Plant Foods for Human Nutrition

, Volume 73, Issue 2, pp 122–129 | Cite as

Phenolic profiles and their contribution to the antioxidant activity of selected chickpea genotypes from Mexico and ICRISAT collections

  • Maria F. Quintero-Soto
  • Ana G. Saracho-Peña
  • Jeanett Chavez-Ontiveros
  • Jose A. Garzon-Tiznado
  • Karen V. Pineda-Hidalgo
  • Francisco Delgado-Vargas
  • Jose A. Lopez-Valenzuela
Original Paper


Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes, nine kabuli from Mexico and 9 desi from other countries, were investigated for their phenolic profiles and antioxidant activity (AA). Phenolics in methanol extracts (ME) were analyzed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to diode array detection and mass spectrometry (UPLC-DAD-MS), whereas the AA was measured as Trolox equivalents (TE) by ABTS, DPPH and FRAP methods. Twenty phenolic compounds were identified in the ME and their levels showed a great variability among the chickpea genotypes. Phenolic acids and flavonoids were the most abundant compounds in kabuli and desi genotypes, respectively. The AA values (μmol TE/ 100 g dw) by ABTS (278–2417), DPPH (52–1650), and FRAP (41–1181) were mainly associated with the content of sinapic acid hexoside, gallic acid, myricetin, quercetin, catechin, and isorhamnetin, suggesting they are the main compounds responsible for the AA. The sum of the AA obtained for standards of these compounds evaluated at the concentration found in the extracts accounted for 34.3, 69.8, and 47.0% of the AA in the extract by ABTS, DPPH, and FRAP, respectively. In the AA by DPPH, most of the mixtures of these compounds resulted in synergistic interactions. Three desi genotypes with black seeds (ICC 4418, ICC 6306, and ICC 3761) showed the highest AA and flavonoids content, whereas the most promising kabuli genotypes were Surutato 77, Bco. Sin. 92, and Blanoro that showed the highest values of phenolic acids. These genotypes represent good sources of antioxidants for the improvement of nutraceutical properties in chickpea.


Cicer arietinum L. Phenolics Antioxidant activity UPLC-DAD-MS 



2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazolin)-6-sulfonic acid




Ferric-reducing antioxidant power


Principal component analysis



This research was funded by Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa (PROFAPI). MFQS received a scholarship from CONACYT-Mexico. We thank Milagros Ramírez and Víctor Valenzuela (INIFAP) for the field work. We also thank Nancy Salazar-Salas (UAS) for the technical assistance and Cuauhtemoc Reyes-Moreno (UAS) for the analysis of the data and the critical revision of the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11130_2018_661_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (391 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 390 kb)
11130_2018_661_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (269 kb)
ESM 2 (PDF 269 kb)
11130_2018_661_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (209 kb)
ESM 3 (PDF 208 kb)
11130_2018_661_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (115 kb)
ESM 4 (PDF 115 kb)


  1. 1.
    Wood JA, Grusak MA (2007) Nutritional value of chickpea. In: Yadav SS, Redden RJ, Chen W, Sharma B (eds) Chickpea breeding and management. CAB International, Oxfordshire, pp 101–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Singh B, Singh JP, Kaur A et al (2017) Phenolic composition and antioxidant potential of grain legume seeds: a review. Food Res Int 101:1–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heiras-Palazuelos MJ, Ochoa-Lugo MI, Gutierrez-Dorado R et al (2013) Technological properties, antioxidant activity and total phenolic and flavonoid content of pigmented chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars. Int J Food Sci Nutr 64(1):69–76CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Segev A, Badani H, Kapulnik Y et al (2010) Determination of polyphenols, flavonoids, and antioxidant capacity in colored chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J Food Sci 75(2):S115–S119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sreerama YN, Sashikala VB, Pratape VM (2010) Variability in the distribution of phenolic compounds in milled fractions of chickpea and horse gram: evaluation of their antioxidant properties. J Agric Food Chem 58(14):8322–8330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aguilera Y, Duenas M, Estrella I et al (2011) Phenolic profile and antioxidant capacity of chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) as affected by a dehydration process. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 66(2):187–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mekky RH, Contreras MD, El-Gindi MR et al (2015) Profiling of phenolic and other compounds from Egyptian cultivars of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and antioxidant activity: a comparative study. RSC Adv 5(23):17751–17767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Magalhaes SCQ, Taveira M, Cabrita ARJ et al (2017) European marketable grain legume seeds: further insight into phenolic compounds profiles. Food Chem 215:177–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Valenzuela-Herrera V, Manjarrez-Sandoval P, Morales-Gómez A et al (2016) “Jumbo 2010”, cultivar of chickpea “kabuli” type of extra large size from Sinaloa, Mexico. Glo Adv Res J Agric Sci 5(7):277–282 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    AOAC (1999) Official methods of analysis, 16th edn. AOAC International, GaithersburgGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A et al (1999) Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic Biol Med 26(9–10):1231–1237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C (1995) Use of a free-radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci Technol 28(1):25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Benzie IFF, Strain JJ (1996) The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem 239(1):70–76CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marathe SA, Rajalakshmi V, Jamdar SN et al (2011) Comparative study on antioxidant activity of different varieties of commonly consumed legumes in India. Food Chem Toxicol 49(9):2005–2012CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zia-Ul-Haq M, Iqbal S, Ahmad S et al (2008) Antioxidant potential of Desi chickpea varieties commonly consumed in Pakistan. J Food Lipids 15(3):326–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xu BJ, Chang SKC (2007) A comparative study on phenolic profiles and antioxidant activities of legumes as affected by extraction solvents. J Food Sci 72(2):S159–S166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang YK, Zhang X, Chen GL et al (2016) Antioxidant property and their free, soluble conjugate and insoluble-bound phenolic contents in selected beans. J Funct Foods 24:359–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xu BJ, Yuan SH, Chang SKC (2007) Comparative analyses of phenolic composition, antioxidant capacity, and color of cool season legumes and other selected food legumes. J Food Sci 72(2):S167–S177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Parmar N, Singh N, Kaur A et al (2016) Effect of canning on color, protein and phenolic profile of grains from kidney bean, field pea and chickpea. Food Res Int 89:526–532CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lima VN, Oliveira-Tintino CDM, Santos ES et al (2016) Antimicrobial and enhancement of the antibiotic activity by phenolic compounds: gallic acid, caffeic acid and pyrogallol. Microb Pathog 99:56–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alshikh N, de Camargo AC, Shahidi F (2015) Phenolics of selected lentil cultivars: antioxidant activities and inhibition of low-density lipoprotein and DNA damage. J Funct Foods 18:1022–1038Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li PS, Shi XJ, Wei Y et al (2015) Synthesis and biological activity of isoflavone derivatives from chickpea as potent anti-diabetic agents. Molecules 20(9):17016–17040CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu S, Hou W, Yao P et al (2010) Quercetin protects against ethanol-induced oxidative damage in rat primary hepatocytes. Toxicol in Vitro 24(2):516–522Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang D, Chu L, Liu YX et al (2011) Analysis of the antioxidant capacities of flavonoids under different spectrophotometric assays using cyclic voltammetry and density functional theory. J Agric Food Chem 59(18):10277–10285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang S, Wang D, Liu Z (2015) Synergistic, additive and antagonistic effects of Potentilla fruticosa combined with EGb761 on antioxidant capacities and the possible mechanism. Ind Crop Prod 67:227–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Peyrat-Maillard MN, Cuvelier ME, Berset C (2003) Antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds in 2,2 '-azobis (2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (AAPH)-induced oxidation: synergistic and antagonistic effects. J Am Oil Chem Soc 80(10):1007–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Prior RL, Wu XL, Schaich K (2005) Standardized methods for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements. J Agric Food Chem 53(10):4290–4302CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria F. Quintero-Soto
    • 1
  • Ana G. Saracho-Peña
    • 2
  • Jeanett Chavez-Ontiveros
    • 2
  • Jose A. Garzon-Tiznado
    • 1
    • 2
  • Karen V. Pineda-Hidalgo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Francisco Delgado-Vargas
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jose A. Lopez-Valenzuela
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Programa Regional de Doctorado en Biotecnología, Facultad de Ciencias Químico BiológicasUniversidad Autónoma de SinaloaCuliacánMexico
  2. 2.Maestría en Ciencia y Tecnología de Alimentos, Facultad de Ciencias Químico BiológicasUniversidad Autónoma de SinaloaCuliacánMexico

Personalised recommendations