The New York Times, August 3, A:12.Google Scholar
  12. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. (1992). Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 21, 1–132.Google Scholar
  13. Kerr, J. (1994). A most dangerous method: The story of Jung, Freud, and Sabina Spielrein. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  14. Krieger, S. (1983). The mirror dance: Identity in a women’s community. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Laffan, B. (1997). Communal organization and social transition: A case study from the counterculture of the sixties and seventies. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  16. Malcolm, J. (1980). Psychoanalysis: The impossible profession. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  17. Mead, G. H. (1967 [1934]). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Merkin, D. (2003). The literary Freud. The New York Times, July 13, 6:40.Google Scholar
  19. Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Myerhoff, B. (1978). Number our days. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  21. Psychoanalytic Inquiry. (1987). Psychoanalytic Inquiry 7:2, 141–299.Google Scholar
  22. Oakes, G., & Vidich, A. J. (1999). Collaboration, reputation, and ethics in American academic life: Hans H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  23. Proust, M. (1992 [1913–1927]). In search of lost time. C. K. S. Moncrieff, T. Kilmartin, & D. J. Enright (Trans.). New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
  24. Schwaber, E. A. (1987). Models of the mind and data–gathering in clinical work. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 7, 261–275.Google Scholar
  25. Vidich, A. J., & Bensman, J. (1960). Social theory and field research. American Journal of Sociology, 65, 577–584.Google Scholar
  26. Whyte, W. F. (1973 [1943]). Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Social SciencesSt. Thomas Aquinas CollegeSparkill

Personalised recommendations